🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Virtus Entella at 40%, yet in-form Cesena provide a compelling counter-argument — this Virtus Entella vs Cesena fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Stadio Comunale plays host to Virtus Entella versus Cesena in Serie B, Regular Season - 24. Kick-off: Tuesday 10 February 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Virtus Entella have collected 0.70 PPG across 10 Serie B outings this season: 1W 4D 5L. Last five: W D L D D. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Virtus Entella, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Virtus Entella at Stadio Comunale this season: 4W 5D 1L from 10 home games — 1.70 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.70 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.70 — Virtus Entella are significantly better at Stadio Comunale than their overall form suggests.

Cesena (all games): 4W 2D 4L across 10 Serie B outings this term — 1.40 points per game. Last five: L W L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Cesena, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Cesena's form when playing away from home: 4W 1D 5L across 10 road games this term (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Cesena are 0.70 PPG clear of Virtus Entella in recent Serie B fixtures (1.40 vs 0.70). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Virtus Entella have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Cesena in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: Virtus Entella 0W, Cesena 0W, 1D.

The 1 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Aug 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

Virtus Entella goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (23 games, 11 at home): they score before half-time in 46% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 90% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 60% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 18% of games (home games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

Cesena goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (23 games, 11 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Virtus Entella 56% and Cesena 65% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Virtus Entella 26% | Cesena 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Virtus Entella 1.18 xG and Cesena 0.96 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Virtus Entella attack 0.833 / defence 0.948 | Cesena attack 0.952 / defence 1.084. League average goals — home 1.309 / away 1.066. Data: 23 Virtus Entella games / 61 Cesena games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Virtus Entella 40% | Draw 31% | Cesena 29%. Fair-value odds: Virtus Entella 2.50 | Draw 3.23 | Cesena 3.45. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 36% | BTTS probability 44% | Total xG 2.15. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 64% — total xG of 2.15 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 44% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Virtus Entella at 40% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Cesena (1.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 31% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Virtus Entella if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.15 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 36% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.2 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 44% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Virtus Entella 60% | Cesena 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights