🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Notts County at 43% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Accrington ST vs Notts County encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Notts County make the trip to Wham Stadium to face Accrington ST in League Two, Regular Season - 27. The match kicks off on Saturday 18 January 2025 at 15:00 UTC.

Form

Accrington ST (all games): 3W 3D 4L across 10 League Two fixtures this term — 1.20 PPG. Last five: D L L W W. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.80 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Accrington ST, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Accrington ST's form when playing at home: 3W 4D 3L across 10 games at Wham Stadium this term (1.30 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Notts County's overall League Two record this term: 4W 2D 4L from 10 games (1.40 PPG). Last five: W W W L W. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.40. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for Notts County, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Notts County have gone 3W 4D 3L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.20 for Accrington ST, 1.40 for Notts County — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Accrington ST have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Notts County in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 3 meetings: Accrington ST 0W, Notts County 2W, 1D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.3 per game across 3 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 7 Sep 2024, ended 0–2 with Notts County winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.3 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

Accrington ST goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (69 games, 34 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 81% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (home games).

Notts County goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (69 games, 34 at away): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 77% of the time; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Accrington ST 62% and Notts County 61% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Accrington ST 64% | Notts County 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Accrington ST 1.59 xG and Notts County 1.81 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Accrington ST attack 1.047 / defence 1.190 | Notts County attack 1.294 / defence 1.139. League average goals — home 1.332 / away 1.178. Notts County have an above-average attack strength of 1.294 — the away xG of 1.81 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 69 Accrington ST games / 70 Notts County games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Accrington ST 33% | Draw 24% | Notts County 43%. Fair-value odds: Accrington ST 3.03 | Draw 4.17 | Notts County 2.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 66% | BTTS probability 67% | Total xG 3.40. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 66% — a total xG of 3.40 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 67% reflects that both xG figures (1.59 / 1.81) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Notts County as the most likely outcome at 43% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Notts County if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.40 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 66% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.3 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 67% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Accrington ST 60% | Notts County 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights