Sign in Register

Wuhan Zall 1-2 SHANGHAI SIPG – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 6

Kick-off

Sat 25 Jun 2022

12:30

Venue

Puwan Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Wuhan Zall at 36%, yet in-form SHANGHAI SIPG provide a compelling counter-argument — this Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Puwan Stadium plays host to Wuhan Zall versus SHANGHAI SIPG in Super League (matchday 6). Kick-off: Saturday 25 June 2022 at 13:30 UK time.

Form

Wuhan Zall (all games): 3W 4D 3L across their last 10 — 1.30 PPG. Last five: D L D L L. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.30 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters, Wuhan Zall have posted 2W 6D 2L from their last 10 home games — 1.20 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

SHANGHAI SIPG have collected 2.00 PPG across their last 10 games: 6W 2D 2L. Last five: D W W D W. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 0.80. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity.

SHANGHAI SIPG's form when playing away from home: 3W 5D 2L across their last 10 road games (1.40 PPG). Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.40 is notably below their overall 2.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness recently.

On a straight form reading, SHANGHAI SIPG are the stronger side — 0.70 PPG clear of the hosts (2.00 vs 1.30). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (from Wuhan Zall's last 10 home games and SHANGHAI SIPG's last 10 away games) — Wuhan Zall have seen both teams score in 80% of their games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 3 H2H matches in our data, the wins are level at 1 apiece, with 1 draw. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 3 H2H matches to go on, treat this as a light input.

Scoring has been limited in the 3 H2H matches in our data, averaging 1.3 goals per game, which makes Under 2.5 the head-to-head-backed angle in the goals market. The most recent of those, on 4 Jun 2022, ended Wuhan Zall 1–0 SHANGHAI SIPG — a Wuhan Zall win.

With a balanced win record and just 1.3 goals per game, the H2H data points toward a tight, low-scoring contest — Under 2.5 is the stronger head-to-head angle regardless of which side wins.

Trading Data

Wuhan Zall goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (last 22 games, 11 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 73% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 43% of the time; BTTS occurs in 82% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); they fail to score in 36% of games.

SHANGHAI SIPG goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (last 22 games, 11 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 54% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; they lead at the break 54% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 50% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Zall 64% versus SHANGHAI SIPG 41%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Zall 41% | SHANGHAI SIPG 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Zall 1.32 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 1.29 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Zall attack 1.057 / defence 1.191 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 0.937 / defence 0.956. League average goals — home 1.302 / away 1.152. Data: built from Wuhan Zall's last 19 games and SHANGHAI SIPG's last 19.

Result probabilities: Wuhan Zall 36% | Draw 30% | SHANGHAI SIPG 34%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Zall 2.82 | Draw 3.29 | SHANGHAI SIPG 2.93. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS Yes probability 55% | Total xG 2.60. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.60 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS Yes at 55% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Wuhan Zall as the most likely outcome at 36% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form SHANGHAI SIPG (2.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — the model adjusts for opposition strength, which raw form results do not. Draw probability of 30% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Zall if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.60 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 52% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by the H2H data averaging 1.3 goals per game across 3 H2H matches.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 55% on Yes. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Wuhan Zall 80% (last 10 home games) | SHANGHAI SIPG 60% (last 10 away games).

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (Wuhan Zall 1W, 1D, SHANGHAI SIPG 1W from the 3 H2H matches in our data), with no clear advantage.
Goals The H2H data only shows 1.33 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.60 — the model's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG lead on PPG: 2.00 vs 1.30 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Goals Form only shows ~2.0 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.60 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Wuhan Zall 8/10 home, SHANGHAI SIPG 6/10 away) and the Poisson model (BTTS Yes 55%).
Form Form (PPG) favours SHANGHAI SIPG but Poisson leans Wuhan Zall (36%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 30% — tight contest expected.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG | Competition: Super League, matchday 6 | Venue: Puwan Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 25 June 2022 at 13:30 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Zall 36% | Draw 30% | SHANGHAI SIPG 34% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 48% (Under 52%) | BTTS Yes 55% (No 45%) | xG Wuhan Zall 1.32 / SHANGHAI SIPG 1.29 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Zall attack 1.057 / def 1.191 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 0.937 / def 0.956 | league avg home 1.302 / away 1.152 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Zall (36%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.32

Wuhan Zall xG

Expected Goals

1.29

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

36%
30%
34%
Wuhan Zall Draw SHANGHAI SIPG

55%

BTTS

75%

Over 1.5

48%

Over 2.5

26%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG FAQs

What time does Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG kick off?

Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG kicked off at 13:30 UK time on Saturday 25 June 2022 at Puwan Stadium.

What was the final score in Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Wuhan Zall 1 - 2 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Where is Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG being played?

The match is being played at Puwan Stadium.

What competition is Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG part of?

Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG is a Super League fixture (matchday 6) (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Zall a 36% chance of winning, SHANGHAI SIPG a 34% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Zall the favourite.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our model estimates a 55% probability that both Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.

Will Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 48%, so it leans towards under 2.5 goals (52%).

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from Wuhan Zall's attack rating (1.06) and SHANGHAI SIPG's defence rating (0.96), the model arrives at 1.32 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — SHANGHAI SIPG's attack (0.94x) against Wuhan Zall's defence (1.19x) — and the away total comes out at 1.29.

These ratings are built from Wuhan Zall's last 19 games and SHANGHAI SIPG's last 19 — a full enough recent sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 14.2%. Close behind: 0-0 (9.0%), 2-1 (8.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Zall Win

36%

Wuhan Zall

2.82

30%

Draw

3.29

34%

SHANGHAI SIPG

2.93

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.5%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

9.8%

Home win

0 – 1

9.5%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.32

Wuhan Zall xG

Total xG

2.60

1.29

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

36%
30%
34%
Wuhan ZallDrawSHANGHAI SIPG

2.82

36%

Home win

3.29

30%

Draw

2.93

34%

Away win

Goals Markets

73%

Over 1.5

1.37

27%

Under 1.5

3.70

48%

Over 2.5

2.08

52%

Under 2.5

1.92

26%

Over 3.5

3.85

74%

Under 3.5

1.35

12%

Over 4.5

8.33

88%

Under 4.5

1.14

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

55%

BTTS Yes

1.82

45%

BTTS No

2.22

Clean Sheet

28%

Wuhan Zall

3.62

27%

SHANGHAI SIPG

3.73

Win to Nil

10%

Wuhan Zall

10.19

9%

SHANGHAI SIPG

10.93

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 7.4 9.5 6.1 2.6 0.8 0.2
1 9.8 12.5 8.1 3.5 1.1 0.3
2 6.4 8.3 5.3 2.3 0.7 0.2
3 2.8 3.6 2.3 1.0 0.3 0.1
4 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 –
5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 – –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.316
λ Away (xG) 1.286
Total xG 2.602
League avg home goals 1.302
League avg away goals 1.152
Wuhan Zall attack strength 1.057
Wuhan Zall defence strength 1.191
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 0.937
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 0.956
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 19 / 19

❓ Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG Prediction FAQs

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.2%.

How many goals are Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG expected to score?

The model projects 1.32 expected goals for Wuhan Zall and 1.29 for SHANGHAI SIPG, a combined total of 2.60.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 36%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 22 outings, Wuhan Zall have picked up 0.91 PPG on a 3W 11D 8L record — D-L-D-L-L across the most recent five.

SHANGHAI SIPG's form line: 13W 6D 3L from 22 games, 2.05 PPG, last five D-W-W-D-W.

Put side by side, SHANGHAI SIPG are the form team by 1.14 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Wuhan Zall.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Wuhan Zall have posted 1.09 PPG from their last 11 home games (2W 6D 3L).

On the road, SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 4W 5D 2L from their last 11 away games — 1.55 PPG when travelling. That's a step down from their 2.05 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of SHANGHAI SIPG's recent record.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, SHANGHAI SIPG come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Wuhan Zall are averaging 1.05 goals scored and 1.36 conceded per game recently; SHANGHAI SIPG are on 1.91 scored and 0.64 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Wuhan Zall have seen both teams score in 64% of their recent games.

Defensively: SHANGHAI SIPG in 50% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 22 Results

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Zall

Wuhan Zall

Blended
D L D L L
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Blended
D W W D W
22 Played 22
3/11/8 W / D / L 13/6/3
0.91 Points Per Game 2.05
1.05 Avg Goals Scored 1.91
1.36 Avg Goals Conceded 0.64
2.41 Avg Goals / Game 2.55
4 Clean Sheets 11
14 BTTS 9
9 Over 2.5 Games 11
Wuhan Zall

Wuhan Zall

L
H Chongqing Lifan
1–2 HT 1–0
03 Jan
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–1
31 Dec
D
H Qingdao Huanghai
1–1 HT 0–0
28 Dec
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Dec
D
A Chongqing Lifan
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Dec
D
H Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
A Qingdao Huanghai
5–2 HT 1–2
15 Dec
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–2 HT 2–1
12 Dec
D
H Hebei Zhongji
1–1 HT 1–1
15 Aug
W
H Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 2–1
12 Aug
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–1
09 Aug
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
06 Aug
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
03 Aug
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–1
31 Jul
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Jul
D
A Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Jul
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–1
17 May
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–1
10 May
D
A Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 1–1
29 Apr
D
A Hebei Zhongji
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Apr
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 1–0
04 Jan
D
A Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–1
01 Jan
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Dec
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–1 HT 1–1
26 Dec
D
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Dec
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Dec
W
H Guangzhou R&F
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Dec
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–1 HT 2–0
13 Dec
W
H Tianjin Teda
5–0 HT 2–0
15 Aug
L
A Hebei Zhongji
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
H Wuhan Zall
3–0 HT 1–0
09 Aug
W
A Dalian Aerbin
5–0 HT 2–0
06 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
1–2 HT 0–0
03 Aug
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
28 Jul
W
H Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Jul
D
A Wuhan Zall
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Jul
W
H Dalian Aerbin
3–0 HT 2–0
16 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
11 May
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
05 May
W
H Beijing Guoan
3–1 HT 2–1
28 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
6–1 HT 2–0
22 Apr

Wuhan Zall (Home) vs SHANGHAI SIPG (Away)

Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side

Wuhan Zall

Wuhan Zall

Blended
D W D D L
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Blended
L W D W D
11 Played 11
2/6/3 W / D / L 4/5/2
1.09 Points Per Game 1.55
1.27 Avg Goals Scored 1.91
1.45 Avg Goals Conceded 0.91
2.73 Avg Goals / Game 2.82
1 Clean Sheets 3
9 BTTS 7
5 Over 2.5 Games 6
Wuhan Zall

Wuhan Zall — Home

L
Chongqing Lifan
1–2 HT 1–0
03 Jan
D
Qingdao Huanghai
1–1 HT 0–0
28 Dec
D
Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–2 HT 2–1
12 Dec
D
Hebei Zhongji
1–1 HT 1–1
15 Aug
W
Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 2–1
12 Aug
D
Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
06 Aug
D
Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–1
31 Jul
D
SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Jul
L
Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–1
10 May
L
Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 1–1
29 Apr
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG — Away

D
Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–1
01 Jan
W
Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Dec
D
Guangzhou Evergrande FC
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Dec
W
Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–1 HT 2–0
13 Dec
L
Hebei Zhongji
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
Dalian Aerbin
5–0 HT 2–0
06 Aug
L
Changchun Yatai
1–2 HT 0–0
03 Aug
D
Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
28 Jul
D
Wuhan Zall
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Jul
D
Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
05 May
W
Tianjin Teda
6–1 HT 2–0
22 Apr

❓ Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG Form FAQs

What form are Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG in coming into this match?

Wuhan Zall have gone 3W 11D 8L in their last 22 games (0.91 PPG), while SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 13W 6D 3L in their last 22 (2.05 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Zall at home or SHANGHAI SIPG away?

SHANGHAI SIPG's away record (1.55 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Zall at home: 1.09 PPG; SHANGHAI SIPG away: 1.55 PPG.

Have Wuhan Zall or SHANGHAI SIPG been keeping clean sheets recently?

Wuhan Zall have kept a clean sheet in 18% of their recent games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 50%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

We have 4 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to July 2021 — a small sample, so read the trends with care. All of them came in Super League. The most recent in our data was on 25 June 2022, some 4 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: SHANGHAI SIPG won SHANGHAI SIPG 3-0 Wuhan Zall on 9 Aug 2021, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Wuhan Zall have gone 0W 1D 1L from the 2 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against SHANGHAI SIPG — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

Wuhan Zall

1

Wuhan Zall

1

Draws

SHANGHAI SIPG

2

SHANGHAI SIPG

Recent Meetings

Wuhan Zall
1–2
25 Jun 22
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1
04 Jun 22
Wuhan Zall
SHANGHAI SIPG
3–0
09 Aug 21
Wuhan Zall
Wuhan Zall
0–0
19 Jul 21
SHANGHAI SIPG

❓ Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG H2H FAQs

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG?

Across the 4 head-to-head matches in our data, Wuhan Zall have won 1, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 2, and 1 has been drawn.

When did Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG last play each other?

The most recent meeting in our data was on 25 June 2022: Wuhan Zall 1-2 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG?

SHANGHAI SIPG have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from the 4 head-to-head matches in our data.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Wuhan Zall are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 73% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 27% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 33% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

SHANGHAI SIPG see a goal before the break in 54% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 36% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 50% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 82% for Wuhan Zall, 64% for SHANGHAI SIPG — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 46% (Wuhan Zall) and 54% (SHANGHAI SIPG).

On the defensive side: SHANGHAI SIPG in 27%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Zall home games / SHANGHAI SIPG away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Zall Wuhan Zall Blended
Metric All
(22 games)
Venue
(11 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 15/22
(68.2%)
8/11
(72.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 9/22
(40.9%)
6/11
(54.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/7
(42.9%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/7
(42.9%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 3/22
(13.6%)
3/11
(27.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/3
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/7
(14.3%)
0/1
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 14/22
(63.6%)
9/11
(81.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 9/22
(40.9%)
5/11
(45.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/22
(18.2%)
3/11
(27.3%)
Clean Sheet 4/22
(18.2%)
1/11
(9.1%)
Failed to Score 8/22
(36.4%)
2/11
(18.2%)
SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Blended
Metric All
(22 games)
Venue
(11 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 16/22
(72.7%)
6/11
(54.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/22
(36.4%)
4/11
(36.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/6
(50%)
3/5
(60%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/6
(50%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 12/22
(54.5%)
4/11
(36.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/12
(0%)
0/4
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/3
(33.3%)
1/2
(50%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 9/22
(40.9%)
7/11
(63.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 11/22
(50%)
6/11
(54.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 7/22
(31.8%)
4/11
(36.4%)
Clean Sheet 11/22
(50%)
3/11
(27.3%)
Failed to Score 5/22
(22.7%)
3/11
(27.3%)

❓ Wuhan Zall vs SHANGHAI SIPG Trading FAQs

Do both teams usually score in Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG matches?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 82% of Wuhan Zall's games and 64% of SHANGHAI SIPG's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Are Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG matches usually high-scoring?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 46% of Wuhan Zall's recent games and 54% of SHANGHAI SIPG's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Wuhan Zall and SHANGHAI SIPG matches tend to have early goals?

There has been at least one first-half goal in 73% of Wuhan Zall's recent matches and 54% of SHANGHAI SIPG's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as SHANGHAI SIPG defy the odds to beat Wuhan Zall 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

SHANGHAI SIPG beat Wuhan Zall 1-2 at Puwan Stadium, Regular Season - 6, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Zall 1.32 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 1.29 xG, a combined 2.60. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Zall attack 1.06 / defence 1.19 against SHANGHAI SIPG attack 0.94 / defence 0.96, drawn from 19/19 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Zall 36% | Draw 30% | SHANGHAI SIPG 34%, with Wuhan Zall to win its most likely call at 36%. The actual SHANGHAI SIPG win had been the model's second-ranked read at 34%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 48%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 75% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 55% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 45% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Zall 41%, SHANGHAI SIPG 50%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Zall's trading profile (22 games, 11 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did.

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (22 games, 11 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 50% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, SHANGHAI SIPG arrived the stronger side — 2.05 PPG against 0.91. That form edge translated into the three points.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 48% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 55% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 45% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.

More Super League fixtures — matchday 6

All Super League fixtures →