🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shock result as Gillingham defy the odds to beat Port Vale 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gillingham beat Port Vale 0-1 at Vale Park, Regular Season - 46, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Port Vale 1.45 xG and Gillingham 0.71 xG, a combined 2.16. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Port Vale fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Port Vale attack 1.12 / defence 0.79 against Gillingham attack 0.79 / defence 0.98, drawn from 45/91 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Port Vale 54% | Draw 28% | Gillingham 18%, with Port Vale to win its most likely call at 54%. Instead the game produced a Gillingham win, an outcome the model had rated at just 18% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 37%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 64% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 39% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 39% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Port Vale 45%, Gillingham 33%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 44%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Port Vale's trading profile (91 games, 45 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 34% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gillingham's trading profile (91 games, 45 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Port Vale 1.33 PPG, Gillingham 1.31 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gillingham win broke the near-deadlock. Port Vale (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.36 scoring average — below par going forward. Gillingham (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.33 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights