Genk 3-1 RWDM – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Genk at 74% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Genk vs RWDM encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Pre-Match Analysis
Genk and RWDM meet at Cegeka Arena in Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 26. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 17 February 2024 at 15:00 UTC.
Form & Momentum
Genk have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 Jupiler Pro League outings this season: 3W 4D 3L. Last five: D D L L D. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Genk, so this record blends games from this season and last.
At home at Cegeka Arena, Genk have gone 4W 5D 1L this season (10 games, 1.70 PPG). They are averaging 2.40 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.
RWDM's overall Jupiler Pro League record this term: 1W 2D 7L from 10 games (0.50 PPG). Last five: L L L D L. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 2.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.60 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.
On the road, RWDM have gone 1W 2D 7L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.
The points-per-game gap of 0.80 in Genk's favour (1.30 vs 0.50) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.
In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Genk have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, RWDM in 70%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.
H2H History
Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: Genk 1W, RWDM 0W, 0D.
Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 4.0 goals per game across 1 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 29 Jul 2023, ended 4–0 with Genk winning.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.
Trading
Genk half-time and goal-timing data (57 games, 28 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%.
RWDM half-time and goal-timing data (57 games, 28 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 65% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.
From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Genk 63% and RWDM 63% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Genk 61% | RWDM 65%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Genk 2.67 xG and RWDM 0.93 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Genk attack 1.189 / defence 0.869 | RWDM attack 0.870 / defence 1.395. League average goals — home 1.609 / away 1.234. RWDM bring a strong defensive rating of 1.395 — this is suppressing Genk's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 59 Genk games / 25 RWDM games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Genk 74% | Draw 16% | RWDM 10%. Fair-value odds: Genk 1.35 | Draw 6.25 | RWDM 10.00. The model has a clear lean to Genk (74%) — a 64pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 70% | BTTS probability 57% | Total xG 3.60. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 70% — a total xG of 3.60 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS probability of 57% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Final Verdict
Poisson rates Genk as the most likely outcome at 74% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support.
The Poisson model projects 3.60 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 70% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game.
Poisson assigns a 57% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Genk 60% | RWDM 70% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Genk vs RWDM | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 26 | Venue: Cegeka Arena • Kick-off: Saturday 17 Feb 2024, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Genk 74% | Draw 16% | RWDM 10% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 70% | BTTS 57% | xG Genk 2.67 / RWDM 0.93 • Poisson strength factors: Genk attack 1.189 / def 0.869 | RWDM attack 0.870 / def 1.395 | league avg home 1.609 / away 1.234 • Poisson stance: Genk (74%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
2.67
Genk xG
Expected Goals
0.93
RWDM xG
57%
BTTS
88%
Over 1.5
70%
Over 2.5
49%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Genk vs RWDM kick off?
Genk vs RWDM kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 17 February 2024 at Cegeka Arena.
What was the final score in Genk vs RWDM?
Genk 3 - 1 RWDM.
Where is Genk vs RWDM being played?
The match is being played at Cegeka Arena.
What competition is Genk vs RWDM part of?
Genk vs RWDM is a Regular Season - 26 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win Genk vs RWDM?
Our statistical model gives Genk a 74% chance of winning, RWDM a 10% chance, and a 16% chance of a draw — making Genk the favourite.
Will both teams score in Genk vs RWDM?
Our model estimates a 57% probability that both Genk and RWDM will score (BTTS).
Will Genk vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 70%.
What is the head-to-head record between Genk and RWDM?
Record (1 meetings): Genk 1W | Draws 0 | RWDM 0W.
What form are Genk and RWDM in?
Genk (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.10 | L5 D-D-L-L-D. RWDM (all comps): 1W-2D-7L in 10 | 0.50 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 2.60 | L5 L-L-L-D-L.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Working from Genk's attack rating (1.19) and RWDM's defence rating (1.40), the model arrives at 2.67 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — RWDM's attack (0.87x) against Genk's defence (0.87x) — and the away total comes out at 0.93.
These ratings are built from 59/25 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 2-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 9.7%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.1%), 3-0 (8.6%). Together the top three scorelines make up 27% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
Genk Win
74%
1.35
16%
6.41
10%
9.55
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
2 – 0
9.7%
Home win
Most likely
2 – 1
9.1%
Home win
3 – 0
8.6%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
2.67
Genk xG
Total xG
3.60
0.93
RWDM xG
1.35
74%
Home win
6.41
16%
Draw
9.55
10%
Away win
Goals Markets
87%
Over 1.5
1.15
13%
Under 1.5
7.69
70%
Over 2.5
1.43
30%
Under 2.5
3.33
49%
Over 3.5
2.04
51%
Under 3.5
1.96
29%
Over 4.5
3.45
71%
Under 4.5
1.41
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
57%
BTTS Yes
1.76
43%
BTTS No
2.31
Clean Sheet
39%
2.54
7%
14.43
Win to Nil
29%
3.44
1%
137.78
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
| 1 | 7.3 | 6.8 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | – |
| 2 | 9.7 | 9.1 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 8.6 | 8.1 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | – |
| 5 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Genk vs RWDM?
Our Poisson model rates 2-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.7%.
How many goals are Genk and RWDM expected to score?
The model projects 2.67 expected goals for Genk and 0.93 for RWDM, a combined total of 3.60.
How confident is the prediction model for Genk vs RWDM?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 74%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Across their last 57 outings, Genk have picked up 1.77 PPG on a 28W 17D 12L record — D-D-L-L-D across the most recent five. The sample for Genk is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
RWDM's form line: 26W 13D 18L from 57 games, 1.60 PPG, last five L-L-L-D-L. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.77 PPG for Genk against 1.60 for RWDM. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.
Home & Away Splits
On home soil, Genk have posted 2.00 PPG from 28 outings (16W 8D 4L).
On the road, RWDM have gone 11W 5D 12L from 28 away games — 1.36 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Genk come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Genk are averaging 1.96 goals scored and 1.12 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.61 scored and 1.44 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: Genk have seen both teams score in 63% of their recent games; RWDM in 63%.
Last 57 Results — Jupiler Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Genk
Blended
RWDM
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Genk and RWDM in coming into this match?
Genk have gone 28W 17D 12L in their last 57 games (1.77 PPG), while RWDM have gone 26W 13D 18L in their last 57 (1.60 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Genk at home or RWDM away?
Genk's home record (2.00 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Genk at home: 2.00 PPG; RWDM away: 1.36 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 2 times since July 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Jupiler Pro League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 17 February 2024, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Last 2 Meetings
2
Genk
0
Draws
0
RWDM
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Genk and RWDM?
From 2 meetings on record, Genk have won 2, RWDM have won 0, and 0 have been drawn.
When did Genk and RWDM last play each other?
They last met on 17 February 2024, when Genk 3-1 RWDM.
Who has won more matches between Genk and RWDM?
Genk have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Genk are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 82% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time.
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 61% for Genk, 71% for RWDM — a strong two-way scoring signal.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 68% for Genk and 71% for RWDM. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 50% and 29% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Genk home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Genk play RWDM?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 61% of Genk's games and 71% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Genk vs RWDM usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 68% of Genk's matches and 71% of RWDM's.
Do Genk and RWDM tend to score early?
Genk have had a goal before half-time in 82% of their recent matches, RWDM in 64% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Genk cruise to a comfortable 3-1 victory over RWDM.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Genk beat RWDM 3-1 at Cegeka Arena, Regular Season - 26, in the Jupiler Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Genk 2.67 xG and RWDM 0.93 xG, a combined 3.60. The scoreboard read 3-1 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Genk attack 1.19 / defence 0.87 against RWDM attack 0.87 / defence 1.40, drawn from 59/25 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Genk 74% | Draw 16% | RWDM 10%, with Genk to win its most likely call at 74%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 70%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 88% and landed. Over 3.5 was 49% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 57% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 63% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Genk 61%, RWDM 65%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Genk's trading profile (57 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did.
RWDM's trading profile (57 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Genk 1.77 PPG, RWDM 1.60 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Genk win broke the near-deadlock. RWDM (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.61 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The numbers read this fixture well — the outcome largely followed the script the data laid out beforehand.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.