Sign in Register

Qingdao Youth Island 1-1 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 19

Kick-off

Fri 17 Jul 2026

11:00

Venue

Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Qingdao Youth Island at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Qingdao Youth Island host Chengdu Better City at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center in Super League, Regular Season - 19. Kick-off is scheduled for Friday 17 July 2026 at 11:00 UTC.

Betting Odds

The market has installed Chengdu Better City as the clear favourite — Qingdao Youth Island 4.14 (implied 23%), Draw 3.79 (25%), Chengdu Better City 1.76 (implied 53%).

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Qingdao Youth Island stand at 4W 5D 1L from 10 Super League matches — 1.70 PPG. Last five: W D W W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.50 conceded. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for Qingdao Youth Island, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Qingdao Youth Island's home record at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center: 4W 6D 0L from 10 Super League appearances (1.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 6W 2D 2L from 10 outings — 2.00 PPG. Last five: L W W D D. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.00. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chengdu Better City away from home this season: 6W 3D 1L from 10 away games — 2.10 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — Qingdao Youth Island at 1.70 PPG versus Chengdu Better City's 2.00. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Qingdao Youth Island, 2 for Chengdu Better City and 3 shared spoils from 5 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 5 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 4.2 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 3 Apr 2026, ended 1–5 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.2 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

Qingdao Youth Island in-play and half-time data (48 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 35%.

Chengdu Better City in-play and half-time data (48 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; they lead at the break 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Qingdao Youth Island 62% and Chengdu Better City 60% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Qingdao Youth Island 50% | Chengdu Better City 56%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Qingdao Youth Island 1.38 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.29 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.923 / defence 0.834 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.133 / defence 0.847. League average goals — home 1.760 / away 1.367. Data: 48 Qingdao Youth Island games / 48 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Qingdao Youth Island 39% | Draw 26% | Chengdu Better City 35%. Fair-value odds: Qingdao Youth Island 2.56 | Draw 3.85 | Chengdu Better City 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 50% | BTTS probability 54% | Total xG 2.67. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 50%/50% — the total xG of 2.67 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 54% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

Poisson rates Qingdao Youth Island at 39% but the market prices Chengdu Better City shorter — model and market disagree on the likely winner; consider draw no bet on the home side.

The Poisson model's primary lean is Qingdao Youth Island at 39% — marginal model lean. The model sees Qingdao Youth Island as more likely than the market's pricing reflects — Poisson 39% versus the market's fair-implied 23% (priced at 4.14). With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Qingdao Youth Island offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.67 combined xG gives a 50% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration — though H2H averaging only 4.2 goals per meeting points in the other direction. The market (2.09, fair-implied 45%) is broadly in line with the Poisson probability.

Poisson assigns a 54% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Qingdao Youth Island 70% | Chengdu Better City 70% BTTS from recent games. Market pricing (1.65, fair-implied 56%) is broadly in line with the Poisson read on BTTS.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–3D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Chengdu Better City but Poisson model leans Qingdao Youth Island — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H (4.20 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.67) both back Over 2.5 goals (50% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 80% and Poisson BTTS 54% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (1.29) is below their form scoring rate (1.70) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Qingdao Youth Island 7/10, Chengdu Better City 7/10) and Poisson model (54%).
Market Poisson favours Qingdao Youth Island (39%) but market has Chengdu Better City shorter — potential home value if Poisson inputs are trusted.
Market Qingdao Youth Island Win: Poisson 39% vs market fair-implied 23% at 4.14.
Market Chengdu Better City Win: Poisson 35% vs market fair-implied 53% at 1.76.
Contradiction Poisson rates Qingdao Youth Island at 39% but the market prices Chengdu Better City shorter — model and market disagree on the likely winner; consider draw no bet on the home side.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 19 | Venue: Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center • Kick-off: Friday 17 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Qingdao Youth Island 39% | Draw 26% | Chengdu Better City 35% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 50% | BTTS 54% | xG Qingdao Youth Island 1.38 / Chengdu Better City 1.29 • Poisson strength factors: Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.923 / def 0.834 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.133 / def 0.847 | league avg home 1.760 / away 1.367 • Poisson stance: Qingdao Youth Island (39%) — low confidence — close contest

🎲 Betting Market Intelligence

• 1X2 market: Qingdao Youth Island 4.14 (impl 23%) | Draw 3.79 (impl 25%) | Chengdu Better City 1.76 (impl 53%) • Market favourite: Chengdu Better City at 1.76 • Poisson vs market contradiction: market prices Chengdu Better City as favourite (implied 53%) but Poisson rates Qingdao Youth Island higher at 39% — model diverges from the market; potential value on the home side • Qingdao Youth Island Win: Poisson 39% vs market fair-implied 23% (16pp gap) — the model sees Qingdao Youth Island as more likely than the market's pricing reflects. • Chengdu Better City Win: Poisson 35% vs market fair-implied 53% (18pp gap) — the model sees Chengdu Better City as less likely than the market's pricing reflects. • Goals market: Over 2.5 1.69 (impl 59%) / Under 2.5 2.09 (impl 48%) | Poisson Over 2.5 probability 50% • BTTS market: BTTS Yes 1.65 (impl 61%) / No 2.11 (impl 47%) | Poisson BTTS probability 54%

🧮 Prediction Model

1.38

Qingdao Youth Island xG

Expected Goals

1.29

Chengdu Better City xG

39%
26%
35%
Qingdao Youth Island Draw Chengdu Better City

54%

BTTS

75%

Over 1.5

50%

Over 2.5

28%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 11:00 on Friday 17 July 2026 at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center.

What was the final score in Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City?

Qingdao Youth Island 1 - 1 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center.

What competition is Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 19 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Qingdao Youth Island a 39% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 35% chance, and a 26% chance of a draw — making Qingdao Youth Island the favourite.

Will both teams score in Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 54% probability that both Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 50%.

What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City?

Record (5 meetings): Qingdao Youth Island 0W | Draws 3 | Chengdu Better City 2W.

What form are Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City in?

Qingdao Youth Island (all comps): 4W-5D-1L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.50 | L5 W-D-W-W-L. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.00 | L5 L-W-W-D-D.

What do the betting odds say about Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City?

1X2 market: Qingdao Youth Island 4.14 (impl 23%) | Draw 3.79 (impl 25%) | Chengdu Better City 1.76 (impl 53%).

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Working from Qingdao Youth Island's attack rating (0.92) and Chengdu Better City's defence rating (0.85), the model arrives at 1.38 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Chengdu Better City's attack versus Qingdao Youth Island's defence, projects 1.29 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 48/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 13.9%. Close behind: 0-0 (8.5%), 2-1 (8.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Qingdao Youth Island Win

39%

Qingdao Youth Island

2.57

26%

Draw

3.81

35%

Chengdu Better City

2.86

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

12.3%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

9.5%

Home win

0 – 1

9.0%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.38

Qingdao Youth Island xG

Total xG

2.67

1.29

Chengdu Better City xG

39%
26%
35%
Qingdao Youth IslandDrawChengdu Better City

2.57

39%

Home win

3.81

26%

Draw

2.86

35%

Away win

Goals Markets

75%

Over 1.5

1.33

25%

Under 1.5

4.00

50%

Over 2.5

2.00

50%

Under 2.5

2.00

28%

Over 3.5

3.57

72%

Under 3.5

1.39

13%

Over 4.5

7.69

87%

Under 4.5

1.15

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

54%

BTTS Yes

1.84

46%

BTTS No

2.19

Clean Sheet

27%

Qingdao Youth Island

3.64

25%

Chengdu Better City

3.96

Win to Nil

11%

Qingdao Youth Island

9.37

9%

Chengdu Better City

11.33

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 6.9 9.0 5.8 2.5 0.8 0.2
1 9.5 12.3 8.0 3.4 1.1 0.3
2 6.6 8.5 5.5 2.4 0.8 0.2
3 3.0 3.9 2.5 1.1 0.3 0.1
4 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.4 0.1
5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.376
λ Away (xG) 1.292
Total xG 2.668
League avg home goals 1.760
League avg away goals 1.367
Qingdao Youth Island attack strength 0.923
Qingdao Youth Island defence strength 0.834
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.133
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.847
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 48 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.9%.

How many goals are Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 1.38 expected goals for Qingdao Youth Island and 1.29 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 2.67.

How confident is the prediction model for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 39%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Qingdao Youth Island's recent record stands at 15W 19D 14L from 48 games, a 1.33 PPG return, with W-D-W-W-L in the last five. The sample for Qingdao Youth Island is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chengdu Better City, meanwhile, have gone 30W 12D 6L across 48 games — 2.12 PPG, with L-W-W-D-D in their last five. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours Chengdu Better City by 0.79 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Qingdao Youth Island heading into this one.

Venue Form

At home specifically, Qingdao Youth Island have managed 9W 11D 4L from 24 games — 1.58 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Chengdu Better City's away record stands at 13W 8D 3L across 24 trips, a 1.96 PPG haul.

Goals in Recent Form

Qingdao Youth Island are averaging 1.27 goals scored and 1.48 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 2.04 scored and 0.94 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Qingdao Youth Island have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games; Chengdu Better City in 60%.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City in 35% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 48 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Qingdao Youth Island

Qingdao Youth Island

Blended
W D W W L
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
L W W D D
48 Played 48
15/19/14 W / D / L 30/12/6
1.33 Points Per Game 2.12
1.27 Avg Goals Scored 2.04
1.48 Avg Goals Conceded 0.94
2.75 Avg Goals / Game 2.98
11 Clean Sheets 17
30 BTTS 29
24 Over 2.5 Games 27
Qingdao Youth Island

Qingdao Youth Island

L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–3 HT 0–2
11 Jul
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 0–0
04 Jul
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Jun
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–2 HT 1–1
30 May
W
A Yunnan Yukun
3–2 HT 1–1
24 May
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
19 May
W
A Dalian Zhixing
3–2 HT 1–0
15 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 1–0
10 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
05 May
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
01 May
D
A Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Apr
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Apr
D
H Shenyang Urban
1–1 HT 1–0
11 Apr
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–5 HT 0–2
03 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Mar
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–4 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–2
08 Mar
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
22 Nov
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–0
26 Oct
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Oct
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Oct
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Sep
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
20 Sep
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–3 HT 0–1
24 Aug
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–3 HT 0–1
16 Aug
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
W
H Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 2–1
02 Aug
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
17 Jun
D
H Yunnan Yukun
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–4 HT 0–3
10 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
06 May
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–0
02 May
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–5 HT 0–1
15 Apr
D
H Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–2
06 Apr
W
A Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–1
01 Apr
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–3 HT 3–1
28 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 1–0
03 Mar
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–2 HT 1–2
23 Feb
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
H Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–1 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–0
05 Jul
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–2 HT 1–0
27 Jun
W
H Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
30 May
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–2 HT 0–0
23 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
19 May
W
A Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
15 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
09 May
W
A Shenyang Urban
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
01 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
4–0 HT 3–0
25 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
2–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Apr
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 0–0
12 Apr
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
5–1 HT 2–0
03 Apr
D
A Chongqing Tongliang Long
3–3 HT 2–0
21 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–1 HT 3–1
06 Mar
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Qingdao Youth Island have gone 15W 19D 14L in their last 48 games (1.33 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 30W 12D 6L in their last 48 (2.12 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Qingdao Youth Island at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Chengdu Better City's away record (1.96 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Qingdao Youth Island at home: 1.58 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.96 PPG.

Have Qingdao Youth Island or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Qingdao Youth Island have kept a clean sheet in 23% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 35%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to May 2024. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 17 July 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Streaks & Records

The biggest gap between the sides came on 26 May 2024, when Chengdu Better City won 7-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Qingdao Youth Island's record when hosting Chengdu Better City specifically: 0W 3D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

Qingdao Youth Island

0

Qingdao Youth Island

4

Draws

Chengdu Better City

2

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Qingdao Youth Island
1–1
17 Jul 26
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
5–1
03 Apr 26
Qingdao Youth Island
Qingdao Youth Island
2–2
26 Oct 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–1
17 May 25
Qingdao Youth Island
Qingdao Youth Island
1–1
27 Oct 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
7–0
26 May 24
Qingdao Youth Island

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City?

From 6 meetings on record, Qingdao Youth Island have won 0, Chengdu Better City have won 2, and 4 have been drawn.

When did Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 17 July 2026, when Qingdao Youth Island 1-1 Chengdu Better City.

Who has won more matches between Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Qingdao Youth Island are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 17% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

Full-Time Trends

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — Qingdao Youth Island at 62%, Chengdu Better City at 71%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 46% (Qingdao Youth Island) and 62% (Chengdu Better City).

On the defensive side: Qingdao Youth Island keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Qingdao Youth Island home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Qingdao Youth Island Qingdao Youth Island Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 35/48
(72.9%)
16/24
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/48
(35.4%)
7/24
(29.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/13
(61.5%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/13
(46.2%)
4/8
(50%)
Winning at HT 12/48
(25%)
9/24
(37.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/48
(10.4%)
4/24
(16.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/48
(10.4%)
1/24
(4.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/48
(62.5%)
15/24
(62.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 24/48
(50%)
11/24
(45.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/48
(35.4%)
8/24
(33.3%)
Clean Sheet 11/48
(22.9%)
8/24
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 12/48
(25%)
4/24
(16.7%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/48
(75%)
16/24
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/48
(41.7%)
11/24
(45.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/12
(91.7%)
8/8
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/12
(50%)
6/8
(75%)
Winning at HT 23/48
(47.9%)
8/24
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/48
(10.4%)
2/24
(8.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/48
(8.3%)
3/24
(12.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 29/48
(60.4%)
17/24
(70.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 27/48
(56.2%)
15/24
(62.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/48
(33.3%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Clean Sheet 17/48
(35.4%)
6/24
(25%)
Failed to Score 3/48
(6.2%)
1/24
(4.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Qingdao Youth Island play Chengdu Better City?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 62% of Qingdao Youth Island's games and 71% of Chengdu Better City's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 46% of Qingdao Youth Island's recent games and 62% of Chengdu Better City's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Qingdao Youth Island have had a goal before half-time in 67% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 67% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center, Regular Season - 19, as Qingdao Youth Island and Chengdu Better City drew 1-1 in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Qingdao Youth Island 1.38 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.29 xG, a combined 2.67. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.92 / defence 0.83 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.13 / defence 0.85, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Qingdao Youth Island 39% | Draw 26% | Chengdu Better City 35%, with Qingdao Youth Island to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 50%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 75% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Qingdao Youth Island 50%, Chengdu Better City 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 61%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Qingdao Youth Island's trading profile (48 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (48 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 2.12 PPG against 1.33. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.04 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 50% Over 2.5 probability, 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 54% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 53% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.