🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Fortuna Düsseldorf (37%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Fortuna Düsseldorf face 1. FC Magdeburg.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A 2. Bundesliga encounter, Regular Season - 13 sees 1. FC Magdeburg travel to Merkur Spiel-Arena to take on Fortuna Düsseldorf. The game is scheduled for Saturday 22 November 2025, 12:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Fortuna Düsseldorf stand at 3W 2D 5L from 10 2. Bundesliga matches — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L L L D L. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Fortuna Düsseldorf, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Fortuna Düsseldorf's form when playing at home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 games at Merkur Spiel-Arena this term (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground.

1. FC Magdeburg — All Games: 1W 1D 8L from 10 2. Bundesliga fixtures this season — 0.40 PPG. Last five: L D W L L. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 2.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No. This season is still relatively young for 1. FC Magdeburg, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, 1. FC Magdeburg have gone 1W 3D 6L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 0.50 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game.

Fortuna Düsseldorf carry the stronger recent momentum — 0.70 PPG ahead of their opponents on 1.10 vs 0.40. The form data is a point in their favour, and where the price allows, it is the cleaner directional bet.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 4 wins apiece for Fortuna Düsseldorf, 2 for 1. FC Magdeburg and 0 shared spoils from 6 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 6 meetings have averaged 5.2 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 18 May 2025, ended 2–4 with 1. FC Magdeburg winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 5.2 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

Fortuna Düsseldorf in-play tendencies (46 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 61% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 87% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games).

1. FC Magdeburg in-play tendencies (46 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Fortuna Düsseldorf 61% versus 1. FC Magdeburg 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Fortuna Düsseldorf 56% | 1. FC Magdeburg 61%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Fortuna Düsseldorf 1.11 xG and 1. FC Magdeburg 1.04 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Fortuna Düsseldorf attack 0.798 / defence 1.177 | 1. FC Magdeburg attack 0.667 / defence 0.973. League average goals — home 1.425 / away 1.329. Fortuna Düsseldorf's attack strength of 0.798 is below the league average — the 1.11 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 46 Fortuna Düsseldorf games / 46 1. FC Magdeburg games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Fortuna Düsseldorf 37% | Draw 30% | 1. FC Magdeburg 34%. Fair-value odds: Fortuna Düsseldorf 2.70 | Draw 3.33 | 1. FC Magdeburg 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 36% | BTTS probability 43% | Total xG 2.15. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 64% — total xG of 2.15 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 43% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Fortuna Düsseldorf are the pick at 37% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Fortuna Düsseldorf offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.15 combined xG gives a 36% probability to Under 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by form averaging 2.1 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 5.2 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

Poisson assigns a 43% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Fortuna Düsseldorf 40% | 1. FC Magdeburg 40% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights