🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates NAC Breda at 51%, yet in-form Excelsior provide a compelling counter-argument — this NAC Breda vs Excelsior fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Eredivisie clash, Regular Season - 22 as NAC Breda welcome Excelsior to Rat Verlegh Stadion. Kick-off is set for Friday 6 February 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Eredivisie games this season, NAC Breda have gone 0W 4D 6L from 10 outings — a 0.40 PPG return. Last five: L D L D D. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for NAC Breda, so this record blends games from this season and last.

NAC Breda at Rat Verlegh Stadion this season: 2W 3D 5L from 10 home games — 0.90 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 0.90 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — NAC Breda are significantly better at Rat Verlegh Stadion than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Excelsior stand at 3W 4D 3L from 10 Eredivisie matches — 1.30 PPG. Last five: L D D D D. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Excelsior, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Excelsior's away record: 2W 3D 5L from 10 road trips in Eredivisie this season (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour Excelsior — 0.90 PPG ahead of the hosts (1.30 vs 0.40). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. NAC Breda register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Excelsior in 70% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 5 previous meetings, NAC Breda have won 2, Excelsior 2, with 1 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 5 meetings have averaged 4.6 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 29 Nov 2025, ended 0–1 with Excelsior winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.6 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

NAC Breda in-play and half-time data (55 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 87% of the time; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Excelsior in-play and half-time data (55 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 81% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 69% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 69% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — NAC Breda 58% versus Excelsior 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NAC Breda 53% | Excelsior 58%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NAC Breda 1.71 xG and Excelsior 1.15 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NAC Breda attack 0.891 / defence 1.090 | Excelsior attack 0.741 / defence 1.165. League average goals — home 1.648 / away 1.420. Data: 55 NAC Breda games / 21 Excelsior games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NAC Breda 51% | Draw 24% | Excelsior 26%. Fair-value odds: NAC Breda 1.96 | Draw 4.17 | Excelsior 3.85. NAC Breda hold a narrow Poisson edge at 51% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.86. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.86 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is NAC Breda at 51% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Excelsior (1.30 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on NAC Breda offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 2.86 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.6 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 56%. Form rates corroborate: NAC Breda 60% | Excelsior 70% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights