🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 36% as Burnley take on Leeds.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Burnley host Leeds at Turf Moor in Championship, Regular Season - 29. Kick-off is scheduled for Monday 27 January 2025 at 20:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Championship games this season, Burnley have gone 5W 5D 0L from 10 outings — a 2.00 PPG return. Last five: D D W D W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 0.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Defensively, conceding just 0.30 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 7 clean sheets from 10 games (70%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes.

Burnley at Turf Moor this season: 4W 6D 0L from 10 home games — 1.80 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 0.70 goals scored and 0.20 conceded per game. 8 clean sheets from 10 home games (80%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Turf Moor. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Leeds — All Games: 7W 3D 0L from 10 Championship fixtures this season — 2.40 PPG. Last five: W D D W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.20 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. Defensively, 0.60 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 6 clean sheets from 10 games (60%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not.

Leeds away from home this season: 3W 5D 2L from 10 away games — 1.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 1.40 is notably below their overall 2.40 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form comparison is too close to call — 2.00 PPG (Burnley) versus 2.40 (Leeds). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for Burnley, 1 for Leeds and 1 shared spoils from 3 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 3 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 14 Sep 2024, ended 1–0 with Burnley winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Patterns

Burnley in-play and half-time data (66 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 46% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 38% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Leeds in-play and half-time data (66 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 72% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; they lead at the break 46% of the time; BTTS occurs in 38% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 34% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 48% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Burnley 47% versus Leeds 38%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Burnley 44% | Leeds 47%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Burnley 0.84 xG and Leeds 0.86 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Burnley attack 0.675 / defence 0.671 | Leeds attack 1.227 / defence 0.899. League average goals — home 1.386 / away 1.041. Burnley's attack strength of 0.675 is below the league average — the 0.84 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Leeds have an above-average attack strength of 1.227 — the away xG of 0.86 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Burnley's defence rating of 0.671 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 28 Burnley games / 74 Leeds games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Burnley 32% | Draw 36% | Leeds 32%. Fair-value odds: Burnley 3.12 | Draw 2.78 | Leeds 3.12. The draw (36%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 24% | BTTS probability 34% | Total xG 1.70. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 76% probability — total xG of 1.70 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS No has firm model support at 66% — Burnley's lower xG of 0.84 creates a meaningful probability of a scoring blank, which suppresses the BTTS Yes probability to 34%.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 36% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 32% and away win at 32% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

The Poisson model projects 1.70 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 24% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 1.8 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 34% on No. Form rates corroborate: Burnley 20% | Leeds 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights