Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 33

Kick-off

Sat 22 Feb 2025

15:00

Venue

Rodney Parade

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
📰

Dominant Cheltenham run riot with a 0-3 hammering of Newport County.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Cheltenham beat Newport County 0-3 at Rodney Parade, Regular Season - 33, in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Newport County 1.57 xG and Cheltenham 0.88 xG, a combined 2.46. The scoreboard read 0-3 for 3 actual goals. Newport County fell 1.6 short of their projected output. Cheltenham outscored their 0.88 projection by 2.1. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Newport County attack 1.01 / defence 1.05 against Cheltenham attack 0.78 / defence 1.19, drawn from 77/30 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Newport County 53% | Draw 27% | Cheltenham 20%, with Newport County to win its most likely call at 53%. Instead the game produced a Cheltenham win, an outcome the model had rated at just 20% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 44%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 71% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 47% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Newport County 59%, Cheltenham 47%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 54%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Newport County's trading profile (76 games, 37 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 29% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Cheltenham's trading profile (76 games, 37 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Newport County 1.25 PPG, Cheltenham 1.12 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Cheltenham win broke the near-deadlock. Newport County (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.54 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 1.51 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Cheltenham (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 0.86 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.43 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 44% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 47% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 53% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.