📋

Poisson model favours VPS (69%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as VPS face Mariehamn.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Veikkausliiga encounter, Regular Season - 14 sees Mariehamn travel to Lemonsoft Stadion to take on VPS. The game is scheduled for Saturday 4 July 2026, 15:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Veikkausliiga games this season, VPS have gone 5W 4D 1L from 10 outings — a 1.90 PPG return. Last five: L D W W D. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.00 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for VPS, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Lemonsoft Stadion, VPS have gone 6W 3D 1L this season (10 games, 2.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Mariehamn stand at 0W 2D 8L from 10 Veikkausliiga matches — 0.20 PPG. Last five: L L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Mariehamn, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Mariehamn away from home this season: 1W 2D 7L from 10 away games — 0.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

VPS are in the better shape of the two on current Veikkausliiga data — 1.70 PPG ahead (1.90 vs 0.20). That form margin is the baseline of a sensible selection even before other signals are layered in.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. VPS register both teams scoring in 80% of relevant matches, Mariehamn in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H

The fixture history tells a clear story: VPS have dominated this rivalry, winning 5 of 9 past contests while Mariehamn have managed just 1 wins.

The 9 previous meetings have averaged 2.8 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 2 May 2026, ended 1–0 with VPS winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both VPS and goals. The home side's 5 wins from 9 meetings, combined with an average of 2.8 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Season Statistics

VPS's full-season record stands at 5W 6D 2L from 13 games. Attacking returns: 1.3 goals per game; defensive: 0.8 conceded per outing. Biggest win: 5-1 (H) / 1-2 (A). Heaviest defeat: – (H) / 1-0 (A). Their best winning run this season has been 2 consecutive games. Longest draw run: 2 games. They have failed to score in 4 games this season. 3 clean sheets this season (1 at home, 2 away). Scored 2+ goals in 2 of 13 games (15%). Penalties this season: 2 scored / 3 missed from 5 awarded. Most used formation: 3-4-1-2. Discipline: 1.8 yellow cards per game, 0.15 reds per game.

In-Play Data

VPS trading profile (40 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (home games).

Mariehamn trading profile (40 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 91% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (away games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — VPS 65% and Mariehamn 55% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (VPS 50% | Mariehamn 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects VPS 2.14 xG and Mariehamn 0.72 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: VPS attack 1.245 / defence 0.887 | Mariehamn attack 0.674 / defence 1.154. League average goals — home 1.491 / away 1.212. Data: 35 VPS games / 35 Mariehamn games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: VPS 69% | Draw 22% | Mariehamn 10%. Fair-value odds: VPS 1.45 | Draw 4.55 | Mariehamn 10.00. The model has a clear lean to VPS (69%) — a 59pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 47% | Total xG 2.87. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.87 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 47% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is VPS at 69% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.87 combined xG gives a 55% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 47% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: VPS 80% | Mariehamn 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights