🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Cittadella's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stadio Pier Cesare Tombolato, Regular Season - 17, as Cittadella and Cremonese drew 0-0 in the Serie B. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cittadella 0.86 xG and Cremonese 1.46 xG, a combined 2.32. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Cittadella fell 0.9 short of their projected output. Cremonese landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cittadella attack 0.72 / defence 1.01 against Cremonese attack 1.32 / defence 0.95, drawn from 54/54 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cittadella 20% | Draw 31% | Cremonese 49%, with Cremonese to win its most likely call at 49%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 41%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 69% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cittadella 43%, Cremonese 54%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cittadella's trading profile (54 games, 26 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Cremonese's trading profile (54 games, 26 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Cremonese arrived the stronger side — 1.69 PPG against 1.11. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Cittadella (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.12 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.12 average — tighter than their form line. Cremonese (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.42 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.04 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights