🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Beerschot VA edge out KRC Genk II 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Beerschot VA beat KRC Genk II 1-0 at Olympisch Stadion, Regular Season - 28, in the Challenger Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Beerschot VA 1.70 xG and KRC Genk II 1.28 xG, a combined 2.98. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. KRC Genk II landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Beerschot VA attack 0.91 / defence 0.91 against KRC Genk II attack 1.00 / defence 1.42, drawn from 26/54 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Beerschot VA 47% | Draw 24% | KRC Genk II 29%, with Beerschot VA to win its most likely call at 47%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 57%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 80% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 59% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Beerschot VA 52%, KRC Genk II 68%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Beerschot VA's trading profile (54 games, 27 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not.

KRC Genk II's trading profile (54 games, 27 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Beerschot VA arrived the stronger side — 1.31 PPG against 0.69. That form edge translated into the three points. Beerschot VA (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.11 average — tighter than their form line. KRC Genk II (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.04 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.19 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights