Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 4-0 Hangzhou Greentown – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 8

Kick-off

Sat 25 Apr 2026

11:00

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 70% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Hangzhou Greentown make the trip to Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park to face Chengdu Better City in Super League, Regular Season - 8. The match kicks off on Saturday 25 April 2026 at 11:00 UTC.

Current Form

Chengdu Better City's overall Super League record this term: 4W 5D 1L from 10 games (1.70 PPG). Last five: D W D L D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

Chengdu Better City's home record at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park: 7W 2D 1L from 10 Super League appearances (2.30 PPG). They are averaging 2.10 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.30 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.70 — Chengdu Better City are significantly better at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park than their overall form suggests.

Hangzhou Greentown have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 2W 7D 1L. Last five: D D D L D. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.70. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Hangzhou Greentown's form when playing away from home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.20 PPG). They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.70 PPG for Chengdu Better City against 1.30 for Hangzhou Greentown. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Chengdu Better City have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Hangzhou Greentown in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Across 8 previous meetings, Chengdu Better City are the stronger side on paper — 4 victories to 1, with 3 draws in between.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.1 per game across 8 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 26 Sep 2025, ended 3–3 with a draw.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Chengdu Better City and goals. The home side's 4 wins from 8 meetings, combined with an average of 3.1 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Trading

Chengdu Better City half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 93% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; they lead at the break 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

Hangzhou Greentown half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 58%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Chengdu Better City 58% and Hangzhou Greentown 67% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Chengdu Better City 60% | Hangzhou Greentown 77%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 2.59 xG and Hangzhou Greentown 1.06 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.376 / defence 0.899 | Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.063 / defence 1.172. League average goals — home 1.607 / away 1.112. Chengdu Better City carry an above-average attack strength of 1.376 — their λ of 2.59 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Data: 37 Chengdu Better City games / 37 Hangzhou Greentown games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 70% | Draw 16% | Hangzhou Greentown 13%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.43 | Draw 6.25 | Hangzhou Greentown 7.69. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (70%) — a 57pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 71% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.66. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 71% — a total xG of 3.66 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (2.59 / 1.06) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Chengdu Better City are the pick at 70% — clear model lean.

The Poisson model projects 3.66 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 71% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 3.3 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.1 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 61% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chengdu Better City 60% | Hangzhou Greentown 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Chengdu Better City hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 8 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 50% vs Poisson 70%.
Goals H2H (3.12 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.66) both back Over 2.5 goals (71% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 75% and Poisson BTTS 61% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (2.59) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (2.10) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Hangzhou Greentown Poisson xG (1.06) is below their form scoring rate (1.90) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Chengdu Better City 6/10, Hangzhou Greentown 6/10) and Poisson model (61%).
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Chengdu Better City at 70% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 71% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 61% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 8 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park • Kick-off: Saturday 25 Apr 2026, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 70% | Draw 16% | Hangzhou Greentown 13% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 71% | BTTS 61% | xG Chengdu Better City 2.59 / Hangzhou Greentown 1.06 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.376 / def 0.899 | Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.063 / def 1.172 | league avg home 1.607 / away 1.112 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (70%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.59

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

1.06

Hangzhou Greentown xG

70%
16%
Chengdu Better City Draw Hangzhou Greentown

61%

BTTS

88%

Over 1.5

71%

Over 2.5

50%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown kicked off at 11:00 on Saturday 25 April 2026 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown?

Chengdu Better City 4 - 0 Hangzhou Greentown.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown part of?

Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown is a Regular Season - 8 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 70% chance of winning, Hangzhou Greentown a 13% chance, and a 16% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown?

Our model estimates a 61% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 71%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown?

Record (8 meetings): Chengdu Better City 4W | Draws 3 | Hangzhou Greentown 1W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 4W-5D-1L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 1.20 | L5 D-W-D-L-D. Hangzhou Greentown (all comps): 2W-7D-1L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 1.70 | L5 D-D-D-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Chengdu Better City's attacking strength (1.38x league average) is weighed against Hangzhou Greentown's defensive record (1.17x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.59. Flip it around — Hangzhou Greentown's attack (1.06x) against Chengdu Better City's defence (0.90x) — and the away total comes out at 1.06.

These ratings are built from 37/37 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 2-1, at 9.2%. Close behind: 2-0 (8.7%), 1-1 (8.1%). Together the top three scorelines make up 26% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

70%

Chengdu Better City

1.42

16%

Draw

6.09

13%

Hangzhou Greentown

7.48

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.2%

Home win

Most likely

2 – 0

8.7%

Home win

3 – 1

8.0%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.59

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

3.66

1.06

Hangzhou Greentown xG

70%
16%
13%
Chengdu Better CityDrawHangzhou Greentown

1.42

70%

Home win

6.09

16%

Draw

7.48

13%

Away win

Goals Markets

88%

Over 1.5

1.14

12%

Under 1.5

8.33

71%

Over 2.5

1.41

29%

Under 2.5

3.45

50%

Over 3.5

2.00

50%

Under 3.5

2.00

30%

Over 4.5

3.33

70%

Under 4.5

1.43

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

61%

BTTS Yes

1.65

39%

BTTS No

2.53

Clean Sheet

35%

Chengdu Better City

2.90

7%

Hangzhou Greentown

13.36

Win to Nil

24%

Chengdu Better City

4.12

1%

Hangzhou Greentown

99.90

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 2.6 2.7 1.5 0.5 0.1
1 6.7 7.1 3.8 1.3 0.4 0.1
2 8.7 9.2 4.9 1.7 0.5 0.1
3 7.5 8.0 4.2 1.5 0.4 0.1
4 4.9 5.2 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.1
5 2.5 2.7 1.4 0.5 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.592
λ Away (xG) 1.063
Total xG 3.655
League avg home goals 1.607
League avg away goals 1.112
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.376
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.899
Hangzhou Greentown attack strength 1.063
Hangzhou Greentown defence strength 1.172
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 37 / 37

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.2%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown expected to score?

The model projects 2.59 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 1.06 for Hangzhou Greentown, a combined total of 3.66.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 70%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Chengdu Better City come into this having played 60 games, going 35W 14D 11L for 1.98 points per game. Their last five reads D-W-D-L-D.

On the other side, Hangzhou Greentown sit at 1.33 PPG from 60 outings (21W 17D 22L), a run that reads D-D-D-L-D across their last five.

Chengdu Better City carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.65 PPG clear of Hangzhou Greentown — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

How They Fare by Venue

Chengdu Better City's home form reads 21W 5D 4L across 30 games on their own ground, a 2.27 PPG return.

Away from home, Hangzhou Greentown have taken 0.90 points per game from 30 outings (7W 6D 17L). That's a step down from their 1.33 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Hangzhou Greentown's season.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Chengdu Better City are averaging 2.08 goals scored and 0.98 conceded per game recently; Hangzhou Greentown are on 1.92 scored and 1.85 conceded. Hangzhou Greentown's attacking output running into Chengdu Better City's solid defensive record is the key goals-market tension in this fixture.

On BTTS specifically: Hangzhou Greentown in 67%.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
D W D L D
Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

Current Season
D D D L D
60 Played 60
35/14/11 W / D / L 21/17/22
1.98 Points Per Game 1.33
2.08 Avg Goals Scored 1.92
0.98 Avg Goals Conceded 1.85
3.07 Avg Goals / Game 3.77
20 Clean Sheets 12
35 BTTS 40
36 Over 2.5 Games 46
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 3–1
18 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–1
21 Sep
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 3–0
09 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–0 HT 3–0
03 Aug
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–1 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Jun
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
7–0 HT 3–0
26 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 3–2
10 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
05 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

D
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–2 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–1
31 Oct
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 0–1
25 Oct
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 1–1
18 Oct
D
H Chengdu Better City
3–3 HT 2–3
26 Sep
D
A Changchun Yatai
3–3 HT 1–1
20 Sep
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Sep
D
A Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–1
24 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
H Beijing Guoan
3–4 HT 2–1
10 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–2 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H Yunnan Yukun
3–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Jun
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–2 HT 0–1
14 Jun
D
H Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 2–1
16 May
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–4 HT 1–1
10 May
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 0–1
05 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 3–1
01 May
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
H Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–3 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
4–0 HT 4–0
28 Mar
D
A Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Mar
D
H Dalian Zhixing
1–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
D
A Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Shandong Luneng
3–3 HT 2–1
27 Oct
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 1–0
18 Oct
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–3 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–2 HT 0–2
22 Sep
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–4 HT 2–2
13 Sep
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Tianjin Teda
2–3 HT 0–2
11 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
4–3 HT 2–1
03 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–1
28 Jul
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–2
21 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–5 HT 2–1
13 Jul
W
H Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
07 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
29 Jun
L
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–3 HT 1–0
25 Jun
W
H Changchun Yatai
3–1 HT 0–1
15 Jun
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–3
25 May
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 2–1
21 May
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
5–2 HT 3–1
17 May
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 0–0
12 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–4 HT 0–2
05 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–1
19 Apr
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Apr
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–3 HT 0–1
10 Apr
L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–2 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
03 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 35W 14D 11L in their last 60 games (1.98 PPG), while Hangzhou Greentown have gone 21W 17D 22L in their last 60 (1.33 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Hangzhou Greentown away?

Chengdu Better City's home record (2.27 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 2.27 PPG; Hangzhou Greentown away: 0.90 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or Hangzhou Greentown been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, Hangzhou Greentown in 20%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 10 times that we have on record, stretching back to October 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 3 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 15 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

There's a clear current trend here: Chengdu Better City have taken the last 2 head-to-head results.

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Chengdu Better City won 4-0 on 25 Apr 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Chengdu Better City have gone 3W 1D 1L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Hangzhou Greentown — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

6

Chengdu Better City

3

Draws

Hangzhou Greentown

1

Hangzhou Greentown

Recent Meetings

Hangzhou Greentown
2–3
15 Aug 26
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
4–0
25 Apr 26
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
3–3
26 Sep 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–1
05 May 25
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
1–3
28 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
3–0
10 Apr 24
Hangzhou Greentown
Chengdu Better City
1–2
29 Jul 23
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
0–2
30 Apr 23
Chengdu Better City
Hangzhou Greentown
1–1
15 Dec 22
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–1
24 Oct 22
Hangzhou Greentown

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown?

From 10 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 6, Hangzhou Greentown have won 1, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown last play each other?

They last met on 15 August 2026, when Hangzhou Greentown 2-3 Chengdu Better City.

Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 93% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 63% of the time.

Hangzhou Greentown are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 50%, Hangzhou Greentown 53% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 60% for Chengdu Better City and 70% for Hangzhou Greentown. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 37% and 47% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 47% of their matches; Hangzhou Greentown in 30%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Hangzhou Greentown away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
28/30
(93.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/60
(48.3%)
16/30
(53.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
1/2
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/9
(55.6%)
0/2
(0%)
Winning at HT 29/60
(48.3%)
19/30
(63.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
3/30
(10%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/60
(6.7%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/60
(58.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
18/30
(60%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Clean Sheet 20/60
(33.3%)
14/30
(46.7%)
Failed to Score 6/60
(10%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Hangzhou Greentown Hangzhou Greentown Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 51/60
(85%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 28/60
(46.7%)
11/30
(36.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/9
(66.7%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/9
(55.6%)
4/6
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 21/60
(35%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 9/60
(15%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/60
(13.3%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 40/60
(66.7%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 46/60
(76.7%)
21/30
(70%)
Over 3.5 Goals 35/60
(58.3%)
14/30
(46.7%)
Clean Sheet 12/60
(20%)
6/30
(20%)
Failed to Score 11/60
(18.3%)
9/30
(30%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Hangzhou Greentown?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 50% of Chengdu Better City's recent matches and 53% of Hangzhou Greentown's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Chengdu Better City vs Hangzhou Greentown usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 70% of Hangzhou Greentown's.

Do Chengdu Better City and Hangzhou Greentown tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 93% of their recent matches, Hangzhou Greentown in 80% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Chengdu Better City run riot with a 4-0 hammering of Hangzhou Greentown.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Hangzhou Greentown 4-0 at Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park, Regular Season - 8, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 2.59 xG and Hangzhou Greentown 1.06 xG, a combined 3.66. The scoreboard read 4-0 for 4 actual goals. Chengdu Better City beat their projection by 1.4 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Hangzhou Greentown landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.38 / defence 0.90 against Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.06 / defence 1.17, drawn from 37/37 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 70% | Draw 16% | Hangzhou Greentown 13%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 70%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 71%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 88% and landed. Over 3.5 was 50% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 61% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 68% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 60%, Hangzhou Greentown 77%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Hangzhou Greentown's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.98 PPG against 1.33. That form edge translated into the three points. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 2.23 average — above their attacking norm. Hangzhou Greentown (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.43 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 2.03 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 71% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 61% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 68% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.