🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Le Mans edge out Clermont Foot 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Le Mans beat Clermont Foot 1-0 at Stade Marie-Marvingt, Regular Season - 31, in the Ligue 2. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Le Mans 1.64 xG and Clermont Foot 0.88 xG, a combined 2.52. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Clermont Foot landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Le Mans attack 1.12 / defence 0.72 against Clermont Foot attack 1.06 / defence 1.25, drawn from 30/64 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Le Mans 54% | Draw 28% | Clermont Foot 18%, with Le Mans to win its most likely call at 54%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 46%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 74% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 49% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 45% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Le Mans 40%, Clermont Foot 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Le Mans's trading profile (30 games, 15 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time, and duly kept one.

Clermont Foot's trading profile (30 games, 15 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Le Mans arrived the stronger side — 1.80 PPG against 1.00. That form edge translated into the three points. Clermont Foot (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.13 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The numbers read this fixture well — the outcome largely followed the script the data laid out beforehand.

💡 Key Insights