Sign in Register

Crystal Palace 1-1 Nottingham Forest – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 35

Kick-off

Mon 5 May 2025

20:00

Venue

Selhurst Park

Competition

Premier League

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Crystal Palace at 40%, yet other data sources diverge — this Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Crystal Palace host Nottingham Forest at Selhurst Park in Premier League, Regular Season - 35. Kick-off is scheduled for Monday 5 May 2025 at 20:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Crystal Palace — All Games: 4W 3D 3L from 10 Premier League outings this season, averaging 1.50 points per game. Last five: W L L D D. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.70 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, Crystal Palace have posted 4W 3D 3L at Selhurst Park — 1.50 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Premier League games this season, Nottingham Forest have recorded 4W 1D 5L from 10 outings — 1.30 PPG. Last five: W L L W L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Nottingham Forest's away record: 6W 0D 4L from 10 road trips in Premier League this season (1.80 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.80 exceeds their overall 1.30 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.50 PPG (Crystal Palace) versus 1.30 (Nottingham Forest). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Crystal Palace register both teams scoring in 80% of relevant matches, Nottingham Forest in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 5 previous meetings, Crystal Palace have won 0, Nottingham Forest 2, with 3 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The last 5 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.2 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 21 Oct 2024, ended 0–1 with Nottingham Forest winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.2 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Crystal Palace in-play tendencies (72 games, 36 at home): BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

Nottingham Forest in-play tendencies (72 games, 36 at away): BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Crystal Palace 58% versus Nottingham Forest 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Crystal Palace 51% | Nottingham Forest 53%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Crystal Palace 1.55 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.45 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Crystal Palace attack 0.915 / defence 0.886 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.168 / defence 1.135. League average goals — home 1.491 / away 1.398. Data: 72 Crystal Palace games / 72 Nottingham Forest games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Crystal Palace 40% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 36%. Fair-value odds: Crystal Palace 2.50 | Draw 4.17 | Nottingham Forest 2.78. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 58% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 3.00. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 58% — the 3.00 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.55 / 1.45) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Crystal Palace are the pick at 40% — marginal model lean. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Crystal Palace offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.00 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 58% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 3.5 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.2 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 60% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Crystal Palace 80% | Nottingham Forest 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–3D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Nottingham Forest but Poisson model leans Crystal Palace — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H only shows 1.20 goals/game but Poisson xG is 3.00 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Nottingham Forest Poisson xG (1.45) is below their form scoring rate (2.10) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Crystal Palace 8/10, Nottingham Forest 6/10) and Poisson model (60%).
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 60% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 35 | Venue: Selhurst Park • Kick-off: Monday 5 May 2025, 20:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Crystal Palace 40% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 36% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 58% | BTTS 60% | xG Crystal Palace 1.55 / Nottingham Forest 1.45 • Poisson strength factors: Crystal Palace attack 0.915 / def 0.886 | Nottingham Forest attack 1.168 / def 1.135 | league avg home 1.491 / away 1.398 • Poisson stance: Crystal Palace (40%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.55

Crystal Palace xG

Expected Goals

1.45

Nottingham Forest xG

40%
24%
36%
Crystal Palace Draw Nottingham Forest

60%

BTTS

80%

Over 1.5

58%

Over 2.5

35%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest kick off?

Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest kicked off at 20:00 on Monday 5 May 2025 at Selhurst Park.

What was the final score in Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Crystal Palace 1 - 1 Nottingham Forest.

Where is Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest being played?

The match is being played at Selhurst Park.

What competition is Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest part of?

Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest is a Regular Season - 35 fixture in the Premier League (England).

Who is favourite to win Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Our statistical model gives Crystal Palace a 40% chance of winning, Nottingham Forest a 36% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making Crystal Palace the favourite.

Will both teams score in Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Our model estimates a 60% probability that both Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest will score (BTTS).

Will Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 58%.

What is the head-to-head record between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest?

Record (5 meetings): Crystal Palace 0W | Draws 3 | Nottingham Forest 2W.

What form are Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest in?

Crystal Palace (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.70 | L5 W-L-L-D-D. Nottingham Forest (all comps): 4W-1D-5L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-L-L-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from Crystal Palace's attack rating (0.92) and Nottingham Forest's defence rating (1.14), the model arrives at 1.55 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Nottingham Forest's attack versus Crystal Palace's defence, projects 1.45 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 72/72 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 12.7%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.7%), 1-2 (8.1%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Crystal Palace Win

40%

Crystal Palace

2.50

24%

Draw

4.10

36%

Nottingham Forest

2.81

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.2%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

8.7%

Home win

1 – 2

8.1%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.55

Crystal Palace xG

Total xG

3.00

1.45

Nottingham Forest xG

40%
24%
36%
Crystal PalaceDrawNottingham Forest

2.50

40%

Home win

4.10

24%

Draw

2.81

36%

Away win

Goals Markets

80%

Over 1.5

1.25

20%

Under 1.5

5.00

58%

Over 2.5

1.72

42%

Under 2.5

2.38

35%

Over 3.5

2.86

65%

Under 3.5

1.54

18%

Over 4.5

5.56

82%

Under 4.5

1.22

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

60%

BTTS Yes

1.66

40%

BTTS No

2.52

Clean Sheet

24%

Crystal Palace

4.25

21%

Nottingham Forest

4.70

Win to Nil

9%

Crystal Palace

10.63

8%

Nottingham Forest

13.21

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.0 7.2 5.2 2.5 0.9 0.3
1 7.7 11.2 8.1 3.9 1.4 0.4
2 6.0 8.7 6.3 3.0 1.1 0.3
3 3.1 4.5 3.2 1.6 0.6 0.2
4 1.2 1.7 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.1
5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.548
λ Away (xG) 1.448
Total xG 2.996
League avg home goals 1.491
League avg away goals 1.398
Crystal Palace attack strength 0.915
Crystal Palace defence strength 0.886
Nottingham Forest attack strength 1.168
Nottingham Forest defence strength 1.135
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 72 / 72

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.7%.

How many goals are Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest expected to score?

The model projects 1.55 expected goals for Crystal Palace and 1.45 for Nottingham Forest, a combined total of 3.00.

How confident is the prediction model for Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 40%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 72 outings, Crystal Palace have picked up 1.31 PPG on a 24W 22D 26L record — W-L-L-D-D across the most recent five.

Nottingham Forest's form line: 27W 15D 30L from 72 games, 1.33 PPG, last five W-L-L-W-L.

Form-wise this is close to level: Crystal Palace on 1.31 PPG, Nottingham Forest on 1.33. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Crystal Palace have posted 1.36 PPG from 36 outings (13W 10D 13L).

On the road, Nottingham Forest have gone 13W 6D 17L from 36 away games — 1.25 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

Crystal Palace are averaging 1.39 goals scored and 1.46 conceded per game recently; Nottingham Forest are on 1.42 scored and 1.50 conceded.

Last 72 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace

Current Season
W L L D D
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Current Season
W L L W L
72 Played 72
24/22/26 W / D / L 27/15/30
1.31 Points Per Game 1.33
1.39 Avg Goals Scored 1.42
1.46 Avg Goals Conceded 1.50
2.85 Avg Goals / Game 2.92
20 Clean Sheets 17
42 BTTS 40
37 Over 2.5 Games 38
Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace

D
A Arsenal
2–2
23 Apr
D
H Bournemouth
0–0
19 Apr
L
A Newcastle
0–5
16 Apr
L
A Manchester City
2–5
12 Apr
W
H Brighton
2–1
05 Apr
D
A Southampton
1–1
02 Apr
W
H Ipswich
1–0
08 Mar
W
H Aston Villa
4–1
25 Feb
W
A Fulham
2–0
22 Feb
L
H Everton
1–2
15 Feb
W
A Manchester United
2–0
02 Feb
L
H Brentford
1–2
26 Jan
W
A West Ham
2–0
18 Jan
W
A Leicester
2–0
15 Jan
D
H Chelsea
1–1
04 Jan
W
H Southampton
2–1
29 Dec
D
A Bournemouth
0–0
26 Dec
L
H Arsenal
1–5
21 Dec
W
A Brighton
3–1
15 Dec
D
H Manchester City
2–2
07 Dec
W
A Ipswich
1–0
03 Dec
D
H Newcastle
1–1
30 Nov
D
A Aston Villa
2–2
23 Nov
L
H Fulham
0–2
09 Nov
D
A Wolves
2–2
02 Nov
W
H Tottenham
1–0
27 Oct
L
A Nottingham Forest
0–1
21 Oct
L
H Liverpool
0–1
05 Oct
L
A Everton
1–2
28 Sep
D
H Manchester United
0–0
21 Sep
D
H Leicester
2–2
14 Sep
D
A Chelsea
1–1
01 Sep
L
H West Ham
0–2
24 Aug
L
A Brentford
1–2
18 Aug
W
H Aston Villa
5–0
19 May
W
A Wolves
3–1
11 May
W
H Manchester United
4–0
06 May
D
A Fulham
1–1
27 Apr
W
H Newcastle
2–0
24 Apr
W
H West Ham
5–2
21 Apr
W
A Liverpool
1–0
14 Apr
L
H Manchester City
2–4
06 Apr
L
A Bournemouth
0–1
02 Apr
D
A Nottingham Forest
1–1
30 Mar
D
H Luton
1–1
09 Mar
L
A Tottenham
1–3
02 Mar
W
H Burnley
3–0
24 Feb
D
A Everton
1–1
19 Feb
L
H Chelsea
1–3
12 Feb
L
A Brighton
1–4
03 Feb
W
H Sheffield Utd
3–2
30 Jan
L
A Arsenal
0–5
20 Jan
W
H Brentford
3–1
30 Dec
L
A Chelsea
1–2
27 Dec
D
H Brighton
1–1
21 Dec
D
A Manchester City
2–2
16 Dec
L
H Liverpool
1–2
09 Dec
L
H Bournemouth
0–2
06 Dec
D
A West Ham
1–1
03 Dec
L
A Luton
1–2
25 Nov
L
H Everton
2–3
11 Nov
W
A Burnley
2–0
04 Nov
L
H Tottenham
1–2
27 Oct
L
A Newcastle
0–4
21 Oct
D
H Nottingham Forest
0–0
07 Oct
W
A Manchester United
1–0
30 Sep
D
H Fulham
0–0
23 Sep
L
A Aston Villa
1–3
16 Sep
W
H Wolves
3–2
03 Sep
D
A Brentford
1–1
26 Aug
L
H Arsenal
0–1
21 Aug
W
A Sheffield Utd
1–0
12 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

L
H Brentford
0–2
01 May
W
A Tottenham
2–1
21 Apr
L
H Everton
0–1
12 Apr
L
A Aston Villa
1–2
05 Apr
W
H Manchester United
1–0
01 Apr
W
A Ipswich
4–2
15 Mar
W
H Manchester City
1–0
08 Mar
D
H Arsenal
0–0
26 Feb
L
A Newcastle
3–4
23 Feb
L
A Fulham
1–2
15 Feb
W
H Brighton
7–0
01 Feb
L
A Bournemouth
0–5
25 Jan
W
H Southampton
3–2
19 Jan
D
H Liverpool
1–1
14 Jan
W
A Wolves
3–0
06 Jan
W
A Everton
2–0
29 Dec
W
H Tottenham
1–0
26 Dec
W
A Brentford
2–0
21 Dec
W
H Aston Villa
2–1
14 Dec
W
A Manchester United
3–2
07 Dec
L
A Manchester City
0–3
04 Dec
W
H Ipswich
1–0
30 Nov
L
A Arsenal
0–3
23 Nov
L
H Newcastle
1–3
10 Nov
W
H West Ham
3–0
02 Nov
W
A Leicester
3–1
25 Oct
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0
21 Oct
D
A Chelsea
1–1
06 Oct
L
H Fulham
0–1
28 Sep
D
A Brighton
2–2
22 Sep
W
A Liverpool
1–0
14 Sep
D
H Wolves
1–1
31 Aug
W
A Southampton
1–0
24 Aug
D
H Bournemouth
1–1
17 Aug
W
A Burnley
2–1
19 May
L
H Chelsea
2–3
11 May
W
A Sheffield Utd
3–1
04 May
L
H Manchester City
0–2
28 Apr
L
A Everton
0–2
21 Apr
D
H Wolves
2–2
13 Apr
L
A Tottenham
1–3
07 Apr
W
H Fulham
3–1
02 Apr
D
H Crystal Palace
1–1
30 Mar
D
A Luton
1–1
16 Mar
L
A Brighton
0–1
10 Mar
L
H Liverpool
0–1
02 Mar
L
A Aston Villa
2–4
24 Feb
W
H West Ham
2–0
17 Feb
L
H Newcastle
2–3
10 Feb
D
A Bournemouth
1–1
04 Feb
L
H Arsenal
1–2
30 Jan
L
A Brentford
2–3
20 Jan
W
H Manchester United
2–1
30 Dec
W
A Newcastle
3–1
26 Dec
L
H Bournemouth
2–3
23 Dec
L
H Tottenham
0–2
15 Dec
D
A Wolves
1–1
09 Dec
L
A Fulham
0–5
06 Dec
L
H Everton
0–1
02 Dec
L
H Brighton
2–3
25 Nov
L
A West Ham
2–3
12 Nov
W
H Aston Villa
2–0
05 Nov
L
A Liverpool
0–3
29 Oct
D
H Luton
2–2
21 Oct
D
A Crystal Palace
0–0
07 Oct
D
H Brentford
1–1
01 Oct
L
A Manchester City
0–2
23 Sep
D
H Burnley
1–1
18 Sep
W
A Chelsea
1–0
02 Sep
L
A Manchester United
2–3
26 Aug
W
H Sheffield Utd
2–1
18 Aug
L
A Arsenal
1–2
12 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest in coming into this match?

Crystal Palace have gone 24W 22D 26L in their last 72 games (1.31 PPG), while Nottingham Forest have gone 27W 15D 30L in their last 72 (1.33 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Crystal Palace at home or Nottingham Forest away?

Crystal Palace's home record (1.36 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Crystal Palace at home: 1.36 PPG; Nottingham Forest away: 1.25 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to November 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. They last met on 1 February 2026, roughly 7 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The last 3 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

Crystal Palace's record when hosting Nottingham Forest specifically: 0W 4D 0L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Crystal Palace

0

Crystal Palace

6

Draws

Nottingham Forest

2

Nottingham Forest

Recent Meetings

Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Feb 26
Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace
1–1
24 Aug 25
Nottingham Forest
Crystal Palace
1–1
05 May 25
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–0
21 Oct 24
Crystal Palace
Nottingham Forest
1–1
30 Mar 24
Crystal Palace
Crystal Palace
0–0
07 Oct 23
Nottingham Forest
Crystal Palace
1–1
28 May 23
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–0
12 Nov 22
Crystal Palace

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest?

From 8 meetings on record, Crystal Palace have won 0, Nottingham Forest have won 2, and 6 have been drawn.

When did Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest last play each other?

They last met on 1 February 2026, when Nottingham Forest 1-1 Crystal Palace.

Who has won more matches between Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest?

Nottingham Forest have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Crystal Palace 58%, Nottingham Forest 58% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 56% (Crystal Palace) and 64% (Nottingham Forest). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 36% and 39% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Crystal Palace home games / Nottingham Forest away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Crystal Palace Crystal Palace Current Season
Metric All
(72 games)
Venue
(36 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT β€” β€”
2+ Goals Before HT β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half β€” β€”
Winning at HT β€” β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) β€” β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) β€” β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 42/72
(58.3%)
21/36
(58.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 37/72
(51.4%)
20/36
(55.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 26/72
(36.1%)
13/36
(36.1%)
Clean Sheet 20/72
(27.8%)
10/36
(27.8%)
Failed to Score 15/72
(20.8%)
9/36
(25%)
Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Current Season
Metric All
(72 games)
Venue
(36 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT β€” β€”
2+ Goals Before HT β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half β€” β€”
Winning at HT β€” β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) β€” β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) β€” β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 40/72
(55.6%)
21/36
(58.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 38/72
(52.8%)
23/36
(63.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 24/72
(33.3%)
14/36
(38.9%)
Clean Sheet 17/72
(23.6%)
7/36
(19.4%)
Failed to Score 17/72
(23.6%)
9/36
(25%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Crystal Palace play Nottingham Forest?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 58% of Crystal Palace's games and 58% of Nottingham Forest's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Crystal Palace vs Nottingham Forest usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 56% of Crystal Palace's matches and 64% of Nottingham Forest's.

📰

Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest finished level at 1-1 at Selhurst Park, Regular Season - 35, in the Premier League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Crystal Palace 1.55 xG and Nottingham Forest 1.45 xG, a combined 3.00. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Crystal Palace attack 0.92 / defence 0.89 against Nottingham Forest attack 1.17 / defence 1.14, drawn from 72/72 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Crystal Palace 40% | Draw 24% | Nottingham Forest 36%, with Crystal Palace to win its most likely call at 40%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 58%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 80% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Crystal Palace 51%, Nottingham Forest 53%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Crystal Palace's trading profile (72 games, 36 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did.

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (72 games, 36 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Crystal Palace 1.31 PPG, Nottingham Forest 1.33 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Nottingham Forest (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 1.81 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 58% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 60% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 52% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.