🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Gillingham run riot with a 4-1 hammering of Chesterfield.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gillingham beat Chesterfield 4-1 at Priestfield Stadium, Regular Season - 4, in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gillingham 0.96 xG and Chesterfield 0.93 xG, a combined 1.89. The scoreboard read 4-1 for 5 actual goals. Gillingham beat their projection by 3.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gillingham attack 0.90 / defence 0.79 against Chesterfield attack 1.07 / defence 0.82, drawn from 49/49 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gillingham 34% | Draw 34% | Chesterfield 32%, with Gillingham to win its most likely call at 34%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 29%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 58% and landed. Over 3.5 was 12% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 39% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gillingham 26%, Chesterfield 55%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 47%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gillingham's trading profile (49 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 45% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and conceded here.

Chesterfield's trading profile (49 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gillingham 1.29 PPG, Chesterfield 1.53 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gillingham win broke the near-deadlock. Gillingham (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.04 average — above their attacking norm. Chesterfield (home/away splits) shipped 4 against a 1.21 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights