🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Clermont Foot at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this Clermont Foot vs PAU fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Stade Gabriel Montpied plays host to Clermont Foot versus PAU in Ligue 2, Regular Season - 27. Kick-off: Friday 13 March 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Clermont Foot have collected 0.90 PPG across 10 Ligue 2 outings this season: 3W 0D 7L. Last five: L L W W L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Clermont Foot, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Clermont Foot's form when playing at home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 games at Stade Gabriel Montpied this term (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

PAU (all games): 2W 3D 5L across 10 Ligue 2 outings this term — 0.90 points per game. Last five: W L L L D. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 2.10. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for PAU, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Ligue 2 this season, PAU have posted 5W 2D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. Their away PPG of 1.70 exceeds their overall 0.90 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.90 PPG for Clermont Foot against 0.90 for PAU. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 3 meetings: Clermont Foot 0W, PAU 1W, 2D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.0 per game across 3 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 3 Oct 2025, ended 1–3 with PAU winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Clermont Foot half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 29 at home): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; BTTS occurs in 66% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 34% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

PAU half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 29 at away): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Clermont Foot 57% versus PAU 55%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Clermont Foot 42% | PAU 57%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Clermont Foot 1.59 xG and PAU 1.49 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Clermont Foot attack 1.095 / defence 1.012 | PAU attack 1.252 / defence 1.268. League average goals — home 1.143 / away 1.178. PAU bring a strong defensive rating of 1.268 — this is suppressing Clermont Foot's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. PAU have an above-average attack strength of 1.252 — the away xG of 1.49 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 60 Clermont Foot games / 60 PAU games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Clermont Foot 39% | Draw 26% | PAU 35%. Fair-value odds: Clermont Foot 2.56 | Draw 3.85 | PAU 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 59% | BTTS probability 63% | Total xG 3.08. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 59% — the 3.08 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 63% reflects that both xG figures (1.59 / 1.49) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Clermont Foot are the pick at 39% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 26% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Clermont Foot if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.08 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 59% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game and H2H averaging 4.0 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 63% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Clermont Foot 80% | PAU 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights