🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Chengdu Better City edge out Qingdao Jonoon 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Qingdao Jonoon 0-1 at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium, Regular Season - 6, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Qingdao Jonoon 0.89 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.73 xG, a combined 2.62. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Qingdao Jonoon fell 0.9 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.77 / defence 1.01 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.18 / defence 0.71, drawn from 35/35 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Qingdao Jonoon 17% | Draw 28% | Chengdu Better City 55%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 55%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 49%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 76% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Qingdao Jonoon 43%, Chengdu Better City 60%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 47%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Qingdao Jonoon's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 47% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.87 PPG against 0.95. That form edge translated into the three points. Qingdao Jonoon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.47 scoring average — below par going forward. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.23 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights