🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates 1. FC Heidenheim at 45%, yet in-form FC St. Pauli provide a compelling counter-argument — this 1. FC Heidenheim vs FC St. Pauli fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Voith-Arena plays host to 1. FC Heidenheim versus FC St. Pauli in Bundesliga, Regular Season - 31. Kick-off: Saturday 25 April 2026 at 14:30 UTC.

Current Form

1. FC Heidenheim's overall Bundesliga record this term: 1W 3D 6L from 10 games (0.60 PPG). Last five: L D D W L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 2.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

1. FC Heidenheim's home record at Voith-Arena: 2W 3D 5L from 10 Bundesliga appearances (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 2.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

FC St. Pauli (all games): 3W 3D 4L across 10 Bundesliga outings this term — 1.20 points per game. Last five: L L D L D. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

On the road, FC St. Pauli have gone 1W 3D 6L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 0.60 is notably below their overall 1.20 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

FC St. Pauli arrive in superior form — a 0.60 PPG advantage (1.20 vs 0.60) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — 1. FC Heidenheim have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, FC St. Pauli in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Head-to-Head

FC St. Pauli hold the superior head-to-head record in this fixture, claiming 5 wins from 7 meetings. The hosts have won just 1 times in that span.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.1 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 13 Dec 2025, ended 1–2 with FC St. Pauli winning.

It is worth noting that FC St. Pauli have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 5 wins from 7 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading

1. FC Heidenheim half-time and goal-timing data (64 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 69% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 39%; they fail to score in 39% of games.

FC St. Pauli half-time and goal-timing data (64 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 68% of the time; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 41% of games (away games); they fail to score in 45% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — 1. FC Heidenheim 53% versus FC St. Pauli 42%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (1. FC Heidenheim 64% | FC St. Pauli 41%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects 1. FC Heidenheim 1.72 xG and FC St. Pauli 1.42 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: 1. FC Heidenheim attack 1.002 / defence 1.391 | FC St. Pauli attack 0.697 / defence 1.007. League average goals — home 1.702 / away 1.464. Data: 64 1. FC Heidenheim games / 64 FC St. Pauli games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: 1. FC Heidenheim 45% | Draw 23% | FC St. Pauli 32%. Fair-value odds: 1. FC Heidenheim 2.22 | Draw 4.35 | FC St. Pauli 3.12. 1. FC Heidenheim hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (23%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.14. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.14 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.72 / 1.42) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is 1. FC Heidenheim at 45% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form FC St. Pauli (1.20 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 23% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on 1. FC Heidenheim if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.14 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 61% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.3 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 62% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: 1. FC Heidenheim 60% | FC St. Pauli 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights