Sign in Register

Crystal Palace 1-1 Nottingham Forest – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 2

Kick-off

Sun 24 Aug 2025

14:00

Venue

Selhurst Park

Competition

Premier League

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Crystal Palace at 44%, yet other data sources diverge — this Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Crystal Palace host Nottingham Forest at Selhurst Park in Premier League, Regular Season - 2. Kick-off is scheduled for Sunday 24 August 2025 at 14:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Crystal Palace — All Games: 3W 5D 2L from 10 Premier League outings this season, averaging 1.40 points per game. Last five: D W W D D. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.70 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Crystal Palace have played only a handful of Premier League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

In front of their own supporters this season, Crystal Palace have posted 5W 3D 2L at Selhurst Park — 1.80 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Premier League games this season, Nottingham Forest have recorded 4W 2D 4L from 10 outings — 1.40 PPG. Last five: D D W L W. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Nottingham Forest have played only a handful of Premier League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Nottingham Forest's away record: 5W 1D 4L from 10 road trips in Premier League this season (1.60 PPG). They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.40 PPG (Crystal Palace) versus 1.40 (Nottingham Forest). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 6 previous meetings, Crystal Palace have won 0, Nottingham Forest 2, with 4 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The last 6 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.3 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 5 May 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.3 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Crystal Palace in-play tendencies (39 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 0% of fixtures in home games; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games).

Nottingham Forest in-play tendencies (39 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 0% of fixtures in away games; they lead at the break 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Crystal Palace 56% versus Nottingham Forest 49%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Crystal Palace 44% | Nottingham Forest 51%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Crystal Palace 1.60 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.34 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Crystal Palace attack 1.039 / defence 1.000 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.098 / defence 1.031. League average goals — home 1.492 / away 1.217. Data: 39 Crystal Palace games / 39 Nottingham Forest games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Crystal Palace 44% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 32%. Fair-value odds: Crystal Palace 2.27 | Draw 4.17 | Nottingham Forest 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.94. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.94 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Crystal Palace are the pick at 44% — marginal model lean. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Crystal Palace offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.94 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 56% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.3 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 59% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Crystal Palace 80% | Nottingham Forest 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (39 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–4D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Nottingham Forest but Poisson model leans Crystal Palace — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H only shows 1.33 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.94 — blended (current + last season) attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Nottingham Forest Poisson xG (1.34) is below their form scoring rate (1.90) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Crystal Palace 8/10, Nottingham Forest 7/10) and Poisson model (59%).

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 2 | Venue: Selhurst Park • Kick-off: Sunday 24 Aug 2025, 14:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Crystal Palace 44% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 32% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 56% | BTTS 59% | xG Crystal Palace 1.60 / Nottingham Forest 1.34 • Poisson strength factors: Crystal Palace attack 1.039 / def 1.000 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.098 / def 1.031 | league avg home 1.492 / away 1.217 • Poisson stance: Crystal Palace (44%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.60

Crystal Palace xG

Expected Goals

1.34

Nottingham Forest xG

44%
24%
32%
Crystal Palace Draw Nottingham Forest

59%

BTTS

79%

Over 1.5

56%

Over 2.5

34%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest kick off?

Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest kicked off at 14:00 on Sunday 24 August 2025 at Selhurst Park.

What was the final score in Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Crystal Palace 1 - 1 Nottingham Forest.

Where is Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest being played?

The match is being played at Selhurst Park.

What competition is Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest part of?

Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest is a Regular Season - 2 fixture in the Premier League (England).

Who is favourite to win Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Our statistical model gives Crystal Palace a 44% chance of winning, Nottingham Forest a 32% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making Crystal Palace the favourite.

Will both teams score in Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Our model estimates a 59% probability that both Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest will score (BTTS).

Will Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 56%.

What is the head-to-head record between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest?

Record (6 meetings): Crystal Palace 0W | Draws 4 | Nottingham Forest 2W.

What form are Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest in?

Crystal Palace (all comps): 3W-5D-2L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.70 | L5 D-W-W-D-D. Nottingham Forest (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 1.20 | L5 D-D-W-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from Crystal Palace's attack rating (1.04) and Nottingham Forest's defence rating (1.03), the model arrives at 1.60 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Nottingham Forest's attack versus Crystal Palace's defence, projects 1.34 expected goals for the visitors.

The sample (39/39 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 12.8%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.1%), 1-2 (7.6%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Crystal Palace Win

44%

Crystal Palace

2.29

24%

Draw

4.10

32%

Nottingham Forest

3.12

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.4%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.1%

Home win

1 – 0

8.5%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.60

Crystal Palace xG

Total xG

2.94

1.34

Nottingham Forest xG

44%
24%
32%
Crystal PalaceDrawNottingham Forest

2.29

44%

Home win

4.10

24%

Draw

3.12

32%

Away win

Goals Markets

79%

Over 1.5

1.27

21%

Under 1.5

4.76

56%

Over 2.5

1.79

44%

Under 2.5

2.27

34%

Over 3.5

2.94

66%

Under 3.5

1.52

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

59%

BTTS Yes

1.70

41%

BTTS No

2.43

Clean Sheet

26%

Crystal Palace

3.81

20%

Nottingham Forest

4.94

Win to Nil

11%

Crystal Palace

8.73

6%

Nottingham Forest

15.44

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.3 7.1 4.7 2.1 0.7 0.2
1 8.5 11.4 7.6 3.4 1.1 0.3
2 6.8 9.1 6.1 2.7 0.9 0.2
3 3.6 4.8 3.2 1.4 0.5 0.1
4 1.4 1.9 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.1
5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.598
λ Away (xG) 1.337
Total xG 2.935
League avg home goals 1.492
League avg away goals 1.217
Crystal Palace attack strength 1.039
Crystal Palace defence strength 1.000
Nottingham Forest attack strength 1.098
Nottingham Forest defence strength 1.031
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 39 / 39

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.8%.

How many goals are Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest expected to score?

The model projects 1.60 expected goals for Crystal Palace and 1.34 for Nottingham Forest, a combined total of 2.94.

How confident is the prediction model for Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 44%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 39 outings, Crystal Palace have picked up 1.38 PPG on a 13W 15D 11L record — D-W-W-D-D across the most recent five. It's still early in the season for Crystal Palace, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Nottingham Forest's form line: 20W 8D 11L from 39 games, 1.74 PPG, last five D-D-W-L-W. It's still early in the season for Nottingham Forest, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Form-wise this is close to level: Crystal Palace on 1.38 PPG, Nottingham Forest on 1.74. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Crystal Palace have posted 1.32 PPG from 19 outings (6W 7D 6L).

On the road, Nottingham Forest have gone 10W 3D 6L from 19 away games — 1.74 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Nottingham Forest come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Crystal Palace are averaging 1.31 goals scored and 1.31 conceded per game recently; Nottingham Forest are on 1.56 scored and 1.21 conceded.

Last 39 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace

Early Season
D W W D D
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Early Season
D D W L W
39 Played 39
13/15/11 W / D / L 20/8/11
1.38 Points Per Game 1.74
1.31 Avg Goals Scored 1.56
1.31 Avg Goals Conceded 1.21
2.62 Avg Goals / Game 2.77
12 Clean Sheets 13
22 BTTS 19
17 Over 2.5 Games 20
Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace

D
A Chelsea
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
D
A Liverpool
1–1
25 May
W
H Wolves
4–2
20 May
W
A Tottenham
2–0
11 May
D
H Nottingham Forest
1–1
05 May
D
A Arsenal
2–2
23 Apr
D
H Bournemouth
0–0
19 Apr
L
A Newcastle
0–5
16 Apr
L
A Manchester City
2–5
12 Apr
W
H Brighton
2–1
05 Apr
D
A Southampton
1–1
02 Apr
W
H Ipswich
1–0
08 Mar
W
H Aston Villa
4–1
25 Feb
W
A Fulham
2–0
22 Feb
L
H Everton
1–2
15 Feb
W
A Manchester United
2–0
02 Feb
L
H Brentford
1–2
26 Jan
W
A West Ham
2–0
18 Jan
W
A Leicester
2–0
15 Jan
D
H Chelsea
1–1
04 Jan
W
H Southampton
2–1
29 Dec
D
A Bournemouth
0–0
26 Dec
L
H Arsenal
1–5
21 Dec
W
A Brighton
3–1
15 Dec
D
H Manchester City
2–2
07 Dec
W
A Ipswich
1–0
03 Dec
D
H Newcastle
1–1
30 Nov
D
A Aston Villa
2–2
23 Nov
L
H Fulham
0–2
09 Nov
D
A Wolves
2–2
02 Nov
W
H Tottenham
1–0
27 Oct
L
A Nottingham Forest
0–1
21 Oct
L
H Liverpool
0–1
05 Oct
L
A Everton
1–2
28 Sep
D
H Manchester United
0–0
21 Sep
D
H Leicester
2–2
14 Sep
D
A Chelsea
1–1
01 Sep
L
H West Ham
0–2
24 Aug
L
A Brentford
1–2
18 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

W
H Brentford
3–1 HT 3–0
17 Aug
L
H Chelsea
0–1
25 May
W
A West Ham
2–1
18 May
D
H Leicester
2–2
11 May
D
A Crystal Palace
1–1
05 May
L
H Brentford
0–2
01 May
W
A Tottenham
2–1
21 Apr
L
H Everton
0–1
12 Apr
L
A Aston Villa
1–2
05 Apr
W
H Manchester United
1–0
01 Apr
W
A Ipswich
4–2
15 Mar
W
H Manchester City
1–0
08 Mar
D
H Arsenal
0–0
26 Feb
L
A Newcastle
3–4
23 Feb
L
A Fulham
1–2
15 Feb
W
H Brighton
7–0
01 Feb
L
A Bournemouth
0–5
25 Jan
W
H Southampton
3–2
19 Jan
D
H Liverpool
1–1
14 Jan
W
A Wolves
3–0
06 Jan
W
A Everton
2–0
29 Dec
W
H Tottenham
1–0
26 Dec
W
A Brentford
2–0
21 Dec
W
H Aston Villa
2–1
14 Dec
W
A Manchester United
3–2
07 Dec
L
A Manchester City
0–3
04 Dec
W
H Ipswich
1–0
30 Nov
L
A Arsenal
0–3
23 Nov
L
H Newcastle
1–3
10 Nov
W
H West Ham
3–0
02 Nov
W
A Leicester
3–1
25 Oct
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0
21 Oct
D
A Chelsea
1–1
06 Oct
L
H Fulham
0–1
28 Sep
D
A Brighton
2–2
22 Sep
W
A Liverpool
1–0
14 Sep
D
H Wolves
1–1
31 Aug
W
A Southampton
1–0
24 Aug
D
H Bournemouth
1–1
17 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest in coming into this match?

Crystal Palace have gone 13W 15D 11L in their last 39 games (1.38 PPG), while Nottingham Forest have gone 20W 8D 11L in their last 39 (1.74 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Crystal Palace at home or Nottingham Forest away?

Nottingham Forest's away record (1.74 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Crystal Palace at home: 1.32 PPG; Nottingham Forest away: 1.74 PPG.

Have Crystal Palace or Nottingham Forest been keeping clean sheets recently?

Crystal Palace have kept a clean sheet in 31% of their recent games, Nottingham Forest in 33%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to November 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. They last met on 1 February 2026, roughly 7 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The last 3 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

Crystal Palace's record when hosting Nottingham Forest specifically: 0W 4D 0L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Crystal Palace

0

Crystal Palace

6

Draws

Nottingham Forest

2

Nottingham Forest

Recent Meetings

Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Feb 26
Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace
1–1
24 Aug 25
Nottingham Forest
Crystal Palace
1–1
05 May 25
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–0
21 Oct 24
Crystal Palace
Nottingham Forest
1–1
30 Mar 24
Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace
0–0
07 Oct 23
Nottingham Forest
Crystal Palace
1–1
28 May 23
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–0
12 Nov 22
Crystal Palace

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest?

From 8 meetings on record, Crystal Palace have won 0, Nottingham Forest have won 2, and 6 have been drawn.

When did Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest last play each other?

They last met on 1 February 2026, when Nottingham Forest 1-1 Crystal Palace.

Who has won more matches between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest?

Nottingham Forest have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Crystal Palace tend to start slowly — only 0% of their games have a goal by half-time.

Nottingham Forest are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 100% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Crystal Palace 63%, Nottingham Forest 58% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 47% (Crystal Palace) and 68% (Nottingham Forest). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 26% and 32% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Crystal Palace have failed to score in 26% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Crystal Palace home games / Nottingham Forest away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Crystal Palace Crystal Palace Early Season
Metric All
(39 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 0/1
(0%)
β€”
2+ Goals Before HT 0/1
(0%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Winning at HT 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/39
(56.4%)
12/19
(63.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/39
(43.6%)
9/19
(47.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 11/39
(28.2%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Clean Sheet 12/39
(30.8%)
4/19
(21.1%)
Failed to Score 9/39
(23.1%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Early Season
Metric All
(39 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 1/1
(100%)
β€”
2+ Goals Before HT 1/1
(100%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half β€” β€”
Winning at HT 1/1
(100%)
β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 19/39
(48.7%)
11/19
(57.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 20/39
(51.3%)
13/19
(68.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 11/39
(28.2%)
6/19
(31.6%)
Clean Sheet 13/39
(33.3%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Failed to Score 8/39
(20.5%)
3/19
(15.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Crystal Palace play Nottingham Forest?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 63% of Crystal Palace's games and 58% of Nottingham Forest's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 47% of Crystal Palace's matches and 68% of Nottingham Forest's.

Do Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest tend to score early?

Crystal Palace have had a goal before half-time in 0% of their recent matches, Nottingham Forest in 100% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Selhurst Park, Regular Season - 2, as Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest drew 1-1 in the Premier League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Crystal Palace 1.60 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.34 xG, a combined 2.94. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Crystal Palace attack 1.04 / defence 1.00 against Nottingham Forest attack 1.10 / defence 1.03, drawn from 39/39 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Crystal Palace 44% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 32%, with Crystal Palace to win its most likely call at 44%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 59% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 47% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Crystal Palace 44%, Nottingham Forest 51%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Crystal Palace's trading profile (39 games, 19 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (39 games, 19 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Crystal Palace 1.38 PPG, Nottingham Forest 1.74 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 56% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 59% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 47% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.