🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Heracles's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Asito Stadium, Regular Season - 26, as Heracles and Utrecht drew 0-0 in the Eredivisie. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Heracles 1.36 xG and Utrecht 1.87 xG, a combined 3.24. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Heracles fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Utrecht landed 1.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Heracles attack 0.91 / defence 1.31 against Utrecht attack 1.06 / defence 0.91, drawn from 59/59 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Heracles 28% | Draw 23% | Utrecht 49%, with Utrecht to win its most likely call at 49%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 23% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 84% and missed. Over 3.5 was 41% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Heracles 64%, Utrecht 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Heracles's trading profile (59 games, 29 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Utrecht's trading profile (59 games, 29 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Utrecht arrived the stronger side — 1.66 PPG against 0.93. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Heracles (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.72 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.90 average — tighter than their form line. Utrecht (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.76 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.38 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights