Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 21

Kick-off

Sat 24 Jan 2026

19:00

Venue

Edmond Machtens Stadium

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
📋

Poisson rates Patro Eisden at 48% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this RWDM vs Patro Eisden encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Patro Eisden make the trip to Edmond Machtens Stadium to face RWDM in Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 21. The match kicks off on Saturday 24 January 2026 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

RWDM have collected 0.60 PPG across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season: 1W 3D 6L. Last five: D D W L L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 2.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

RWDM's home record at Edmond Machtens Stadium: 2W 3D 5L from 10 Challenger Pro League appearances (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Patro Eisden's overall Challenger Pro League record this term: 4W 3D 3L from 10 games (1.50 PPG). Last five: D W L D W. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 0.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.70 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Patro Eisden, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Patro Eisden away from home this season: 3W 3D 4L from 10 away games — 1.20 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Patro Eisden are 0.90 PPG clear of RWDM in recent Challenger Pro League fixtures (1.50 vs 0.60). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 0 wins for RWDM, 1 for Patro Eisden and 2 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 3 previous contests averaged 1.7 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 23 Nov 2025, ended 0–1 with Patro Eisden winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Data

RWDM goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (50 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games).

Patro Eisden goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (50 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 72% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RWDM 50% versus Patro Eisden 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 52% | Patro Eisden 48%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.07 xG and Patro Eisden 1.54 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 0.998 / defence 1.306 | Patro Eisden attack 0.873 / defence 0.795. League average goals — home 1.352 / away 1.352. Patro Eisden's defence strength of 0.795 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 48 RWDM games / 48 Patro Eisden games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RWDM 26% | Draw 25% | Patro Eisden 48%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 3.85 | Draw 4.00 | Patro Eisden 2.08. Patro Eisden hold a narrow Poisson edge at 48% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 52% | Total xG 2.62. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.62 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 52% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Patro Eisden as the most likely outcome at 48% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Patro Eisden if the outright odds are short.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.62 combined xG gives a 49% probability to Under 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by H2H averaging 1.7 goals per meeting — though form averaging only 2.9 goals per game points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 52%. Form rates are neutral: RWDM 60% | Patro Eisden 40%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–2D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 1.67 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.62 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 52% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Patro Eisden lead on PPG: 1.50 vs 0.60 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form RWDM Poisson xG (1.07) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.70) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Patro Eisden Poisson xG (1.54) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.10) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Patro Eisden — Patro Eisden at 48% win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: RWDM vs Patro Eisden | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 21 | Venue: Edmond Machtens Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 24 Jan 2026, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

⚔️ Head-to-Head History

• Record (3 meetings): RWDM 0W | Draws 2 | Patro Eisden 1W • Goals trend: 1.67 goals/game | Total H2H goals: RWDM 2 – 3 Patro Eisden • H2H markets: BTTS 67% | Over 2.5 0% | Win rates: RWDM 0% / Draw 67% / Patro Eisden 33% • Historical edge: no clear dominance — balanced H2H ledger • H2H result: balanced record (no historical lean) — Poisson model projects home 26% / draw 25% / away 48% • Goals contradiction: H2H averages only 1.67 goals/game but Poisson total xG is 2.62 (49% Over probability) — this season's attack strengths have improved relative to the historical pattern • BTTS corroboration: H2H BTTS rate 67%, Poisson BTTS probability 52% — BTTS Yes supported by both historical and model data

📈 Recent Form

• RWDM (all comps): 1W-3D-6L in 10 | 0.60 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 2.10 | L5 D-D-W-L-L • Patro Eisden (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 0.70 | L5 D-W-L-D-W • RWDM home split: 0.90 PPG from 10 | GF 1.70 / GA 1.90 | CS 1 • Patro Eisden away split: 1.20 PPG from 10 | GF 1.10 / GA 1.10 | CS 4 • Form edge: Patro Eisden lead by 0.90 PPG (1.50 vs 0.60) • xG vs form (RWDM): Poisson projects 1.07 xG vs form scoring rate of 1.70 — model is more cautious than form; the opposition's defensive strength is tempering the scoring expectation • xG vs form (Patro Eisden): Poisson projects 1.54 xG vs form scoring rate of 1.10 — model rates visitors higher than form alone implies, noting a favourable attack-vs-defence matchup • Goals margin: form ~2.2 goals/game, Poisson xG sum 2.62 (49% Over 2.5) — no strong lean either way • BTTS: mixed signals — form blend ~50% BTTS rate, Poisson probability 52% — no strong positional edge • Form vs Poisson alignment: form and model agree on Patro Eisden — Patro Eisden at 48% Poisson win probability

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 26% | Draw 25% | Patro Eisden 48% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 49% | BTTS 52% | xG RWDM 1.07 / Patro Eisden 1.54 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 0.998 / def 1.306 | Patro Eisden attack 0.873 / def 0.795 | league avg home 1.352 / away 1.352 • Poisson stance: Patro Eisden (48%) — moderate lean

🎲 Betting Market Intelligence

• Odds data is not currently available for this fixture

🧮 Prediction Model

1.07

RWDM xG

Expected Goals

1.54

Patro Eisden xG

26%
25%
48%
RWDM Draw Patro Eisden

52%

BTTS

74%

Over 1.5

49%

Over 2.5

27%

Over 3.5

πŸ”’

Full score probability matrix is a Premium feature

Upgrade to see the exact probability of every scoreline from 0-0 to 6-6, not just the headline 1X2 split.

Upgrade to Premium

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does RWDM vs Patro Eisden kick off?

RWDM vs Patro Eisden kicked off at 19:00 on Saturday 24 January 2026 at Edmond Machtens Stadium.

What was the final score in RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

RWDM 2 - 4 Patro Eisden.

Where is RWDM vs Patro Eisden being played?

The match is being played at Edmond Machtens Stadium.

What competition is RWDM vs Patro Eisden part of?

RWDM vs Patro Eisden is a Regular Season - 21 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Our statistical model gives RWDM a 26% chance of winning, Patro Eisden a 48% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Patro Eisden the favourite.

Will both teams score in RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Our model estimates a 52% probability that both RWDM and Patro Eisden will score (BTTS).

Will RWDM vs Patro Eisden have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 49%.

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Patro Eisden?

• Record (3 meetings): RWDM 0W | Draws 2 | Patro Eisden 1W • Goals trend: 1.67 goals/game | Total H2H goals: RWDM 2 – 3 Patro Eisden • H2H markets: BTTS 67% | Over 2.5 0% | Win rates: RWDM 0% / Draw 67% / Patro Eisden 33% • Historical edge: no clear dominance — balanced H2H ledger • H2H result: balanced record (no historical lean) — Poisson model projects home 26% / draw 25% / away 48% • Goals contradiction: H2H averages only 1.67 goals/game but Poisson total xG is 2.62 (49% Over probability) — this season's attack strengths have improved relative to the historical pattern • BTTS corroboration: H2H BTTS rate 67%, Poisson BTTS probability 52% — BTTS Yes supported by both historical and model data

What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in?

• RWDM (all comps): 1W-3D-6L in 10 | 0.60 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 2.10 | L5 D-D-W-L-L • Patro Eisden (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 0.70 | L5 D-W-L-D-W • RWDM home split: 0.90 PPG from 10 | GF 1.70 / GA 1.90 | CS 1 • Patro Eisden away split: 1.20 PPG from 10 | GF 1.10 / GA 1.10 | CS 4 • Form edge: Patro Eisden lead by 0.90 PPG (1.50 vs 0.60) • xG vs form (RWDM): Poisson projects 1.07 xG vs form scoring rate of 1.70 — model is more cautious than form; the opposition's defensive strength is tempering the scoring expectation • xG vs form (Patro Eisden): Poisson projects 1.54 xG vs form scoring rate of 1.10 — model rates visitors higher than form alone implies, noting a favourable attack-vs-defence matchup • Goals margin: form ~2.2 goals/game, Poisson xG sum 2.62 (49% Over 2.5) — no strong lean either way • BTTS: mixed signals — form blend ~50% BTTS rate, Poisson probability 52% — no strong positional edge • Form vs Poisson alignment: form and model agree on Patro Eisden — Patro Eisden at 48% Poisson win probability

What do the betting odds say about RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

• Odds data is not currently available for this fixture