Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 24

Kick-off

Sun 8 Feb 2026

15:00

Venue

Stade Robert Urbain

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
📰

Stalemate at Francs Borains's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stade Robert Urbain, Regular Season - 24, as Francs Borains and RWDM drew 0-0 in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Francs Borains 1.19 xG and RWDM 1.14 xG, a combined 2.33. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Francs Borains fell 1.2 short of their projected output. RWDM landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Francs Borains attack 0.85 / defence 0.82 against RWDM attack 1.04 / defence 1.04, drawn from 50/51 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Francs Borains 37% | Draw 28% | RWDM 35%, with Francs Borains to win its most likely call at 37%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 28%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 41%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 68% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 47% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Francs Borains 54%, RWDM 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Francs Borains's trading profile (50 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

RWDM's trading profile (50 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.64 PPG against 1.08. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Francs Borains (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.08 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.38 average — tighter than their form line. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.54 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.25 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 41% Over 2.5 probability, 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 47% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data bucked — 53% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.