🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates PEC Zwolle at 61% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this PEC Zwolle vs NAC Breda encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

NAC Breda make the trip to MAC³PARK Stadion to face PEC Zwolle in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 28. The match kicks off on Saturday 21 March 2026 at 20:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

PEC Zwolle have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 2W 5D 3L. Last five: L D D D D. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.40 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for PEC Zwolle, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, PEC Zwolle have posted 5W 3D 2L at MAC³PARK Stadion — 1.80 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.10 — PEC Zwolle are significantly better at MAC³PARK Stadion than their overall form suggests.

NAC Breda (all games): 2W 4D 4L across 10 Eredivisie outings this term — 1.00 points per game. Last five: W W L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 2.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for NAC Breda, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Eredivisie this season, NAC Breda have posted 1W 3D 6L from 10 away outings — 0.60 PPG. Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.10 for PEC Zwolle, 1.00 for NAC Breda — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 5 meetings: PEC Zwolle 3W, NAC Breda 1W, 1D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 5 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 18 Oct 2025, ended 2–2 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

PEC Zwolle goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (61 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

NAC Breda goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (61 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games); they fail to score in 34% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — PEC Zwolle 62% versus NAC Breda 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (PEC Zwolle 51% | NAC Breda 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects PEC Zwolle 1.83 xG and NAC Breda 0.78 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: PEC Zwolle attack 0.881 / defence 0.879 | NAC Breda attack 0.659 / defence 1.229. League average goals — home 1.696 / away 1.352. NAC Breda bring a strong defensive rating of 1.229 — this is suppressing PEC Zwolle's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 61 PEC Zwolle games / 61 NAC Breda games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: PEC Zwolle 61% | Draw 24% | NAC Breda 14%. Fair-value odds: PEC Zwolle 1.64 | Draw 4.17 | NAC Breda 7.14. The model has a clear lean to PEC Zwolle (61%) — a 47pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 47% | Total xG 2.62. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.62 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 47% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates PEC Zwolle as the most likely outcome at 61% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 24% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 2.62 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 49% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence — though H2H averaging only 3.0 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

Poisson assigns a 47% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: PEC Zwolle 60% | NAC Breda 40%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights