🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Gillingham edge out Barrow 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gillingham beat Barrow 0-1 at Holker Street, Regular Season - 35, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Barrow 0.78 xG and Gillingham 1.15 xG, a combined 1.93. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Barrow attack 0.69 / defence 1.14 against Gillingham attack 0.85 / defence 0.91, drawn from 78/78 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Barrow 25% | Draw 31% | Gillingham 44%, with Gillingham to win its most likely call at 44%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 31%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 58% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 37% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Barrow 47%, Gillingham 35%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Barrow's trading profile (78 games, 38 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gillingham's trading profile (78 games, 38 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Barrow 1.10 PPG, Gillingham 1.27 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gillingham win broke the near-deadlock. Barrow (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.18 scoring average — below par going forward. Gillingham (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.18 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A strong night for the model: the result sat comfortably inside what the pre-match data projected.

💡 Key Insights