🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Metz cruise to a comfortable 0-2 victory over Nantes.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Metz beat Nantes 0-2 at Stade de la Beaujoire, Regular Season - 11, in the Ligue 1. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Nantes 2.74 xG and Metz 1.26 xG, a combined 4.00. The scoreboard read 0-2 for 2 actual goals. Nantes fell 2.7 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Nantes attack 0.85 / defence 1.28 against Metz attack 0.79 / defence 1.86, drawn from 44/10 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Nantes 69% | Draw 16% | Metz 15%, with Nantes to win its most likely call at 69%. Instead the game produced a Metz win, an outcome the model had rated at just 15% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 76%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 91% and landed. Over 3.5 was 57% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 67% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Nantes 43%, Metz 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Nantes's trading profile (44 games, 22 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Metz's trading profile (44 games, 22 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Metz arrived the stronger side — 1.64 PPG against 1.02. That form edge translated into the three points. Nantes (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.14 scoring average — below par going forward. Metz (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.82 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights