🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Carlisle's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Brunton Park, Regular Season - 33, as Carlisle and Gillingham drew 0-0 in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Carlisle 0.74 xG and Gillingham 1.09 xG, a combined 1.84. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gillingham landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Carlisle attack 0.59 / defence 1.36 against Gillingham attack 0.75 / defence 0.97, drawn from 31/76 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Carlisle 24% | Draw 33% | Gillingham 43%, with Gillingham to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 33%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 28%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 56% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 36% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 40% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Carlisle 45%, Gillingham 36%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 45%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Carlisle's trading profile (76 games, 37 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 42% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gillingham's trading profile (76 games, 37 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Gillingham arrived the stronger side — 1.29 PPG against 0.67. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Carlisle (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.84 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.73 average — tighter than their form line. Gillingham (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.38 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights