🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Gillingham's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Priestfield Stadium, Regular Season - 32, as Gillingham and Crewe drew 0-0 in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gillingham 0.90 xG and Crewe 1.02 xG, a combined 1.92. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gillingham fell 0.9 short of their projected output. Crewe landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gillingham attack 0.80 / defence 1.11 against Crewe attack 0.81 / defence 0.85, drawn from 75/77 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gillingham 31% | Draw 33% | Crewe 37%, with Crewe to win its most likely call at 37%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 33%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 30%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 58% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 39% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 39% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gillingham 36%, Crewe 41%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 45%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gillingham's trading profile (75 games, 37 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Crewe's trading profile (75 games, 37 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gillingham 1.29 PPG, Crewe 1.55 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Gillingham (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.14 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.05 average — tighter than their form line. Crewe (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.16 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.11 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights