🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 35% as Nottingham Forest take on Crystal Palace.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Premier League encounter, Regular Season - 24 sees Crystal Palace travel to City Ground to take on Nottingham Forest. The game is scheduled for Sunday 1 February 2026, 14:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Nottingham Forest — All Games: 4W 1D 5L from 10 Premier League outings this season, averaging 1.30 points per game. Last five: L L W D W. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Nottingham Forest, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Nottingham Forest at City Ground this season: 2W 2D 6L from 10 home games — 0.80 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.80 lags behind their overall 1.30 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at City Ground this season.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Crystal Palace stand at 2W 2D 6L from 10 Premier League matches — 0.80 PPG. Last five: D L D L L. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Crystal Palace, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Crystal Palace away from home this season: 5W 0D 5L from 10 away games — 1.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 1.50 exceeds their overall 0.80 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

On current form, Nottingham Forest have the edge — a 0.50 PPG advantage (1.30 vs 0.80) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 7 previous meetings, Nottingham Forest have won 2, Crystal Palace 0, with 5 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.4 per contest from 7 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 24 Aug 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.4 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Nottingham Forest in-play tendencies (61 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 37% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (home games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

Crystal Palace in-play tendencies (61 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 33% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Nottingham Forest 43% versus Crystal Palace 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Nottingham Forest 51% | Crystal Palace 46%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Nottingham Forest 1.22 xG and Crystal Palace 1.16 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Nottingham Forest attack 0.831 / defence 1.026 | Crystal Palace attack 0.894 / defence 0.995. League average goals — home 1.478 / away 1.262. Data: 61 Nottingham Forest games / 61 Crystal Palace games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Nottingham Forest 34% | Draw 35% | Crystal Palace 31%. Fair-value odds: Nottingham Forest 2.94 | Draw 2.86 | Crystal Palace 3.23. The draw (35%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 42% | BTTS probability 52% | Total xG 2.38. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 58% — total xG of 2.38 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 52% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 35% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 34% and away win at 31% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 2.38 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 42% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by H2H averaging 1.4 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 52%. This conflicts with form data: Nottingham Forest 30% | Crystal Palace 50% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights