🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Lommel United at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this Lokeren-Temse vs Lommel United fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Challenger Pro League encounter, Regular Season - 26 sees Lommel United travel to Daknamstadion to take on Lokeren-Temse. The game is scheduled for Saturday 21 February 2026, 19:00 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Lokeren-Temse stand at 4W 5D 1L from 10 Challenger Pro League matches — 1.70 PPG. Last five: D D L D W. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for Lokeren-Temse, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Lokeren-Temse have posted 2W 7D 1L at Daknamstadion — 1.30 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Across all Challenger Pro League games this season, Lommel United have recorded 7W 1D 2L from 10 outings — 2.20 PPG. Last five: W L D L W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.10. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Lommel United, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Lommel United's form when playing away from home: 5W 2D 3L across 10 road games this term (1.70 PPG). They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.70 is notably below their overall 2.20 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Form points away from home here. Lommel United's 2.20 PPG return is 0.50 points per game ahead of Lokeren-Temse's 1.70 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Lokeren-Temse register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant matches, Lommel United in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Lokeren-Temse, 1 for Lommel United and 1 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 3 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Aug 2025, ended 1–3 with Lommel United winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Data

Lokeren-Temse trading profile (53 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (home games).

Lommel United trading profile (53 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Lokeren-Temse 55% versus Lommel United 58%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Lokeren-Temse 45% | Lommel United 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Lokeren-Temse 1.31 xG and Lommel United 1.40 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Lokeren-Temse attack 0.933 / defence 0.998 | Lommel United attack 1.084 / defence 1.057. League average goals — home 1.327 / away 1.297. Data: 53 Lokeren-Temse games / 53 Lommel United games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Lokeren-Temse 35% | Draw 26% | Lommel United 39%. Fair-value odds: Lokeren-Temse 2.86 | Draw 3.85 | Lommel United 2.56. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.71. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.71 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Lommel United are the pick at 39% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Lommel United offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.71 combined xG gives a 51% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 55% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Lokeren-Temse 70% | Lommel United 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights