🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Cambridge United run riot with a 5-0 hammering of Gillingham.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Cambridge United beat Gillingham 5-0 at Abbey Stadium, Regular Season - 37, in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cambridge United 1.23 xG and Gillingham 0.84 xG, a combined 2.07. The scoreboard read 5-0 for 5 actual goals. Cambridge United beat their projection by 3.8 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Gillingham landed 0.8 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cambridge United attack 1.13 / defence 0.84 against Gillingham attack 0.83 / defence 0.88, drawn from 35/81 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cambridge United 45% | Draw 29% | Gillingham 25%, with Cambridge United to win its most likely call at 45%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 61% and landed. Over 3.5 was 16% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 40% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 37% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cambridge United 40%, Gillingham 35%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cambridge United's trading profile (81 games, 40 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not.

Gillingham's trading profile (81 games, 40 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cambridge United 1.27 PPG, Gillingham 1.27 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Cambridge United win broke the near-deadlock. Cambridge United (home/away splits) scored 5 against a 1.32 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.12 average — tighter than their form line. Gillingham (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.90 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 5 against a 1.12 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights