Fixture360 logo BETA
Sign in Register
Super League · Regular Season - 4
0:1
FT HT 0 – 0

Chongqing Tongliang Long

⚽ Du Yuezheng 72'

Kick-off

Sun 5 Apr 2026

07:30

Venue

Huzhou Olympic Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
📰

Red card controversy as Chongqing Tongliang Long claim a 0-1 win.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chongqing Tongliang Long beat Hangzhou Greentown 0-1 at Huzhou Olympic Sports Centre, Regular Season - 4, in the Super League. It was 0-0 at the break, with 1 further goal after it. A red card featured along the way. Scorers: Du Yuezheng (72'). With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Hangzhou Greentown 1.67 xG and Chongqing Tongliang Long 0.78 xG, a combined 2.45. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Hangzhou Greentown fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Hangzhou Greentown attack 0.95 / defence 0.95 against Chongqing Tongliang Long attack 0.74 / defence 0.94, drawn from 33/3 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Hangzhou Greentown 59% | Draw 24% | Chongqing Tongliang Long 17%, with Hangzhou Greentown to win its most likely call at 59%. Instead the game produced a Chongqing Tongliang Long win, an outcome the model had rated at just 17% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 44%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 70% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 44% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour.

In-Play Signals

Hangzhou Greentown controlled the ball (70%). That matched the side the model favoured, and they were undone despite it. Hangzhou Greentown shot more often (10 to 8, 3 on target). The game stayed goalless into the break before it came to life. 1 of the 1 goal arrived after the restart.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Possession Hangzhou Greentown dominated possession at 70% — yet the final score may tell a different story.
Set Pieces The match produced 10 corners combined — set-piece delivery was a key feature of this game.
Upset Prediction model was wrong — Chongqing Tongliang Long overturned the pre-game favourite Hangzhou Greentown.
Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 44% Over 2.5 probability, 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 44% projected, both teams did not both score.

⚡ Key Moments

⚽️
72'
Goal

Du Yuezheng

Du Yuezheng found the back of the net to make it 0-1. Breaking the deadlock at this stage was a pivotal moment, handing Chongqing Tongliang Long the initiative.

🟥
89'
Red Card

Alexandru Mitriță

Alexandru Mitriță from Hangzhou Greentown was dismissed in the 89', leaving their side to play out the remainder of the game with ten men. This red card came at a critical juncture and would prove a significant factor in how the match concluded.

📺
89'
VAR Decision

Card upgrade

The Video Assistant Referee intervened at 89' — Card upgrade. The VAR check confirmed the on-field decision, allowing play to continue.

📊 Statistics

Hangzhou Greentown Chongqing Tongliang Long
70% Ball Possession 30%
10 Total Shots 8
2 Shots on Goal 3
6 Shots off Goal 3
2 Blocked Shots 2
9 Corner Kicks 1
0 Offsides 2
9 Fouls 14
1 Yellow Cards 2
1 Red Cards 0
2 Goalkeeper Saves 2
559 Total passes 239
478 Passes accurate 169
86% Passes % 71%

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from official fixture data. All statistics, events and player data are sourced from the match record. Analysis is for informational purposes only.