🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Shandong Luneng (48%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Wuhan Three Towns face Shandong Luneng.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Super League clash, Regular Season - 30 as Wuhan Three Towns welcome Shandong Luneng to Wuhan Sports Centre. Kick-off is set for Saturday 22 November 2025 at 07:30 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Super League games this season, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 1W 1D 8L from 10 outings — a 0.40 PPG return. Last five: L L D L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 2.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.30 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

At home at Wuhan Sports Centre, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 2W 4D 4L this season (10 games, 1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — Wuhan Three Towns are significantly better at Wuhan Sports Centre than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Shandong Luneng stand at 6W 4D 0L from 10 Super League matches — 2.20 PPG. Last five: D D D W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.70 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

Shandong Luneng away from home this season: 1W 5D 4L from 10 away games — 0.80 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.80 is notably below their overall 2.20 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Shandong Luneng are 1.80 PPG ahead (2.20 vs 0.40), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Wuhan Three Towns register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Shandong Luneng in 80% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

Despite the anticipated home advantage, Shandong Luneng have the better historical record — 3 wins from 7 previous contests against 0 for Wuhan Three Towns.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 25 Jun 2025, ended 1–3 with Shandong Luneng winning.

It is worth noting that Shandong Luneng have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 3 wins from 7 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading Patterns

Wuhan Three Towns in-play and half-time data (59 games, 29 at home): they score before half-time in 76% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 55% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%; they fail to score in 34% of games.

Shandong Luneng in-play and half-time data (59 games, 29 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 66% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 48%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 58% versus Shandong Luneng 61%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 52% | Shandong Luneng 66%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.62 xG and Shandong Luneng 2.06 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.850 / defence 1.205 | Shandong Luneng attack 1.194 / defence 1.076. League average goals — home 1.774 / away 1.436. Data: 59 Wuhan Three Towns games / 59 Shandong Luneng games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 31% | Draw 21% | Shandong Luneng 48%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 3.23 | Draw 4.76 | Shandong Luneng 2.08. Shandong Luneng hold a narrow Poisson edge at 48% — the draw (21%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 71% | BTTS probability 70% | Total xG 3.69. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 71% — a total xG of 3.69 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 70% reflects that both xG figures (1.62 / 2.06) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Shandong Luneng are the pick at 48% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.69 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 71% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 70% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Wuhan Three Towns 60% | Shandong Luneng 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights