🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Chengdu Better City (55%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Qingdao Jonoon face Chengdu Better City.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Super League clash, Regular Season - 6 as Qingdao Jonoon welcome Chengdu Better City to Qingdao Youth Football Stadium. Kick-off is set for Saturday 12 April 2025 at 12:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Super League games this season, Qingdao Jonoon have gone 3W 1D 6L from 10 outings — a 1.00 PPG return. Last five: L L L L W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

At home at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium, Qingdao Jonoon have gone 5W 2D 3L this season (10 games, 1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.70 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.00 — Qingdao Jonoon are significantly better at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Chengdu Better City stand at 5W 2D 3L from 10 Super League matches — 1.70 PPG. Last five: L W W D L. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.20. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Chengdu Better City's away record: 4W 3D 3L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (1.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

Form points away from home here. Chengdu Better City's 1.70 PPG return is 0.70 points per game ahead of Qingdao Jonoon's 1.00 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for Qingdao Jonoon, 3 for Chengdu Better City and 0 shared spoils from 4 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 4 meetings have averaged 4.5 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 26 Jun 2024, ended 1–5 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.5 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

Qingdao Jonoon in-play and half-time data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 47% of games.

Chengdu Better City in-play and half-time data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Qingdao Jonoon 40% versus Chengdu Better City 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Qingdao Jonoon 43% | Chengdu Better City 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Qingdao Jonoon 0.89 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.73 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.771 / defence 1.006 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.178 / defence 0.706. League average goals — home 1.638 / away 1.456. Qingdao Jonoon's attack strength of 0.771 is below the league average — the 0.89 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Chengdu Better City's defence strength of 0.706 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 35 Qingdao Jonoon games / 35 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Qingdao Jonoon 17% | Draw 28% | Chengdu Better City 55%. Fair-value odds: Qingdao Jonoon 5.88 | Draw 3.57 | Chengdu Better City 1.82. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (55%) — a 38pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.62. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.62 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 55% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 28% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 2.62 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 49% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence — though H2H averaging only 4.5 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 51% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Qingdao Jonoon 60% | Chengdu Better City 50% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights