Sign in Register

Cambridge United 5-0 Gillingham – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 37

Kick-off

Sat 14 Mar 2026

15:00

Venue

Abbey Stadium

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Cambridge United at 45% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Cambridge United vs Gillingham encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Cambridge United host Gillingham at Abbey Stadium in League Two, Regular Season - 37. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 14 March 2026 at 15:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Cambridge United — All Games: 6W 3D 1L from 10 League Two outings this season, averaging 2.10 points per game. Last five: W D W D D. They are averaging 2.00 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. Defensively, conceding just 0.80 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Cambridge United's form when playing at home: 6W 4D 0L across 10 games at Abbey Stadium this term (2.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Across all League Two games this season, Gillingham have recorded 3W 1D 6L from 10 outings — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L L W D L. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Gillingham's form when playing away from home: 3W 2D 5L across 10 road games this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

On current form, Cambridge United have the edge — a 1.10 PPG advantage (2.10 vs 1.00) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 0 wins for Cambridge United, 2 for Gillingham and 1 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The last 3 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.7 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 26 Dec 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Patterns

Cambridge United in-play and half-time data (81 games, 40 at home): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 35% of games (home games).

Gillingham in-play and half-time data (81 games, 40 at away): they score before half-time in 52% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 28% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Cambridge United 51% versus Gillingham 49%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Cambridge United 40% | Gillingham 35%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cambridge United 1.23 xG and Gillingham 0.84 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cambridge United attack 1.134 / defence 0.840 | Gillingham attack 0.834 / defence 0.875. League average goals — home 1.241 / away 1.196. Data: 35 Cambridge United games / 81 Gillingham games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Cambridge United 45% | Draw 29% | Gillingham 25%. Fair-value odds: Cambridge United 2.22 | Draw 3.45 | Gillingham 4.00. Cambridge United hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (29%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 34% | BTTS probability 40% | Total xG 2.07. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 66% probability — total xG of 2.07 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 40% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

Gillingham lead the H2H ledger, but Cambridge United carry stronger current form — do not let history alone dictate your assessment.

On the Poisson output, Cambridge United are the pick at 45% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 29% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Cambridge United offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 2.07 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 34% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 2.1 goals per game and H2H averaging 1.7 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 40%. Form rates corroborate: Cambridge United 60% | Gillingham 20% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Gillingham but Poisson model leans Cambridge United — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H (1.67 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.07) both back Under 2.5 goals (66% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 33% and Poisson BTTS 40% — BTTS No has double-source support.
Form Cambridge United lead on PPG: 2.10 vs 1.00 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Cambridge United Poisson xG (1.23) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.70) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~1.7 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.07) both support Under 2.5 goals (66% probability).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Cambridge United — Cambridge United at 45% win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 34% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
Contradiction Gillingham lead the H2H ledger, but Cambridge United carry stronger current form — do not let history alone dictate your assessment.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Cambridge United vs Gillingham | Competition: League Two, Regular Season - 37 | Venue: Abbey Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 14 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Cambridge United 45% | Draw 29% | Gillingham 25% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 34% | BTTS 40% | xG Cambridge United 1.23 / Gillingham 0.84 • Poisson strength factors: Cambridge United attack 1.134 / def 0.840 | Gillingham attack 0.834 / def 0.875 | league avg home 1.241 / away 1.196 • Poisson stance: Cambridge United (45%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.23

Cambridge United xG

Expected Goals

0.84

Gillingham xG

45%
29%
25%
Cambridge United Draw Gillingham

40%

BTTS

61%

Over 1.5

34%

Over 2.5

16%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Cambridge United vs Gillingham kick off?

Cambridge United vs Gillingham kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 14 March 2026 at Abbey Stadium.

What was the final score in Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

Cambridge United 5 - 0 Gillingham.

Where is Cambridge United vs Gillingham being played?

The match is being played at Abbey Stadium.

What competition is Cambridge United vs Gillingham part of?

Cambridge United vs Gillingham is a Regular Season - 37 fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

Our statistical model gives Cambridge United a 45% chance of winning, Gillingham a 25% chance, and a 29% chance of a draw — making Cambridge United the favourite.

Will both teams score in Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

Our model estimates a 40% probability that both Cambridge United and Gillingham will score (BTTS).

Will Cambridge United vs Gillingham have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 34%.

What is the head-to-head record between Cambridge United and Gillingham?

Record (3 meetings): Cambridge United 0W | Draws 1 | Gillingham 2W.

What form are Cambridge United and Gillingham in?

Cambridge United (all comps): 6W-3D-1L in 10 | 2.10 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 0.80 | L5 W-D-W-D-D. Gillingham (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.70 | L5 L-L-W-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Cambridge United's attacking strength (1.13x league average) is weighed against Gillingham's defensive record (0.88x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.23. The same calculation in reverse, Gillingham's attack versus Cambridge United's defence, projects 0.84 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 35/81 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 14.7%. Close behind: 0-0 (14.3%), 1-0 (13.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 43% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Cambridge United Win

45%

Cambridge United

2.20

29%

Draw

3.40

25%

Gillingham

3.97

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

15.5%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

13.0%

Draw

0 – 0

12.6%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.23

Cambridge United xG

Total xG

2.07

0.84

Gillingham xG

45%
29%
25%
Cambridge UnitedDrawGillingham

2.20

45%

Home win

3.40

29%

Draw

3.97

25%

Away win

Goals Markets

61%

Over 1.5

1.64

39%

Under 1.5

2.56

34%

Over 2.5

2.94

66%

Under 2.5

1.52

16%

Over 3.5

6.25

84%

Under 3.5

1.19

6%

Over 4.5

16.67

94%

Under 4.5

1.06

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

40%

BTTS Yes

2.49

60%

BTTS No

1.67

Clean Sheet

43%

Cambridge United

2.31

29%

Gillingham

3.42

Win to Nil

20%

Cambridge United

5.10

7%

Gillingham

13.58

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 12.6 10.6 4.4 1.2 0.3
1 15.5 13.0 5.5 1.5 0.3 0.1
2 9.6 8.0 3.4 0.9 0.2
3 3.9 3.3 1.4 0.4 0.1
4 1.2 1.0 0.4 0.1
5 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.231
λ Away (xG) 0.838
Total xG 2.069
League avg home goals 1.241
League avg away goals 1.196
Cambridge United attack strength 1.134
Cambridge United defence strength 0.840
Gillingham attack strength 0.834
Gillingham defence strength 0.875
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 35 / 81

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.7%.

How many goals are Cambridge United and Gillingham expected to score?

The model projects 1.23 expected goals for Cambridge United and 0.84 for Gillingham, a combined total of 2.07.

How confident is the prediction model for Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 45%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Cambridge United's recent record stands at 27W 22D 32L from 81 games, a 1.27 PPG return, with W-D-W-D-D in the last five.

Gillingham, meanwhile, have gone 25W 28D 28L across 81 games — 1.27 PPG, with L-L-W-D-L in their last five.

Form-wise this is close to level: Cambridge United on 1.27 PPG, Gillingham on 1.27. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

At home specifically, Cambridge United have managed 16W 11D 13L from 40 games — 1.48 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Gillingham's away record stands at 9W 16D 15L across 40 trips, a 1.08 PPG haul.

The Goals Picture

Cambridge United are averaging 1.17 goals scored and 1.25 conceded per game recently; Gillingham are on 1.04 scored and 1.15 conceded.

Last 81 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Cambridge United

Cambridge United

Current Season
W D W D D
Gillingham

Gillingham

Current Season
L L W D L
81 Played 81
27/22/32 W / D / L 25/28/28
1.27 Points Per Game 1.27
1.17 Avg Goals Scored 1.04
1.25 Avg Goals Conceded 1.15
2.42 Avg Goals / Game 2.19
20 Clean Sheets 25
41 BTTS 40
32 Over 2.5 Games 28
Cambridge United

Cambridge United

D
A Accrington ST
1–1 HT 0–1
07 Mar
D
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–1 HT 0–0
28 Feb
W
A Newport County
2–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Feb
W
H Bristol Rovers
3–1 HT 1–1
14 Feb
W
A Crawley Town
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Feb
L
A Harrogate Town
1–2 HT 1–2
07 Feb
W
A Oldham
3–0 HT 0–0
31 Jan
W
H Shrewsbury
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Jan
W
H Tranmere
4–2 HT 0–1
24 Jan
W
A Fleetwood Town
2–1 HT 1–0
17 Jan
W
H Walsall
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Jan
W
A Chesterfield
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Dec
D
A Gillingham
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Dec
W
H Accrington ST
2–0 HT 1–0
19 Dec
D
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–1 HT 0–1
13 Dec
D
H Chesterfield
1–1 HT 1–0
09 Dec
W
H Crewe
2–1 HT 0–0
29 Nov
W
A Barrow
2–0 HT 0–0
22 Nov
D
H Barnet
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Nov
D
A Salford City
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Nov
L
A Notts County
0–2 HT 0–0
25 Oct
W
H Bromley
2–1 HT 2–0
18 Oct
L
A Shrewsbury
0–2 HT 0–2
11 Oct
W
H Crawley Town
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Oct
D
A Tranmere
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Sep
W
H Fleetwood Town
2–1 HT 0–0
20 Sep
D
A Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–0
13 Sep
L
H Oldham
0–1 HT 0–1
06 Sep
W
H Newport County
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Aug
L
A Bristol Rovers
0–1 HT 0–1
23 Aug
W
A Colchester
2–1 HT 2–1
19 Aug
D
H Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Aug
L
A Swindon Town
2–3 HT 1–2
09 Aug
W
H Cheltenham
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Aug
L
H Birmingham
1–2 HT 1–1
03 May
L
A Burton Albion
1–2 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
H Leyton Orient
1–2 HT 1–0
21 Apr
W
A Huddersfield
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Apr
L
H Charlton
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Apr
W
A Shrewsbury
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
D
H Wrexham
2–2 HT 1–1
01 Apr
D
H Northampton
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
A Barnsley
1–1 HT 1–0
22 Mar
L
H Peterborough
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
A Blackpool
1–2 HT 1–1
11 Mar
L
A Wigan
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
H Stevenage
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Mar
W
A Crawley Town
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Mar
W
H Stockport County
2–0 HT 2–0
22 Feb
L
H Exeter City
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Feb
L
A Birmingham
0–4 HT 0–3
11 Feb
D
A Lincoln
1–1 HT 1–1
08 Feb
D
H Wycombe
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Feb
L
A Rotherham
1–2 HT 0–0
28 Jan
W
H Mansfield Town
3–2 HT 2–0
25 Jan
D
A Bolton
2–2 HT 2–1
18 Jan
L
H Bristol Rovers
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Jan
L
H Reading
1–3 HT 0–1
01 Jan
L
A Leyton Orient
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Dec
L
A Charlton
1–2 HT 0–2
26 Dec
L
H Huddersfield
0–4 HT 0–3
20 Dec
D
A Wrexham
2–2 HT 1–1
14 Dec
W
H Shrewsbury
4–1 HT 2–0
07 Dec
L
A Reading
0–3 HT 0–0
03 Dec
D
H Bolton
1–1 HT 0–0
26 Nov
D
A Northampton
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
H Barnsley
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Nov
L
A Peterborough
1–6 HT 0–4
09 Nov
W
H Burton Albion
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Oct
W
A Stevenage
2–0 HT 1–0
22 Oct
W
H Wigan
2–0 HT 2–0
19 Oct
L
A Exeter City
0–1 HT 0–1
05 Oct
L
H Rotherham
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Oct
L
H Lincoln
0–2 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
A Wycombe
1–2 HT 1–1
21 Sep
L
A Mansfield Town
1–2 HT 0–1
14 Sep
L
A Bristol Rovers
0–2 HT 0–1
31 Aug
D
H Blackpool
4–4 HT 1–3
24 Aug
L
H Crawley Town
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Aug
L
A Stockport County
0–2 HT 0–1
10 Aug
Gillingham

Gillingham

L
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–5 HT 0–3
10 Mar
D
H Fleetwood Town
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
W
A Barrow
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Feb
L
H Oldham
0–3 HT 0–2
21 Feb
L
A Chesterfield
0–1 HT 0–1
17 Feb
L
A Crewe
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Feb
W
H Tranmere
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Feb
L
A Notts County
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Feb
L
H Bromley
1–4 HT 1–3
31 Jan
W
A Harrogate Town
3–0 HT 0–0
24 Jan
W
H Newport County
3–2 HT 1–1
17 Jan
L
A Swindon Town
0–2 HT 0–0
01 Jan
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 0–0
29 Dec
D
H Cambridge United
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
A Fleetwood Town
1–2 HT 1–0
20 Dec
D
H Barrow
2–2 HT 2–0
13 Dec
D
A Colchester
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Dec
D
A Shrewsbury
3–3 HT 1–3
29 Nov
D
H Barnet
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
D
H Crawley Town
2–2 HT 1–0
15 Nov
W
A Bristol Rovers
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Nov
L
H Salford City
1–2 HT 1–2
25 Oct
L
A Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Oct
D
H Cheltenham
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Oct
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
2–3 HT 0–1
04 Oct
L
H Harrogate Town
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Sep
W
A Newport County
3–1 HT 3–1
20 Sep
W
H Notts County
1–0 HT 0–0
13 Sep
D
A Bromley
2–2 HT 0–2
06 Sep
W
A Oldham
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Aug
W
H Crewe
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Aug
W
H Chesterfield
4–1 HT 1–0
19 Aug
D
A Tranmere
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
H Walsall
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Aug
D
A Accrington ST
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Aug
W
A Port Vale
1–0 HT 0–0
03 May
D
H Swindon Town
1–1 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Apr
D
A Cheltenham
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Apr
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Apr
D
A Chesterfield
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Apr
D
A Salford City
2–2 HT 2–2
05 Apr
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Apr
D
A Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
H Walsall
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
D
A Accrington ST
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Mar
W
H Bradford
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Newport County
1–3 HT 0–3
04 Mar
W
H Morecambe
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
L
H Fleetwood Town
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Feb
D
A Carlisle
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
D
A Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Feb
L
A Barrow
0–3 HT 0–0
08 Feb
L
H Notts County
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Feb
D
A Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Jan
D
A Tranmere
1–1 HT 1–1
25 Jan
L
H Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Jan
L
H Bromley
0–3 HT 0–2
02 Jan
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Dec
L
A Colchester
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
D
H Cheltenham
2–2 HT 1–1
20 Dec
W
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Dec
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Dec
L
A Bromley
1–2 HT 0–0
04 Dec
L
H Harrogate Town
1–2 HT 0–0
23 Nov
W
H Port Vale
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Nov
D
A Swindon Town
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Oct
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–2
22 Oct
L
A Bradford
1–2 HT 1–2
19 Oct
L
H Accrington ST
1–2 HT 0–0
12 Oct
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
05 Oct
L
H Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Oct
W
H Barrow
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
A Notts County
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H Tranmere
3–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
L
A Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
07 Sep
W
H Chesterfield
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Aug
D
A Fleetwood Town
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
W
A Morecambe
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
H Carlisle
4–1 HT 1–0
10 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Cambridge United and Gillingham in coming into this match?

Cambridge United have gone 27W 22D 32L in their last 81 games (1.27 PPG), while Gillingham have gone 25W 28D 28L in their last 81 (1.27 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Cambridge United at home or Gillingham away?

Cambridge United's home record (1.48 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Cambridge United at home: 1.48 PPG; Gillingham away: 1.08 PPG.

Have Cambridge United or Gillingham been keeping clean sheets recently?

Cambridge United have kept a clean sheet in 25% of their recent games, Gillingham in 31%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Cambridge United and Gillingham runs to 4 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to September 2021. The pairing has crossed competitions too — League One, League Two all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 14 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The biggest gap between the sides came on 14 Mar 2026, when Cambridge United won 5-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Cambridge United's record when hosting Gillingham specifically: 1W 0D 1L from 2 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 4 Meetings

Cambridge United

1

Cambridge United

1

Draws

Gillingham

2

Gillingham

Recent Meetings

Cambridge United
5–0
14 Mar 26
Gillingham
Gillingham
1–1
26 Dec 25
Cambridge United
Gillingham
1–0
08 Feb 22
Cambridge United
Cambridge United
0–2
28 Sep 21
Gillingham

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Cambridge United and Gillingham?

From 4 meetings on record, Cambridge United have won 1, Gillingham have won 2, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Cambridge United and Gillingham last play each other?

They last met on 14 March 2026, when Cambridge United 5-0 Gillingham.

Who has won more matches between Cambridge United and Gillingham?

Gillingham have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Cambridge United are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time.

Gillingham see a goal before the break in 52% of their matches.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Cambridge United 52%, Gillingham 48% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Low-scoring games have been more typical here — Over 2.5 sits at just 35% for Cambridge United and 28% for Gillingham.

On the defensive side: Cambridge United have failed to score in 28% of games; Gillingham in 32%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Cambridge United home games / Gillingham away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Cambridge United Cambridge United Current Season
Metric All
(81 games)
Venue
(40 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 55/81
(67.9%)
27/40
(67.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 24/81
(29.6%)
12/40
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 22/26
(84.6%)
12/13
(92.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 12/26
(46.2%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Winning at HT 22/81
(27.2%)
12/40
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/81
(8.6%)
3/40
(7.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/81
(7.4%)
4/40
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 41/81
(50.6%)
21/40
(52.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/81
(39.5%)
14/40
(35%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/81
(17.3%)
9/40
(22.5%)
Clean Sheet 20/81
(24.7%)
9/40
(22.5%)
Failed to Score 24/81
(29.6%)
11/40
(27.5%)
Gillingham Gillingham Current Season
Metric All
(81 games)
Venue
(40 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 44/81
(54.3%)
21/40
(52.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/81
(24.7%)
8/40
(20%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 32/37
(86.5%)
16/19
(84.2%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 14/37
(37.8%)
7/19
(36.8%)
Winning at HT 13/81
(16%)
6/40
(15%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/81
(7.4%)
4/40
(10%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/81
(7.4%)
4/40
(10%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 40/81
(49.4%)
19/40
(47.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 28/81
(34.6%)
11/40
(27.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/81
(17.3%)
6/40
(15%)
Clean Sheet 25/81
(30.9%)
11/40
(27.5%)
Failed to Score 21/81
(25.9%)
13/40
(32.5%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Cambridge United play Gillingham?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 52% of Cambridge United's recent matches and 48% of Gillingham's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Cambridge United vs Gillingham usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 35% of Cambridge United's recent games and 28% of Gillingham's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Cambridge United and Gillingham tend to score early?

Cambridge United have had a goal before half-time in 68% of their recent matches, Gillingham in 52% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Cambridge United run riot with a 5-0 hammering of Gillingham.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Cambridge United beat Gillingham 5-0 at Abbey Stadium, Regular Season - 37, in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cambridge United 1.23 xG and Gillingham 0.84 xG, a combined 2.07. The scoreboard read 5-0 for 5 actual goals. Cambridge United beat their projection by 3.8 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Gillingham landed 0.8 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cambridge United attack 1.13 / defence 0.84 against Gillingham attack 0.83 / defence 0.88, drawn from 35/81 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cambridge United 45% | Draw 29% | Gillingham 25%, with Cambridge United to win its most likely call at 45%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 61% and landed. Over 3.5 was 16% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 40% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 37% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cambridge United 40%, Gillingham 35%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cambridge United's trading profile (81 games, 40 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not.

Gillingham's trading profile (81 games, 40 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cambridge United 1.27 PPG, Gillingham 1.27 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Cambridge United win broke the near-deadlock. Cambridge United (home/away splits) scored 5 against a 1.32 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.12 average — tighter than their form line. Gillingham (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.90 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 5 against a 1.12 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 34% Over 2.5 probability, but 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 40% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data bucked — 37% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.