🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Oldham at 36%, yet in-form Cambridge United provide a compelling counter-argument — this Oldham vs Cambridge United fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A League Two encounter, Regular Season - 30 sees Cambridge United travel to Boundary Park to take on Oldham. The game is scheduled for Saturday 31 January 2026, 15:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Oldham — All Games: 4W 3D 3L from 10 League Two outings this season, averaging 1.50 points per game. Last five: D W D W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Oldham, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Oldham's form when playing at home: 4W 5D 1L across 10 games at Boundary Park this term (1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground.

Across all League Two games this season, Cambridge United have recorded 7W 3D 0L from 10 outings — 2.40 PPG. Last five: W W W W W. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 0.70. Defensively, 0.70 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Cambridge United, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Cambridge United have gone 3W 5D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.40 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. Their away PPG of 1.40 is notably below their overall 2.40 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Cambridge United are 0.90 PPG ahead (2.40 vs 1.50), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for Oldham, 0 for Cambridge United and 0 shared spoils from 1 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The last 1 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 6 Sep 2025, ended 1–0 with Oldham winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Profile

Oldham in-play tendencies (26 games, 13 at home): they score before half-time in 54% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 44% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (home games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

Cambridge United in-play tendencies (26 games, 13 at away): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; they lead at the break 46% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 23% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Oldham 46% versus Cambridge United 50%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Oldham 38% | Cambridge United 31%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Oldham 0.96 xG and Cambridge United 0.90 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Oldham attack 0.894 / defence 0.886 | Cambridge United attack 0.831 / defence 0.846. League average goals — home 1.273 / away 1.215. Data: 26 Oldham games / 27 Cambridge United games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Oldham 36% | Draw 32% | Cambridge United 32%. Fair-value odds: Oldham 2.78 | Draw 3.12 | Cambridge United 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 32% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 28% | BTTS probability 37% | Total xG 1.86. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 72% probability — total xG of 1.86 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 37% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Oldham are the pick at 36% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Cambridge United (2.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 32% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Oldham offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 1.86 combined xG gives a 28% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 1.8 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 37% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Oldham 50% | Cambridge United 40% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights