RWDM 3-1 AS Eupen – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates RWDM at 42%, yet other data sources diverge — this RWDM vs AS Eupen fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Match Analysis
RWDM host AS Eupen at Edmond Machtensstadion in Jupiler Pro League, Relegation Round - 2. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 13 April 2024 at 15:00 UTC.
Form Guide
RWDM — All Games: 0W 3D 7L from 10 Jupiler Pro League outings this season, averaging 0.30 points per game. Last five: D L L L D. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 2.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.60 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
RWDM's form when playing at home: 1W 5D 4L across 10 games at Edmond Machtensstadion this term (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 0.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.30 — RWDM are significantly better at Edmond Machtensstadion than their overall form suggests.
Looking at all fixtures this season, AS Eupen stand at 2W 1D 7L from 10 Jupiler Pro League matches — 0.70 PPG. Last five: L L W L D. Their scoring rate of 0.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in only 10% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No.
AS Eupen away from home this season: 1W 1D 8L from 10 away games — 0.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.30 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.
The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: RWDM 0.30 PPG, AS Eupen 0.70 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.
Head to Head
There is little to separate the sides historically. From 2 previous meetings, RWDM have won 1, AS Eupen 1, with 0 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.
The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 24 Jan 2024, ended 0–1 with AS Eupen winning.
The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.
In-Play Profile
RWDM in-play tendencies (63 games, 31 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 61% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 55% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%.
AS Eupen in-play tendencies (63 games, 31 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 95% of the time; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 38%; they fail to score in 35% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RWDM 62% versus AS Eupen 51%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 65% | AS Eupen 52%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.31 xG and AS Eupen 1.06 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 0.674 / defence 1.471 | AS Eupen attack 0.613 / defence 1.240. League average goals — home 1.572 / away 1.176. RWDM's attack strength of 0.674 is below the league average — the 1.31 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. AS Eupen bring a strong defensive rating of 1.240 — this is suppressing RWDM's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 30 RWDM games / 64 AS Eupen games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: RWDM 42% | Draw 28% | AS Eupen 30%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 2.38 | Draw 3.57 | AS Eupen 3.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 42% | BTTS probability 48% | Total xG 2.37. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 58% — total xG of 2.37 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 48% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Summary & Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is RWDM at 42% — marginal model lean. With a 28% draw probability, Draw No Bet on RWDM offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
Poisson projects 2.37 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 42% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 48%. Form rates corroborate: RWDM 50% | AS Eupen 20% BTTS from recent games.
The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: RWDM vs AS Eupen | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Relegation Round - 2 | Venue: Edmond Machtensstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 13 Apr 2024, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 42% | Draw 28% | AS Eupen 30% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 42% | BTTS 48% | xG RWDM 1.31 / AS Eupen 1.06 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 0.674 / def 1.471 | AS Eupen attack 0.613 / def 1.240 | league avg home 1.572 / away 1.176 • Poisson stance: RWDM (42%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.31
RWDM xG
Expected Goals
1.06
AS Eupen xG
48%
BTTS
69%
Over 1.5
42%
Over 2.5
22%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does RWDM vs AS Eupen kick off?
RWDM vs AS Eupen kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 13 April 2024 at Edmond Machtensstadion.
What was the final score in RWDM vs AS Eupen?
RWDM 3 - 1 AS Eupen.
Where is RWDM vs AS Eupen being played?
The match is being played at Edmond Machtensstadion.
What competition is RWDM vs AS Eupen part of?
RWDM vs AS Eupen is a Relegation Round - 2 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win RWDM vs AS Eupen?
Our statistical model gives RWDM a 42% chance of winning, AS Eupen a 30% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.
Will both teams score in RWDM vs AS Eupen?
Our model estimates a 48% probability that both RWDM and AS Eupen will score (BTTS).
Will RWDM vs AS Eupen have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 42%.
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and AS Eupen?
Record (2 meetings): RWDM 1W | Draws 0 | AS Eupen 1W.
What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in?
RWDM (all comps): 0W-3D-7L in 10 | 0.30 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 2.60 | L5 D-L-L-L-D. AS Eupen (all comps): 2W-1D-7L in 10 | 0.70 PPG | GF 0.30 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-L-W-L-D.
🧮 Model Insight
How the Model Works This Match
RWDM's attacking strength (0.67x league average) is weighed against AS Eupen's defensive record (1.24x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.31. The same calculation in reverse, AS Eupen's attack versus RWDM's defence, projects 1.06 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from 30/64 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Most Likely Scorelines
The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 14.7%. Close behind: 0-0 (11.0%), 1-0 (10.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 36% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
RWDM Win
42%
2.36
28%
3.63
30%
3.33
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 1
13.0%
Draw
Most likely
1 β 0
12.2%
Home win
0 β 1
9.9%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.31
RWDM xG
Total xG
2.37
1.06
AS Eupen xG
2.36
42%
Home win
3.63
28%
Draw
3.33
30%
Away win
Goals Markets
69%
Over 1.5
1.45
31%
Under 1.5
3.23
42%
Over 2.5
2.38
58%
Under 2.5
1.72
22%
Over 3.5
4.55
78%
Under 3.5
1.28
9%
Over 4.5
11.11
91%
Under 4.5
1.10
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
48%
BTTS Yes
2.09
52%
BTTS No
1.92
Clean Sheet
35%
2.89
27%
3.72
Win to Nil
15%
6.81
8%
12.37
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 12.2 | 13.0 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | – |
| 4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs AS Eupen?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.7%.
How many goals are RWDM and AS Eupen expected to score?
The model projects 1.31 expected goals for RWDM and 1.06 for AS Eupen, a combined total of 2.37.
How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs AS Eupen?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 42%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Form at a Glance
RWDM's recent record stands at 26W 15D 22L from 63 games, a 1.48 PPG return, with D-L-L-L-D in the last five.
AS Eupen, meanwhile, have gone 13W 11D 39L across 63 games — 0.79 PPG, with L-L-W-L-D in their last five.
The points-per-game comparison favours RWDM by 0.69 — a real, if not enormous, edge over AS Eupen heading into this one.
Venue Form
At home specifically, RWDM have managed 15W 9D 7L from 31 games — 1.74 PPG in front of their own supporters.
AS Eupen's away record stands at 6W 4D 21L across 31 trips, a 0.71 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Goals in Recent Form
RWDM are averaging 1.52 goals scored and 1.52 conceded per game recently; AS Eupen are on 0.98 scored and 2.06 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: RWDM have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games.
Last 63 Results — Jupiler Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
RWDM
Current Season
AS Eupen
Current Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in coming into this match?
RWDM have gone 26W 15D 22L in their last 63 games (1.48 PPG), while AS Eupen have gone 13W 11D 39L in their last 63 (0.79 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or AS Eupen away?
RWDM's home record (1.74 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 1.74 PPG; AS Eupen away: 0.71 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
Fixture History
8 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to November 2023. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Jupiler Pro League, Challenger Pro League all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 1 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.
Streaks & Records
The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.
RWDM's record when hosting AS Eupen specifically: 2W 1D 1L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.
Last 8 Meetings
4
RWDM
2
Draws
2
AS Eupen
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and AS Eupen?
From 8 meetings on record, RWDM have won 4, AS Eupen have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.
When did RWDM and AS Eupen last play each other?
They last met on 1 March 2026, when RWDM 2-2 AS Eupen.
Who has won more matches between RWDM and AS Eupen?
RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
First-Half Patterns
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 36% of the time.
AS Eupen are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches.
Full-Time Trends
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 55%, AS Eupen 42% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 58% (RWDM) and 52% (AS Eupen).
On the defensive side: AS Eupen in 42%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = RWDM home games / AS Eupen away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when RWDM play AS Eupen?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 55% of RWDM's recent matches and 42% of AS Eupen's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is RWDM vs AS Eupen usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 58% of RWDM's recent games and 52% of AS Eupen's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do RWDM and AS Eupen tend to score early?
RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 77% of their recent matches, AS Eupen in 64% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
RWDM cruise to a comfortable 3-1 victory over AS Eupen.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
RWDM beat AS Eupen 3-1 at Edmond Machtensstadion, Relegation Round - 2, in the Jupiler Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.31 xG and AS Eupen 1.06 xG, a combined 2.37. The scoreboard read 3-1 for 4 actual goals. RWDM beat their projection by 1.7 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 0.67 / defence 1.47 against AS Eupen attack 0.61 / defence 1.24, drawn from 30/64 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it RWDM 42% | Draw 28% | AS Eupen 30%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 42%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 42%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 69% and landed. Over 3.5 was 22% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 65%, AS Eupen 52%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
RWDM's trading profile (63 games, 31 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.
AS Eupen's trading profile (63 games, 31 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.48 PPG against 0.79. Form held, and they took the win. RWDM (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.68 average — above their attacking norm.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.