Sign in Register

Nottingham Forest 2-3 Bournemouth – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 6

Kick-off

Sat 3 Sep 2022

15:00

Venue

The City Ground

Competition

Premier League

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Nottingham Forest at 65%, yet other data sources diverge — this Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

The City Ground plays host to Nottingham Forest versus Bournemouth in Premier League, Regular Season - 6. Kick-off: Saturday 3 September 2022 at 15:00 UTC.

Current Form

Nottingham Forest's overall Premier League record this term: 3W 2D 5L from 10 games (1.10 PPG). Last five: L W D L L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Nottingham Forest have played only a handful of Premier League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

At home at The City Ground, Nottingham Forest have gone 8W 0D 2L this season (10 games, 2.40 PPG). They are averaging 2.40 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at The City Ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 2.40 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.10 — Nottingham Forest are significantly better at The City Ground than their overall form suggests.

Bournemouth have collected 1.50 PPG across 10 Premier League outings this season: 4W 3D 3L. Last five: W L L L D. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 2.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No. Bournemouth have played only a handful of Premier League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Bournemouth away from home this season: 4W 2D 4L from 10 away games — 1.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.10 for Nottingham Forest, 1.50 for Bournemouth — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Both sides have a clean-sheet tendency (using home/away splits) — Nottingham Forest have seen both teams score in just 30% of their matches, Bournemouth in only 30%. BTTS No has clear statistical support from the form record of both squads.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 2 meetings: Nottingham Forest 0W, Bournemouth 2W, 0D.

The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 3 May 2022, ended 0–1 with Bournemouth winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

Nottingham Forest half-time and goal-timing data (51 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 77% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games).

Bournemouth half-time and goal-timing data (51 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 59% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; they lead at the break 46% of the time; BTTS occurs in 29% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Nottingham Forest 43% versus Bournemouth 41%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Nottingham Forest 41% | Bournemouth 51%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Nottingham Forest 2.01 xG and Bournemouth 0.78 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Nottingham Forest attack 0.703 / defence 1.060 | Bournemouth attack 0.635 / defence 1.821. League average goals — home 1.573 / away 1.156. Nottingham Forest's attack strength of 0.703 is below the league average — the 2.01 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Bournemouth bring a strong defensive rating of 1.821 — this is suppressing Nottingham Forest's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 5 Nottingham Forest games / 5 Bournemouth games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Nottingham Forest 65% | Draw 22% | Bournemouth 12%. Fair-value odds: Nottingham Forest 1.54 | Draw 4.55 | Bournemouth 8.33. The model has a clear lean to Nottingham Forest (65%) — a 53pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 53% | BTTS probability 48% | Total xG 2.79. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 53%/47% — the total xG of 2.79 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 48% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Nottingham Forest are the pick at 65% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

Poisson projects 2.79 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 53% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.3 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 48% on No. Form rates corroborate: Nottingham Forest 30% | Bournemouth 30% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Bournemouth but Poisson model leans Nottingham Forest — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Form Nottingham Forest Poisson xG (2.01) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.40) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Bournemouth Poisson xG (0.78) is below their form scoring rate (1.50) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Nottingham Forest at 65% home win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 6 | Venue: The City Ground • Kick-off: Saturday 3 Sep 2022, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Nottingham Forest 65% | Draw 22% | Bournemouth 12% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 53% | BTTS 48% | xG Nottingham Forest 2.01 / Bournemouth 0.78 • Poisson strength factors: Nottingham Forest attack 0.703 / def 1.060 | Bournemouth attack 0.635 / def 1.821 | league avg home 1.573 / away 1.156 • Poisson stance: Nottingham Forest (65%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.01

Nottingham Forest xG

Expected Goals

0.78

Bournemouth xG

65%
22%
Nottingham Forest Draw Bournemouth

48%

BTTS

78%

Over 1.5

53%

Over 2.5

31%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth kick off?

Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 3 September 2022 at The City Ground.

What was the final score in Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth?

Nottingham Forest 2 - 3 Bournemouth.

Where is Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth being played?

The match is being played at The City Ground.

What competition is Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth part of?

Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth is a Regular Season - 6 fixture in the Premier League (England).

Who is favourite to win Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth?

Our statistical model gives Nottingham Forest a 65% chance of winning, Bournemouth a 12% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Nottingham Forest the favourite.

Will both teams score in Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth?

Our model estimates a 48% probability that both Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth will score (BTTS).

Will Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 53%.

What is the head-to-head record between Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth?

Record (2 meetings): Nottingham Forest 0W | Draws 0 | Bournemouth 2W.

What form are Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth in?

Nottingham Forest (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-W-D-L-L. Bournemouth (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 2.00 | L5 W-L-L-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Working from Nottingham Forest's attack rating (0.70) and Bournemouth's defence rating (1.82), the model arrives at 2.01 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Bournemouth's attack (0.64x) against Nottingham Forest's defence (1.06x) — and the away total comes out at 0.78.

These ratings are built from 5/5 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 2-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 12.4%. Close behind: 1-0 (11.1%), 1-1 (10.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 34% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Nottingham Forest Win

65%

Nottingham Forest

1.53

22%

Draw

4.48

12%

Bournemouth

8.03

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

12.4%

Home win

Most likely

2 – 0

12.4%

Home win

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.01

Nottingham Forest xG

Total xG

2.79

0.78

Bournemouth xG

65%
22%
12%
Nottingham ForestDrawBournemouth

1.53

65%

Home win

4.48

22%

Draw

8.03

12%

Away win

Goals Markets

77%

Over 1.5

1.30

23%

Under 1.5

4.35

53%

Over 2.5

1.89

47%

Under 2.5

2.13

31%

Over 3.5

3.23

69%

Under 3.5

1.45

15%

Over 4.5

6.67

85%

Under 4.5

1.18

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

48%

BTTS Yes

2.09

52%

BTTS No

1.92

Clean Sheet

46%

Nottingham Forest

2.18

13%

Bournemouth

7.49

Win to Nil

30%

Nottingham Forest

3.34

2%

Bournemouth

60.13

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 6.1 4.8 1.9 0.5 0.1
1 12.4 9.6 3.7 1.0 0.2
2 12.4 9.7 3.8 1.0 0.2
3 8.3 6.5 2.5 0.7 0.1
4 4.2 3.3 1.3 0.3 0.1
5 1.7 1.3 0.5 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.013
λ Away (xG) 0.778
Total xG 2.791
League avg home goals 1.573
League avg away goals 1.156
Nottingham Forest attack strength 0.703
Nottingham Forest defence strength 1.060
Bournemouth attack strength 0.635
Bournemouth defence strength 1.821
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 5 / 5

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth?

Our Poisson model rates 2-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.4%.

How many goals are Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth expected to score?

The model projects 2.01 expected goals for Nottingham Forest and 0.78 for Bournemouth, a combined total of 2.79.

How confident is the prediction model for Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 65%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 51 outings, Nottingham Forest have picked up 1.76 PPG on a 26W 12D 13L record — L-W-D-L-L across the most recent five. It's still early in the season for Nottingham Forest, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Bournemouth's form line: 26W 14D 11L from 51 games, 1.80 PPG, last five W-L-L-L-D. It's still early in the season for Bournemouth, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.76 PPG for Nottingham Forest against 1.80 for Bournemouth. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Nottingham Forest have posted 1.92 PPG from 24 outings (14W 4D 6L).

On the road, Bournemouth have gone 11W 6D 7L from 24 away games — 1.62 PPG when travelling.

Attack vs Defence

Nottingham Forest are averaging 1.49 goals scored and 0.94 conceded per game recently; Bournemouth are on 1.49 scored and 1.08 conceded.

Defensively: Nottingham Forest have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their games; Bournemouth in 45% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 51 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Early Season
L W D L L
Bournemouth

Bournemouth

Early Season
W L L L D
51 Played 51
26/12/13 W / D / L 26/14/11
1.76 Points Per Game 1.80
1.49 Avg Goals Scored 1.49
0.94 Avg Goals Conceded 1.08
2.43 Avg Goals / Game 2.57
19 Clean Sheets 23
22 BTTS 21
21 Over 2.5 Games 26
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

L
A Manchester City
0–6
31 Aug
L
H Tottenham
0–2
28 Aug
D
A Everton
1–1
20 Aug
W
H West Ham
1–0
14 Aug
L
A Newcastle
0–2
06 Aug
W
A Huddersfield
1–0 HT 1–0
29 May
L
H Sheffield Utd
1–2 HT 1–0
17 May
W
A Sheffield Utd
2–1 HT 1–0
14 May
D
A Hull City
1–1 HT 0–0
07 May
L
A Bournemouth
0–1 HT 0–0
03 May
W
H Swansea
5–1 HT 1–1
30 Apr
W
A Fulham
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A Peterborough
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Apr
W
H West Brom
4–0 HT 3–0
18 Apr
L
A Luton
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Apr
W
H Birmingham
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Apr
W
H Coventry
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Blackpool
4–1 HT 3–0
02 Apr
W
H QPR
3–1 HT 0–1
16 Mar
W
H Reading
4–0 HT 1–0
12 Mar
D
A Sheffield Utd
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Mar
W
H Bristol City
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Feb
D
A Preston
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Stoke City
2–2 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
A Blackburn
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Feb
L
A Cardiff
1–2 HT 0–1
30 Jan
W
H Barnsley
3–0 HT 2–0
25 Jan
W
H Derby
2–1 HT 0–0
22 Jan
W
A Millwall
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Jan
L
H Huddersfield
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Dec
L
A Middlesbrough
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
W
H Hull City
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Dec
W
A Swansea
4–1 HT 0–0
11 Dec
W
H Peterborough
2–0 HT 0–0
04 Dec
D
A West Brom
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Nov
D
H Luton
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
A Reading
1–1 HT 1–0
20 Nov
W
H Preston
3–0 HT 2–0
06 Nov
D
H Sheffield Utd
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Nov
D
A QPR
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
H Fulham
0–4 HT 0–1
24 Oct
W
A Bristol City
2–1 HT 0–1
19 Oct
W
H Blackpool
2–1 HT 1–0
16 Oct
W
A Birmingham
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Oct
W
A Barnsley
3–1 HT 0–1
29 Sep
D
H Millwall
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Sep
W
A Huddersfield
2–0 HT 1–0
18 Sep
L
H Middlesbrough
0–2 HT 0–1
15 Sep
L
H Cardiff
1–2 HT 1–0
12 Sep
D
A Derby
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Aug
L
A Stoke City
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Aug
Bournemouth

Bournemouth

D
H Wolves
0–0
31 Aug
L
A Liverpool
0–9
27 Aug
L
H Arsenal
0–3
20 Aug
L
A Manchester City
0–4
13 Aug
W
H Aston Villa
2–0
06 Aug
W
H Millwall
1–0 HT 0–0
07 May
W
H Nottingham Forest
1–0 HT 0–0
03 May
W
A Blackburn
3–0 HT 1–0
30 Apr
D
A Swansea
3–3 HT 0–2
26 Apr
D
H Fulham
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Apr
W
A Coventry
3–0 HT 2–0
18 Apr
D
H Middlesbrough
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Apr
D
A Sheffield Utd
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Apr
L
A West Brom
0–2 HT 0–2
06 Apr
W
H Bristol City
3–2 HT 1–1
02 Apr
W
A Huddersfield
3–0 HT 2–0
19 Mar
D
H Reading
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Mar
W
H Derby
2–0 HT 1–0
12 Mar
D
H Peterborough
1–1 HT 0–1
08 Mar
L
A Preston
1–2 HT 0–0
05 Mar
W
H Stoke City
2–1 HT 0–1
26 Feb
W
A Blackpool
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Feb
W
H Birmingham
3–1 HT 2–0
09 Feb
W
A Barnsley
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Jan
L
H Hull City
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Jan
L
A Luton
2–3 HT 0–2
15 Jan
W
H Cardiff
3–0 HT 1–0
30 Dec
W
A QPR
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Dec
L
A Middlesbrough
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
L
H Blackburn
0–2 HT 0–1
11 Dec
D
A Fulham
1–1 HT 0–0
03 Dec
D
H Coventry
2–2 HT 1–0
27 Nov
D
A Millwall
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Nov
L
A Derby
2–3 HT 2–1
21 Nov
W
H Swansea
4–0 HT 1–0
06 Nov
L
H Preston
1–2 HT 0–0
03 Nov
W
A Reading
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Oct
W
H Huddersfield
3–0 HT 2–0
23 Oct
W
A Stoke City
1–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
A Bristol City
2–0 HT 2–0
16 Oct
W
H Sheffield Utd
2–1 HT 0–0
02 Oct
D
A Peterborough
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
W
H Luton
2–1 HT 2–0
25 Sep
W
A Cardiff
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Sep
W
H QPR
2–1 HT 2–0
14 Sep
W
H Barnsley
3–0 HT 1–0
11 Sep
D
A Hull City
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Aug
D
H Blackpool
2–2 HT 2–0
21 Aug
W
A Birmingham
2–0 HT 0–0
18 Aug
W
A Nottingham Forest
2–1 HT 1–0
14 Aug
D
H West Brom
2–2 HT 1–1
06 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth in coming into this match?

Nottingham Forest have gone 26W 12D 13L in their last 51 games (1.76 PPG), while Bournemouth have gone 26W 14D 11L in their last 51 (1.80 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Nottingham Forest at home or Bournemouth away?

Nottingham Forest's home record (1.92 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Nottingham Forest at home: 1.92 PPG; Bournemouth away: 1.62 PPG.

Have Nottingham Forest or Bournemouth been keeping clean sheets recently?

Nottingham Forest have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their recent games, Bournemouth in 45%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 10 times that we have on record, stretching back to August 2021 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 4 years. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Championship, Premier League all feature in the head-to-head log. The two were last together as recently as 24 May 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bournemouth won 5-0 on 25 Jan 2025, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Nottingham Forest have gone 0W 2D 3L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Bournemouth — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Nottingham Forest

0

Nottingham Forest

4

Draws

Bournemouth

6

Bournemouth

Recent Meetings

Nottingham Forest
1–1
24 May 26
Bournemouth
Bournemouth
2–0
26 Oct 25
Nottingham Forest
Bournemouth
5–0
25 Jan 25
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–1
17 Aug 24
Bournemouth
Bournemouth
1–1
04 Feb 24
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
2–3
23 Dec 23
Bournemouth
Bournemouth
1–1
21 Jan 23
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
2–3
03 Sep 22
Bournemouth
Bournemouth
1–0
03 May 22
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–2
14 Aug 21
Bournemouth

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth?

From 10 meetings on record, Nottingham Forest have won 0, Bournemouth have won 6, and 4 have been drawn.

When did Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth last play each other?

They last met on 24 May 2026, when Nottingham Forest 1-1 Bournemouth.

Who has won more matches between Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth?

Bournemouth have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Nottingham Forest are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 46% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 14% of those situations.

Bournemouth see a goal before the break in 59% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 41% of the time.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Nottingham Forest 42%, Bournemouth 29% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 54% (Nottingham Forest) and 42% (Bournemouth).

On the defensive side: Nottingham Forest keep a clean sheet in 42% of their matches; Bournemouth in 54%; Bournemouth in 29%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Nottingham Forest home games / Bournemouth away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Early Season
Metric All
(51 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 33/46
(71.7%)
17/22
(77.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 6/46
(13%)
4/22
(18.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/13
(76.9%)
4/5
(80%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/13
(53.8%)
4/5
(80%)
Winning at HT 19/46
(41.3%)
10/22
(45.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/46
(6.5%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/46
(15.2%)
3/22
(13.6%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/51
(43.1%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 21/51
(41.2%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/51
(19.6%)
6/24
(25%)
Clean Sheet 19/51
(37.3%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Failed to Score 13/51
(25.5%)
5/24
(20.8%)
Bournemouth Bournemouth Early Season
Metric All
(51 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 30/46
(65.2%)
13/22
(59.1%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/46
(30.4%)
7/22
(31.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/16
(75%)
6/9
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/16
(37.5%)
3/9
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 21/46
(45.7%)
9/22
(40.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/46
(10.9%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/46
(8.7%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 21/51
(41.2%)
7/24
(29.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 26/51
(51%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 11/51
(21.6%)
5/24
(20.8%)
Clean Sheet 23/51
(45.1%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Failed to Score 12/51
(23.5%)
7/24
(29.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Nottingham Forest play Bournemouth?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 42% of Nottingham Forest's recent matches and 29% of Bournemouth's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Nottingham Forest vs Bournemouth usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 54% of Nottingham Forest's recent games and 42% of Bournemouth's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Nottingham Forest and Bournemouth tend to score early?

Nottingham Forest have had a goal before half-time in 77% of their recent matches, Bournemouth in 59% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Bournemouth defy the odds to beat Nottingham Forest 2-3.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Bournemouth beat Nottingham Forest 2-3 at The City Ground, Regular Season - 6, in the Premier League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Nottingham Forest 2.01 xG and Bournemouth 0.78 xG, a combined 2.79. The scoreboard read 2-3 for 5 actual goals. Bournemouth outscored their 0.78 projection by 2.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Nottingham Forest attack 0.70 / defence 1.06 against Bournemouth attack 0.64 / defence 1.82, drawn from 5/5 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Nottingham Forest 65% | Draw 22% | Bournemouth 12%, with Nottingham Forest to win its most likely call at 65%. Instead the game produced a Bournemouth win, an outcome the model had rated at just 12% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 53%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 78% and landed. Over 3.5 was 31% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Nottingham Forest 41%, Bournemouth 51%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 42%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (51 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 43% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and conceded here.

Bournemouth's trading profile (51 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Nottingham Forest 1.76 PPG, Bournemouth 1.80 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Bournemouth win broke the near-deadlock. Nottingham Forest (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 0.92 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Bournemouth (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.29 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 53% Over 2.5 probability, 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 48% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 46% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.