🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as VfB Stuttgart edge out 1. FC Heidenheim 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

VfB Stuttgart beat 1. FC Heidenheim 1-0 at MHPArena, Regular Season - 6, in the Bundesliga. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting VfB Stuttgart 1.77 xG and 1. FC Heidenheim 0.95 xG, a combined 2.72. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. 1. FC Heidenheim landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of VfB Stuttgart attack 1.06 / defence 0.76 against 1. FC Heidenheim attack 0.79 / defence 1.06, drawn from 39/39 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it VfB Stuttgart 57% | Draw 23% | 1. FC Heidenheim 20%, with VfB Stuttgart to win its most likely call at 57%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 64% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (VfB Stuttgart 69%, 1. FC Heidenheim 59%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

VfB Stuttgart's trading profile (39 games, 19 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did not.

1. FC Heidenheim's trading profile (39 games, 19 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 41% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, VfB Stuttgart arrived the stronger side — 1.51 PPG against 0.77. That form edge translated into the three points. VfB Stuttgart (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.42 average — tighter than their form line. 1. FC Heidenheim (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.32 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.89 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights