Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Serie B · Regular Season - 22

Kick-off

Sun 1 Feb 2026

16:15

Venue

Stadio Euganeo

Competition

Serie B

Italy

Status

FT
📰

Prediction vindicated as Monza edge out Padova 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Monza beat Padova 1-2 at Stadio Euganeo, Regular Season - 22, in the Serie B. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Padova 1.12 xG and Monza 1.28 xG, a combined 2.40. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Padova attack 0.90 / defence 1.22 against Monza attack 1.03 / defence 0.97, drawn from 21/21 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Padova 31% | Draw 29% | Monza 39%, with Monza to win its most likely call at 39%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 43%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 70% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 49% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 40% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Padova 38%, Monza 43%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Padova's trading profile (21 games, 10 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did.

Monza's trading profile (21 games, 10 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Monza arrived the stronger side — 1.95 PPG against 1.19. The form guide was vindicated by the result.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 43% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 49% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 40% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.