KuPS 0-2 VPS – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates KuPS at 42%, yet in-form VPS provide a compelling counter-argument — this KuPS vs VPS fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Analysis & Preview
VPS travel to Väre Areena to take on KuPS in Veikkausliiga (Championship Round - 1). The game is scheduled for Sunday 17 September 2023 at 15:00 UK time.
Form Analysis
Looking at their last 10 matches, KuPS stand at 5W 3D 2L — 1.80 PPG. Last five: W W W D D. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 1.00 conceded. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base.
At home, KuPS have gone 7W 0D 3L in their last 10 home games (2.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 0.40 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from their last 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at home. At home, both teams have scored in only 10% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.
VPS — last 10 games: 10W 0D 0L — 3.00 PPG. Last five: W W W W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.40 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. Defensively, 0.50 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 6 clean sheets from 10 games (60%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not.
VPS's away record over their last 10 away games: 5W 1D 4L (1.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from their last 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. Their away PPG of 1.60 is notably below their overall 3.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness recently.
The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. VPS are 1.20 PPG ahead (3.00 vs 1.80), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.
In-Play Profile
KuPS in-play tendencies (last 49 games, 25 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 72% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; of the 6 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 50%; BTTS occurs in 36% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 49% of the time.
VPS in-play tendencies (last 49 games, 25 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 68% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (away games).
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — KuPS 41% versus VPS 47%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (KuPS 43% | VPS 59%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects KuPS 1.17 xG and VPS 0.89 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: KuPS attack 1.062 / defence 0.670 | VPS attack 1.036 / defence 0.832. League average goals — home 1.328 / away 1.278. KuPS have a tight defence (rating 0.670), which is pulling VPS's projected output down. Data: built from KuPS's last 44 games and VPS's last 44.
Result probabilities: KuPS 42% | Draw 31% | VPS 27%. Fair-value odds: KuPS 2.38 | Draw 3.26 | VPS 3.67. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 34% | BTTS Yes probability 41% | Total xG 2.06. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 66% probability — total xG of 2.06 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match. BTTS No at 59% is only a slight lean — the model gives both sides a fair chance of scoring, so No isn't a clear standalone call.
Analysis Verdict
On the Poisson output, KuPS are the pick at 42% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form VPS (3.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — the model adjusts for opposition strength, which raw form results do not. With a 31% draw probability, Draw No Bet on KuPS offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.
Poisson projects 2.06 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 66% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by recent form (KuPS's last 10 home games and VPS's last 10 away games) averaging 2.0 goals per game.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 59%. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: KuPS 10% (last 10 home games) | VPS 40% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: KuPS vs VPS | Competition: Veikkausliiga, Championship Round - 1 | Venue: Väre Areena • Kick-off: Sunday 17 September 2023 at 15:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: KuPS 42% | Draw 31% | VPS 27% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 34% (Under 66%) | BTTS Yes 41% (No 59%) | xG KuPS 1.17 / VPS 0.89 • Poisson strength factors: KuPS attack 1.062 / def 0.670 | VPS attack 1.036 / def 0.832 | league avg home 1.328 / away 1.278 • Poisson stance: KuPS (42%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.17
KuPS xG
Expected Goals
0.89
VPS xG
41%
BTTS
61%
Over 1.5
34%
Over 2.5
15%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ KuPS vs VPS FAQs
What time does KuPS vs VPS kick off?
KuPS vs VPS kicked off at 15:00 UK time on Sunday 17 September 2023 at Väre Areena.
What was the final score in KuPS vs VPS?
KuPS 0 - 2 VPS.
Where is KuPS vs VPS being played?
The match is being played at Väre Areena.
What competition is KuPS vs VPS part of?
KuPS vs VPS is a Veikkausliiga fixture (Championship Round - 1) (Finland).
Who is favourite to win KuPS vs VPS?
Our statistical model gives KuPS a 42% chance of winning, VPS a 27% chance, and a 31% chance of a draw — making KuPS the favourite.
Will both teams score in KuPS vs VPS?
Our model estimates a 41% probability that both KuPS and VPS will score, so it leans towards BTTS No (59%).
Will KuPS vs VPS have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 34%, so it leans towards under 2.5 goals (66%).
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
The model rates KuPS's attack at 1.06x the league average against VPS's defence at 0.83x — combine the two and it projects 1.17 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, VPS's attack versus KuPS's defence, projects 0.89 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from KuPS's last 44 games and VPS's last 44 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 15.0% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-0 (14.5%), 1-0 (13.2%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 43% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
KuPS Win
42%
2.38
31%
3.26
27%
3.67
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 0
14.9%
Home win
Most likely
1 – 1
13.3%
Draw
0 – 0
12.7%
Draw
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.17
KuPS xG
Total xG
2.06
0.89
VPS xG
2.38
42%
Home win
3.26
31%
Draw
3.67
27%
Away win
Goals Markets
61%
Over 1.5
1.64
39%
Under 1.5
2.56
34%
Over 2.5
2.94
66%
Under 2.5
1.52
15%
Over 3.5
6.67
85%
Under 3.5
1.18
6%
Over 4.5
16.67
94%
Under 4.5
1.06
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
41%
BTTS Yes
2.44
59%
BTTS No
1.70
Clean Sheet
41%
2.43
31%
3.23
Win to Nil
17%
5.77
8%
11.86
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 12.7 | 11.3 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 14.9 | 13.3 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 8.8 | 7.8 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | – |
| 3 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
| 4 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – | – |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ KuPS vs VPS Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for KuPS vs VPS?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.0%.
How many goals are KuPS and VPS expected to score?
The model projects 1.17 expected goals for KuPS and 0.89 for VPS, a combined total of 2.06.
How confident is the prediction model for KuPS vs VPS?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 42%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
KuPS's recent record stands at 30W 10D 9L from 49 games, a 2.04 PPG return, with W-W-W-D-D in the last five.
VPS, meanwhile, have gone 23W 7D 19L across 49 games — 1.55 PPG, with W-W-W-W-W in their last five.
The points-per-game comparison favours KuPS by 0.49 — a real, if not enormous, edge over VPS heading into this one.
Home Ground vs the Road
At home specifically, KuPS have managed 17W 4D 4L from their last 25 home games — 2.20 PPG in front of their own supporters.
VPS's away record stands at 14W 3D 8L across their last 25 away games, a 1.80 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, KuPS come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
The Goals Picture
KuPS are averaging 1.57 goals scored and 0.73 conceded per game recently; VPS are on 1.65 scored and 1.29 conceded.
Defensively: KuPS have kept a clean sheet in 49% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 49 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
KuPS
Blended
VPS
Blended
KuPS (Home) vs VPS (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
KuPS
Blended
VPS
Blended
❓ KuPS vs VPS Form FAQs
What form are KuPS and VPS in coming into this match?
KuPS have gone 30W 10D 9L in their last 49 games (2.04 PPG), while VPS have gone 23W 7D 19L in their last 49 (1.55 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — KuPS at home or VPS away?
KuPS's home record (2.20 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — KuPS at home: 2.20 PPG; VPS away: 1.80 PPG.
Have KuPS or VPS been keeping clean sheets recently?
KuPS have kept a clean sheet in 49% of their recent games, VPS in 29%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The head-to-head numbers here are drawn from the 10 H2H matches in our data, going back to September 2023. All of them came in Veikkausliiga. The most recent was as recently as 18 October 2026, so it is a fresh reference point.
Digging Into the Numbers
KuPS have won each of the latest 3 H2H matches we hold, a run that gives them the edge coming in.
KuPS's record when hosting VPS specifically: 4W 0D 2L from 6 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.
Last 10 Meetings
6
KuPS
2
Draws
2
VPS
Recent Meetings
❓ KuPS vs VPS H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and VPS?
Across the 10 head-to-head matches in our data, KuPS have won 6, VPS have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.
When did KuPS and VPS last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 18 October 2026: KuPS 2-0 VPS.
Who has won more matches between KuPS and VPS?
KuPS have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from the 10 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
KuPS are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 72% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 56% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 50% of those situations.
VPS are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 40% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 20% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.
The Numbers That Matter
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — KuPS 36%, VPS 48% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 44% (KuPS) and 56% (VPS).
On the defensive side: KuPS keep a clean sheet in 52% of their matches; VPS in 32%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = KuPS home games / VPS away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ KuPS vs VPS Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in KuPS and VPS matches?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 36% of KuPS's recent matches and 48% of VPS's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Are KuPS and VPS matches usually high-scoring?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 44% of KuPS's recent games and 56% of VPS's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do KuPS and VPS matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 72% of KuPS's recent matches and 68% of VPS's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
VPS cruise to a comfortable 0-2 victory over KuPS.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
VPS beat KuPS 0-2 at Väre Areena, Championship Round - 1, in the Veikkausliiga. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting KuPS 1.17 xG and VPS 0.89 xG, a combined 2.06. The scoreboard read 0-2 for 2 actual goals. KuPS fell 1.2 short of their projected output. VPS outscored their 0.89 projection by 1.1. Those figures were built on strength ratings of KuPS attack 1.06 / defence 0.67 against VPS attack 1.04 / defence 0.83, drawn from 44/44 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it KuPS 42% | Draw 31% | VPS 27%, with KuPS to win its most likely call at 42%. The actual VPS win had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 61% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 41% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (KuPS 43%, VPS 59%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 44%, which matched the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
KuPS's trading profile (49 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 49% of the time, and conceded here.
VPS's trading profile (49 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
On form, KuPS arrived the stronger side — 2.04 PPG against 1.55. Form was overturned, with VPS winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. KuPS (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.68 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 2 against a 0.56 concession average — a leakier day than usual. VPS (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.24 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.