🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Walsall cruise to a comfortable 0-2 victory over Chesterfield.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Walsall beat Chesterfield 0-2 at SMH Group Stadium, Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals, in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chesterfield 1.49 xG and Walsall 1.21 xG, a combined 2.70. The scoreboard read 0-2 for 2 actual goals. Chesterfield fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chesterfield attack 1.30 / defence 1.15 against Walsall attack 0.93 / defence 0.89, drawn from 46/92 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chesterfield 43% | Draw 27% | Walsall 30%, with Chesterfield to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual Walsall win had been the model's second-ranked read at 30%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 76% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 55% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chesterfield 56%, Walsall 50%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chesterfield's trading profile (46 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and conceded here.

Walsall's trading profile (46 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chesterfield 1.52 PPG, Walsall 1.67 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Walsall win broke the near-deadlock. Chesterfield (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.78 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 2 against a 1.17 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Walsall (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 0.96 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights