🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Ried at 38%, yet other data sources diverge — this Ried vs Wolfsberger AC fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Bundesliga encounter, Semi-finals sees Wolfsberger AC travel to Innviertel Arena to take on Ried. The game is scheduled for Tuesday 19 May 2026, 17:30 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Bundesliga games this season, Ried have gone 4W 2D 4L from 10 outings — a 1.40 PPG return. Last five: W L W L L. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Ried's home record at Innviertel Arena: 7W 1D 2L from 10 Bundesliga appearances (2.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 2.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.40 — Ried are significantly better at Innviertel Arena than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Wolfsberger AC stand at 4W 3D 3L from 10 Bundesliga matches — 1.50 PPG. Last five: L W W W W. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.

On the road, Wolfsberger AC have gone 2W 0D 8L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.60 is notably below their overall 1.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: Ried 1.40 PPG, Wolfsberger AC 1.50 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 9 previous encounters have yielded 3 wins for Ried, 4 for Wolfsberger AC and 2 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The last 9 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.7 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 9 May 2026, ended 0–1 with Wolfsberger AC winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.7 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Data

Ried trading profile (32 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (home games); they fail to score in 34% of games.

Wolfsberger AC trading profile (32 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 88% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Ried 50% versus Wolfsberger AC 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ried 44% | Wolfsberger AC 56%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ried 1.29 xG and Wolfsberger AC 1.20 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ried attack 0.806 / defence 1.095 | Wolfsberger AC attack 0.952 / defence 1.188. League average goals — home 1.346 / away 1.147. Data: 22 Ried games / 44 Wolfsberger AC games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ried 38% | Draw 28% | Wolfsberger AC 34%. Fair-value odds: Ried 2.63 | Draw 3.57 | Wolfsberger AC 2.94. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 45% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.48. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 55% — total xG of 2.48 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Ried at 38% — marginal model lean. With a 28% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Ried offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.48 combined xG gives a 45% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by H2H averaging 1.7 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 51% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: Ried 50% | Wolfsberger AC 50%.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights