🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Eintracht Braunschweig at 44%, yet other data sources diverge — this Eintracht Braunschweig vs SSV Ulm 1846 fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Eintracht Braunschweig and SSV Ulm 1846 meet at Eintracht-Stadion in 2. Bundesliga, Regular Season - 24. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 1 March 2025 at 12:00 UTC.

Current Form

Eintracht Braunschweig's overall 2. Bundesliga record this term: 2W 3D 5L from 10 games (0.90 PPG). Last five: D L W W L. They are averaging 0.50 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their games — a low BTTS rate that suggests clean sheets are a regular occurrence. This season is still relatively young for Eintracht Braunschweig, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Eintracht Braunschweig's form when playing at home: 4W 3D 3L across 10 games at Eintracht-Stadion this term (1.50 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Eintracht-Stadion. Their home PPG of 1.50 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.90 — Eintracht Braunschweig are significantly better at Eintracht-Stadion than their overall form suggests.

SSV Ulm 1846 have collected 0.70 PPG across 10 2. Bundesliga outings this season: 1W 4D 5L. Last five: W L L L D. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for SSV Ulm 1846, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in 2. Bundesliga this season, SSV Ulm 1846 have posted 1W 4D 5L from 10 away outings — 0.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 0.90 for Eintracht Braunschweig, 0.70 for SSV Ulm 1846 — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 1 head-to-head meetings have produced 0 wins for Eintracht Braunschweig, 1 for SSV Ulm 1846 and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.0 per game across 1 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 27 Sep 2024, ended 1–3 with SSV Ulm 1846 winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Eintracht Braunschweig — key trading statistics (23 games, 11 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

SSV Ulm 1846 — key trading statistics (23 games, 11 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (away games); they fail to score in 44% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Eintracht Braunschweig 48% versus SSV Ulm 1846 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Eintracht Braunschweig 52% | SSV Ulm 1846 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Eintracht Braunschweig 1.28 xG and SSV Ulm 1846 0.89 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Eintracht Braunschweig attack 0.759 / defence 0.875 | SSV Ulm 1846 attack 0.759 / defence 1.159. League average goals — home 1.460 / away 1.341. Eintracht Braunschweig's attack strength of 0.759 is below the league average — the 1.28 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 57 Eintracht Braunschweig games / 23 SSV Ulm 1846 games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Eintracht Braunschweig 44% | Draw 32% | SSV Ulm 1846 24%. Fair-value odds: Eintracht Braunschweig 2.27 | Draw 3.12 | SSV Ulm 1846 4.17. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 32% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 37% | BTTS probability 44% | Total xG 2.17. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 63% — total xG of 2.17 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 44% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Eintracht Braunschweig as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 32% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Eintracht Braunschweig if the outright odds are short.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.17 combined xG gives a 37% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 44%. Form rates are neutral: Eintracht Braunschweig 40% | SSV Ulm 1846 60%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights