Sign in Register

Qingdao Jonoon 2-2 Shandong Luneng – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 25

Kick-off

Sat 20 Sep 2025

13:00

Venue

Qingdao Youth Football Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Qingdao Jonoon at 41%, yet in-form Shandong Luneng provide a compelling counter-argument — this Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 25 sees Shandong Luneng travel to Qingdao Youth Football Stadium to take on Qingdao Jonoon. The game is scheduled for Saturday 20 September 2025, 13:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Qingdao Jonoon stand at 2W 2D 6L from 10 Super League matches — 0.80 PPG. Last five: L W D L D. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their games — a low BTTS rate that suggests clean sheets are a regular occurrence. This season is still relatively young for Qingdao Jonoon, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Qingdao Jonoon have posted 3W 4D 3L at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium — 1.30 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 1.30 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.80 — Qingdao Jonoon are significantly better at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Shandong Luneng — All Games: 6W 2D 2L from 10 Super League fixtures this season — 2.00 PPG. Last five: W W W W D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.60 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Shandong Luneng, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Super League this season, Shandong Luneng have posted 2W 3D 5L from 10 away outings — 0.90 PPG. They are averaging 1.80 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.90 is notably below their overall 2.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Shandong Luneng are 1.20 PPG ahead (2.00 vs 0.80), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

Head to Head

Despite the anticipated home advantage, Shandong Luneng have the better historical record — 3 wins from 5 previous contests against 0 for Qingdao Jonoon.

The 5 previous meetings have averaged 2.4 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 1 May 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

It is worth noting that Shandong Luneng have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 3 wins from 5 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

In-Play Data

Qingdao Jonoon trading profile (53 games, 27 at home): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 59% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 37% of games (home games); they fail to score in 49% of games.

Shandong Luneng trading profile (53 games, 27 at away): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 45%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Qingdao Jonoon 40% versus Shandong Luneng 57%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Qingdao Jonoon 38% | Shandong Luneng 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Qingdao Jonoon 1.73 xG and Shandong Luneng 1.57 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.878 / defence 0.930 | Shandong Luneng attack 1.263 / defence 1.075. League average goals — home 1.834 / away 1.339. Shandong Luneng have an above-average attack strength of 1.263 — the away xG of 1.57 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 53 Qingdao Jonoon games / 54 Shandong Luneng games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Qingdao Jonoon 41% | Draw 25% | Shandong Luneng 34%. Fair-value odds: Qingdao Jonoon 2.44 | Draw 4.00 | Shandong Luneng 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 64% | BTTS probability 66% | Total xG 3.30. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 64% — the 3.30 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 66% reflects that both xG figures (1.73 / 1.57) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Qingdao Jonoon as the most likely outcome at 41% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Shandong Luneng (2.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 25% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Qingdao Jonoon offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.30 combined xG gives a 64% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 66% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Qingdao Jonoon 50% | Shandong Luneng 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Shandong Luneng have been the dominant side historically, winning 3 of 5 meetings.
H2H H2H history favours Shandong Luneng but Poisson model leans Qingdao Jonoon — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Form Shandong Luneng lead on PPG: 2.00 vs 0.80 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Qingdao Jonoon Poisson xG (1.73) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.40) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Form (PPG) favours Shandong Luneng but Poisson leans Qingdao Jonoon (41%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 64% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 66% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 25 | Venue: Qingdao Youth Football Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 20 Sep 2025, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Qingdao Jonoon 41% | Draw 25% | Shandong Luneng 34% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 64% | BTTS 66% | xG Qingdao Jonoon 1.73 / Shandong Luneng 1.57 • Poisson strength factors: Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.878 / def 0.930 | Shandong Luneng attack 1.263 / def 1.075 | league avg home 1.834 / away 1.339 • Poisson stance: Qingdao Jonoon (41%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.73

Qingdao Jonoon xG

Expected Goals

1.57

Shandong Luneng xG

41%
25%
34%
Qingdao Jonoon Draw Shandong Luneng

66%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

64%

Over 2.5

42%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng kick off?

Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng kicked off at 13:00 on Saturday 20 September 2025 at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium.

What was the final score in Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng?

Qingdao Jonoon 2 - 2 Shandong Luneng.

Where is Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng being played?

The match is being played at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium.

What competition is Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng part of?

Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng is a Regular Season - 25 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng?

Our statistical model gives Qingdao Jonoon a 41% chance of winning, Shandong Luneng a 34% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Qingdao Jonoon the favourite.

Will both teams score in Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng?

Our model estimates a 66% probability that both Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng will score (BTTS).

Will Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 64%.

What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng?

Record (5 meetings): Qingdao Jonoon 0W | Draws 2 | Shandong Luneng 3W.

What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng in?

Qingdao Jonoon (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-W-D-L-D. Shandong Luneng (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.60 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-W-W-W-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Qingdao Jonoon's attacking strength (0.88x league average) is weighed against Shandong Luneng's defensive record (1.07x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.73. The same calculation in reverse, Shandong Luneng's attack versus Qingdao Jonoon's defence, projects 1.57 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 53/54 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 11.3%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.7%), 1-2 (7.9%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Qingdao Jonoon Win

41%

Qingdao Jonoon

2.46

25%

Draw

3.96

34%

Shandong Luneng

2.94

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.0%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

8.7%

Home win

1 – 2

7.9%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.73

Qingdao Jonoon xG

Total xG

3.30

1.57

Shandong Luneng xG

41%
25%
34%
Qingdao JonoonDrawShandong Luneng

2.46

41%

Home win

3.96

25%

Draw

2.94

34%

Away win

Goals Markets

84%

Over 1.5

1.19

16%

Under 1.5

6.25

64%

Over 2.5

1.56

36%

Under 2.5

2.78

42%

Over 3.5

2.38

58%

Under 3.5

1.72

24%

Over 4.5

4.17

76%

Under 4.5

1.32

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

66%

BTTS Yes

1.51

34%

BTTS No

2.97

Clean Sheet

21%

Qingdao Jonoon

4.82

18%

Shandong Luneng

5.65

Win to Nil

8%

Qingdao Jonoon

11.85

6%

Shandong Luneng

16.58

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.7 5.8 4.5 2.4 0.9 0.3
1 6.4 10.0 7.9 4.1 1.6 0.5
2 5.5 8.7 6.8 3.6 1.4 0.4
3 3.2 5.0 3.9 2.1 0.8 0.3
4 1.4 2.2 1.7 0.9 0.4 0.1
5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.731
λ Away (xG) 1.573
Total xG 3.304
League avg home goals 1.834
League avg away goals 1.339
Qingdao Jonoon attack strength 0.878
Qingdao Jonoon defence strength 0.930
Shandong Luneng attack strength 1.263
Shandong Luneng defence strength 1.075
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 53 / 54

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.3%.

How many goals are Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng expected to score?

The model projects 1.73 expected goals for Qingdao Jonoon and 1.57 for Shandong Luneng, a combined total of 3.30.

How confident is the prediction model for Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 41%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 53 outings, Qingdao Jonoon have picked up 0.85 PPG on a 11W 12D 30L record — L-W-D-L-D across the most recent five. The sample for Qingdao Jonoon is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Shandong Luneng's form line: 24W 14D 15L from 53 games, 1.62 PPG, last five W-W-W-W-D. The sample for Shandong Luneng is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Shandong Luneng are the form team by 0.77 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Qingdao Jonoon.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Qingdao Jonoon have posted 1.30 PPG from 27 outings (9W 8D 10L). That's noticeably better than their 0.85 PPG overall — Qingdao Jonoon are a different proposition at home than their general record suggests.

On the road, Shandong Luneng have gone 9W 8D 10L from 27 away games — 1.30 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

Qingdao Jonoon are averaging 0.92 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game recently; Shandong Luneng are on 1.87 scored and 1.43 conceded.

Last 53 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Qingdao Jonoon

Qingdao Jonoon

Blended
L W D L D
Shandong Luneng

Shandong Luneng

Blended
W W W W D
53 Played 53
11/12/30 W / D / L 24/14/15
0.85 Points Per Game 1.62
0.92 Avg Goals Scored 1.87
1.70 Avg Goals Conceded 1.43
2.62 Avg Goals / Game 3.30
8 Clean Sheets 13
21 BTTS 30
20 Over 2.5 Games 34
Qingdao Jonoon

Qingdao Jonoon

D
H Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
23 Aug
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
H Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 2–1
09 Aug
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–0 HT 1–0
27 Jul
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–4 HT 0–2
19 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Jun
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–3 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–2 HT 0–2
13 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
17 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
09 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
3–0 HT 0–0
05 May
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–0
01 May
D
H Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Apr
L
A Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 1–0
20 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–3 HT 2–2
16 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–1 HT 0–0
06 Apr
D
H Dalian Zhixing
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Apr
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 2–1
23 Feb
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Nov
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–6 HT 0–2
19 Oct
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
22 Sep
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
H Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–0
10 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–4 HT 1–2
03 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
4–2 HT 2–1
28 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–0
21 Jul
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
3–1 HT 3–1
07 Jul
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–5 HT 0–2
30 Jun
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–5 HT 1–2
26 Jun
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–1 HT 2–0
26 May
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
21 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
15 May
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
05 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–2
01 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 3–0
26 Apr
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
D
A Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Mar
L
H Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
02 Mar
Shandong Luneng

Shandong Luneng

D
A Shanghai Shenhua
3–3 HT 2–2
12 Sep
W
H Beijing Guoan
6–0 HT 4–0
31 Aug
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
3–2 HT 1–0
24 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 2–0
16 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 0–0
27 Jul
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–2 HT 0–1
19 Jul
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 1–0
25 Jun
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Jun
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1 HT 0–0
17 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
4–2 HT 1–1
10 May
L
A Yunnan Yukun
2–3 HT 2–0
05 May
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–0
01 May
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–6 HT 1–2
19 Apr
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
5–1 HT 1–0
15 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
4–0 HT 4–0
11 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
06 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–3 HT 0–2
02 Apr
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–3 HT 1–3
29 Mar
W
H Dalian Zhixing
4–1 HT 1–1
28 Feb
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Feb
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 1–2
27 Oct
W
H Tianjin Teda
4–1 HT 2–0
18 Oct
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
4–1 HT 0–0
28 Sep
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
0–1 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
H Chengdu Better City
3–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–3 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Aug
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Jul
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–0 HT 1–0
21 Jul
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–6 HT 0–3
06 Jul
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–2
30 Jun
D
A Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 3–0
25 May
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 0–1
21 May
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–2 HT 2–1
16 May
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–1 HT 1–0
11 May
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–0 HT 0–0
04 May
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
3–1 HT 1–1
30 Apr
W
A Chengdu Better City
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 3–0
20 Apr
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–4 HT 3–2
14 Apr
D
H Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 0–0
09 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–3 HT 0–2
31 Mar
D
H Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng in coming into this match?

Qingdao Jonoon have gone 11W 12D 30L in their last 53 games (0.85 PPG), while Shandong Luneng have gone 24W 14D 15L in their last 53 (1.62 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Qingdao Jonoon at home or Shandong Luneng away?

Qingdao Jonoon's home record (1.30 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Qingdao Jonoon at home: 1.30 PPG; Shandong Luneng away: 1.30 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to May 2023. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 14 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

The biggest gap between the sides came on 26 Apr 2026, when Qingdao Jonoon won 4-1 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Qingdao Jonoon's record when hosting Shandong Luneng specifically: 1W 1D 2L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Qingdao Jonoon

1

Qingdao Jonoon

3

Draws

Shandong Luneng

4

Shandong Luneng

Recent Meetings

Shandong Luneng
3–1
14 Aug 26
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
4–1
26 Apr 26
Shandong Luneng
Qingdao Jonoon
2–2
20 Sep 25
Shandong Luneng
Shandong Luneng
1–1
01 May 25
Qingdao Jonoon
Shandong Luneng
1–1
13 Jul 24
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
0–1
05 Apr 24
Shandong Luneng
Shandong Luneng
4–2
15 Sep 23
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
0–1
28 May 23
Shandong Luneng

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng?

From 8 meetings on record, Qingdao Jonoon have won 1, Shandong Luneng have won 4, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng last play each other?

They last met on 14 August 2026, when Shandong Luneng 3-1 Qingdao Jonoon.

Who has won more matches between Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng?

Shandong Luneng have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Qingdao Jonoon are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 63% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 41% of the time.

Shandong Luneng are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 82% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 41% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 18% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 11% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Qingdao Jonoon 48%, Shandong Luneng 63% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 37% (Qingdao Jonoon) and 59% (Shandong Luneng).

On the defensive side: Qingdao Jonoon have failed to score in 33% of games; Shandong Luneng in 26%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Qingdao Jonoon home games / Shandong Luneng away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Qingdao Jonoon Qingdao Jonoon Blended
Metric All
(53 games)
Venue
(27 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/53
(67.9%)
17/27
(63%)
2+ Goals Before HT 16/53
(30.2%)
7/27
(25.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 15/17
(88.2%)
10/10
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/17
(58.8%)
7/10
(70%)
Winning at HT 14/53
(26.4%)
11/27
(40.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/53
(7.5%)
3/27
(11.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/53
(3.8%)
2/27
(7.4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 21/53
(39.6%)
13/27
(48.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 20/53
(37.7%)
10/27
(37%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/53
(32.1%)
8/27
(29.6%)
Clean Sheet 8/53
(15.1%)
5/27
(18.5%)
Failed to Score 26/53
(49.1%)
9/27
(33.3%)
Shandong Luneng Shandong Luneng Blended
Metric All
(53 games)
Venue
(27 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 40/53
(75.5%)
22/27
(81.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 25/53
(47.2%)
12/27
(44.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/13
(61.5%)
3/5
(60%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/13
(38.5%)
2/5
(40%)
Winning at HT 21/53
(39.6%)
11/27
(40.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/53
(9.4%)
5/27
(18.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/53
(5.7%)
3/27
(11.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/53
(56.6%)
17/27
(63%)
Over 2.5 Goals 34/53
(64.2%)
16/27
(59.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 24/53
(45.3%)
13/27
(48.1%)
Clean Sheet 13/53
(24.5%)
5/27
(18.5%)
Failed to Score 15/53
(28.3%)
7/27
(25.9%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Qingdao Jonoon play Shandong Luneng?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 48% of Qingdao Jonoon's games and 63% of Shandong Luneng's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Qingdao Jonoon vs Shandong Luneng usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 37% of Qingdao Jonoon's recent games and 59% of Shandong Luneng's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng tend to score early?

Qingdao Jonoon have had a goal before half-time in 63% of their recent matches, Shandong Luneng in 82% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium, Regular Season - 25, as Qingdao Jonoon and Shandong Luneng drew 2-2 in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Qingdao Jonoon 1.73 xG and Shandong Luneng 1.57 xG, a combined 3.30. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.88 / defence 0.93 against Shandong Luneng attack 1.26 / defence 1.07, drawn from 53/54 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Qingdao Jonoon 41% | Draw 25% | Shandong Luneng 34%, with Qingdao Jonoon to win its most likely call at 41%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 64%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 42% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 66% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Qingdao Jonoon 38%, Shandong Luneng 64%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Qingdao Jonoon's trading profile (53 games, 27 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did.

Shandong Luneng's trading profile (53 games, 27 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Shandong Luneng arrived the stronger side — 1.62 PPG against 0.85. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 64% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 66% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 51% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.