🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Port Vale at 40% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Port Vale vs AFC Wimbledon encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Port Vale and AFC Wimbledon meet at Vale Park in League One, Regular Season - 29. This fixture gets under way on Tuesday 3 February 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Current Form

Port Vale's overall League One record this term: 2W 1D 7L from 10 games (0.70 PPG). Last five: L W L L W. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Port Vale, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Port Vale's home record at Vale Park: 2W 2D 6L from 10 League One appearances (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

AFC Wimbledon have collected 0.60 PPG across 10 League One outings this season: 1W 3D 6L. Last five: W L L D L. Their scoring rate of 0.50 per game is modest, conceding 1.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for AFC Wimbledon, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, AFC Wimbledon have gone 4W 2D 4L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.40 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.40 exceeds their overall 0.60 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

A near-identical PPG reading — 0.70 for Port Vale, 0.60 for AFC Wimbledon — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Port Vale, 0 for AFC Wimbledon and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 3 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 11 Oct 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Port Vale half-time and goal-timing data (72 games, 35 at home): they score before half-time in 51% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 74% of the time; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); they fail to score in 36% of games.

AFC Wimbledon half-time and goal-timing data (72 games, 35 at away): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 79% of the time; BTTS occurs in 49% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (away games); they fail to score in 36% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Port Vale 42% versus AFC Wimbledon 36%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Port Vale 43% | AFC Wimbledon 36%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Port Vale 1.49 xG and AFC Wimbledon 1.38 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Port Vale attack 0.847 / defence 1.273 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.994 / defence 1.296. League average goals — home 1.361 / away 1.094. AFC Wimbledon bring a strong defensive rating of 1.296 — this is suppressing Port Vale's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 26 Port Vale games / 27 AFC Wimbledon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Port Vale 40% | Draw 25% | AFC Wimbledon 35%. Fair-value odds: Port Vale 2.50 | Draw 4.00 | AFC Wimbledon 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 55% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 2.88. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 55% — the 2.88 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Port Vale are the pick at 40% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Port Vale if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.88 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 55% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 58% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Port Vale 40% | AFC Wimbledon 60%.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights