Sign in Register

Bodo/Glimt 3-0 Ham-Kam – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Eliteserien · Regular Season - 2

Kick-off

Sat 5 Apr 2025

15:00

Venue

Aspmyra Stadion

Competition

Eliteserien

Norway

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 55% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam meet at Aspmyra Stadion in Eliteserien (matchday 2). This fixture gets under way on Saturday 5 April 2025 at 16:00 UK time.

Form

Bodo/Glimt (all games): 5W 3D 2L across their last 10 — 1.80 PPG. Last five: L D D W W. They are averaging 2.30 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches.

At home, Bodo/Glimt have gone 7W 2D 1L in their last 10 home games (2.30 PPG). They are averaging 3.50 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Ham-Kam have collected 0.90 PPG across their last 10 games: 2W 3D 5L. Last five: W D L L L. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.

Ham-Kam away from home: 4W 2D 4L from their last 10 away games — 1.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game.

The form ledger tips toward Bodo/Glimt. A 0.90 PPG lead over Ham-Kam (1.80 vs 0.90) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 6 H2H matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt edge it 3 wins to 1, with 2 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage.

These two sides have produced goals at a healthy rate, averaging 3.5 per game across the 6 H2H matches we hold. That scoring profile supports the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent of those, on 13 Sep 2024, ended Bodo/Glimt 3–0 Ham-Kam — a Bodo/Glimt win.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 3.5 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Bodo/Glimt — key trading statistics (last 60 games, 30 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 83% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 58% of those occasions; of the 14 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 57%; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 53%.

Ham-Kam — key trading statistics (last 60 games, 30 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 77% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; of the 14 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 43%; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Bodo/Glimt 58% versus Ham-Kam 42%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Bodo/Glimt 65% | Ham-Kam 48%). Note also that Ham-Kam surrender HT leads in 43% of cases while Bodo/Glimt recover from half-time deficits to draw or win 57% of the time — a dynamic that could influence in-play positioning.

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Bodo/Glimt 1.96 xG and Ham-Kam 1.20 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Bodo/Glimt attack 1.257 / defence 1.026 | Ham-Kam attack 1.003 / defence 1.012. League average goals — home 1.539 / away 1.165. Bodo/Glimt carry an above-average attack rating of 1.257 — their 1.96 xG reflects attacking quality above the league norm. Data: built from Bodo/Glimt's last 31 games and Ham-Kam's last 31. Some of those games are older results, so treat these probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Bodo/Glimt 55% | Draw 22% | Ham-Kam 23%. Fair-value odds: Bodo/Glimt 1.82 | Draw 4.57 | Ham-Kam 4.33. The model has a clear lean to Bodo/Glimt (55%) — a 32pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS Yes probability 60% | Total xG 3.16. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.16 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% — both xG figures (1.96 / 1.20) are high enough that each side is projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Bodo/Glimt are the pick at 55% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.16 combined xG gives a 61% probability to Over 2.5 — strong conviction, supported by recent form (Bodo/Glimt's last 10 home games and Ham-Kam's last 10 away games) averaging 4.0 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 3.5 goals per game across 6 H2H matches.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 60%. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Bodo/Glimt 70% (last 10 home games) | Ham-Kam 50% (last 10 away games).

The Poisson model's sample (Bodo/Glimt 31 games, Ham-Kam 31) includes some older results, so its projections carry extra uncertainty — weight recent form and the odds accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (Bodo/Glimt 3W, 2D, Ham-Kam 1W from the 6 H2H matches in our data), with no clear advantage.
Goals H2H (3.50 goals/game across 6 H2H matches) and Poisson xG (3.16) both back Over 2.5 goals (61% Poisson probability).
Form Bodo/Glimt lead on PPG: 1.80 vs 0.90 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Bodo/Glimt Poisson xG (1.96) is below their recent form scoring rate (3.50 over their last 10 home games) — against this opponent, the model expects less than their recent scoring rate.
Form Ham-Kam Poisson xG (1.20) is below their form scoring rate (1.60 over their last 10 away games) — against this opponent, the model expects less than their recent scoring rate.
Goals Form averages (~3.3 goals/game from Bodo/Glimt's last 10 home games and Ham-Kam's last 10 away games) and Poisson xG (3.16) both support Over 2.5 goals at 61%.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Bodo/Glimt — Bodo/Glimt at 55% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Bodo/Glimt at 55% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 61% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS Yes probability is 60% — the model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam | Competition: Eliteserien, matchday 2 | Venue: Aspmyra Stadion • Kick-off: Saturday 5 April 2025 at 16:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Bodo/Glimt 55% | Draw 22% | Ham-Kam 23% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 61% (Under 39%) | BTTS Yes 60% (No 40%) | xG Bodo/Glimt 1.96 / Ham-Kam 1.20 • Poisson strength factors: Bodo/Glimt attack 1.257 / def 1.026 | Ham-Kam attack 1.003 / def 1.012 | league avg home 1.539 / away 1.165 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (55%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.96

Bodo/Glimt xG

Expected Goals

1.20

Ham-Kam xG

55%
22%
23%
Bodo/Glimt Draw Ham-Kam

60%

BTTS

82%

Over 1.5

61%

Over 2.5

39%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam FAQs

What time does Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam kick off?

Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam kicked off at 16:00 UK time on Saturday 5 April 2025 at Aspmyra Stadion.

What was the final score in Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?

Bodo/Glimt 3 - 0 Ham-Kam.

Where is Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam being played?

The match is being played at Aspmyra Stadion.

What competition is Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam part of?

Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam is a Eliteserien fixture (matchday 2) (Norway).

Who is favourite to win Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?

Our statistical model gives Bodo/Glimt a 55% chance of winning, Ham-Kam a 23% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.

Will both teams score in Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?

Our model estimates a 60% probability that both Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.

Will Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 61%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Bodo/Glimt's attacking strength (1.26x league average) is weighed against Ham-Kam's defensive record (1.01x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.96. Flip it around — Ham-Kam's attack (1.00x) against Bodo/Glimt's defence (1.03x) — and the away total comes out at 1.20.

These ratings are built from Bodo/Glimt's last 31 games and Ham-Kam's last 31, a sample that still includes some older results.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 11.3%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.8%), 2-0 (8.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Bodo/Glimt Win

55%

Bodo/Glimt

1.82

22%

Draw

4.57

23%

Ham-Kam

4.33

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.0%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.8%

Home win

1 – 0

8.3%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.96

Bodo/Glimt xG

Total xG

3.16

1.20

Ham-Kam xG

55%
22%
23%
Bodo/GlimtDrawHam-Kam

1.82

55%

Home win

4.57

22%

Draw

4.33

23%

Away win

Goals Markets

82%

Over 1.5

1.22

18%

Under 1.5

5.56

61%

Over 2.5

1.64

39%

Under 2.5

2.56

39%

Over 3.5

2.56

61%

Under 3.5

1.64

21%

Over 4.5

4.76

79%

Under 4.5

1.27

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

60%

BTTS Yes

1.67

40%

BTTS No

2.50

Clean Sheet

30%

Bodo/Glimt

3.31

14%

Ham-Kam

7.09

Win to Nil

17%

Bodo/Glimt

6.02

3%

Ham-Kam

30.70

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.3 5.1 3.1 1.2 0.4 0.1
1 8.3 10.0 6.0 2.4 0.7 0.2
2 8.2 9.8 5.9 2.3 0.7 0.2
3 5.3 6.4 3.8 1.5 0.5 0.1
4 2.6 3.1 1.9 0.7 0.2 0.1
5 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.958
λ Away (xG) 1.198
Total xG 3.156
League avg home goals 1.539
League avg away goals 1.165
Bodo/Glimt attack strength 1.257
Bodo/Glimt defence strength 1.026
Ham-Kam attack strength 1.003
Ham-Kam defence strength 1.012
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 31 / 31

❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam Prediction FAQs

What is the most likely scoreline for Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.3%.

How many goals are Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam expected to score?

The model projects 1.96 expected goals for Bodo/Glimt and 1.20 for Ham-Kam, a combined total of 3.16.

How confident is the prediction model for Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 55%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Bodo/Glimt come into this having played 60 games, going 40W 12D 8L for 2.20 points per game. Their last five reads L-D-D-W-W.

On the other side, Ham-Kam sit at 1.12 PPG from 60 outings (18W 13D 29L), a run that reads W-D-L-L-L across their last five.

Bodo/Glimt carry the stronger recent form of the two, 1.08 PPG clear of Ham-Kam — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Home & Away Splits

Bodo/Glimt's home form reads 22W 6D 2L across their last 30 home games, a 2.40 PPG return.

Away from home, Ham-Kam have taken 1.00 points per game from their last 30 away games (8W 6D 16L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Bodo/Glimt are averaging 2.48 goals scored and 1.15 conceded per game recently; Ham-Kam are on 1.22 scored and 1.63 conceded.

Defensively: Bodo/Glimt have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 60 Results

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

Current Season
L D D W W
Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

Current Season
W D L L L
60 Played 60
40/12/8 W / D / L 18/13/29
2.20 Points Per Game 1.12
2.48 Avg Goals Scored 1.22
1.15 Avg Goals Conceded 1.63
3.63 Avg Goals / Game 2.85
22 Clean Sheets 14
35 BTTS 25
39 Over 2.5 Games 29
Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

W
H Lillestrom
5–2 HT 2–1
01 Dec
W
A ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 1–0
23 Nov
D
H Fredrikstad
2–2 HT 0–1
10 Nov
D
A Molde
3–3 HT 1–2
03 Nov
L
H Rosenborg
2–3 HT 1–1
28 Oct
D
A Tromso
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H Kristiansund BK
4–0 HT 3–0
29 Sep
L
A Brann
1–4 HT 0–3
22 Sep
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
13 Sep
W
A Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Sep
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
6–0 HT 2–0
24 Aug
D
A Viking
1–1 HT 0–0
10 Aug
W
H Haugesund
4–2 HT 1–1
03 Aug
D
A KFUM Oslo
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H ODD Ballklubb
3–1 HT 1–1
19 Jul
L
A Sandefjord
1–2 HT 0–1
13 Jul
W
H Brann
5–1 HT 2–0
07 Jul
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–1 HT 0–1
28 Jun
W
A Haugesund
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Jun
D
H Sandefjord
1–1 HT 1–1
29 May
D
H KFUM Oslo
2–2 HT 1–1
24 May
L
A Ham-Kam
0–1 HT 0–1
20 May
W
H Tromso
4–0 HT 2–0
16 May
W
A Kristiansund BK
4–2 HT 1–1
12 May
W
H Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Rosenborg
3–1 HT 2–0
27 Apr
D
H Molde
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Apr
W
A Lillestrom
5–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
W
H Viking
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
W
A Fredrikstad
2–0 HT 0–0
01 Apr
W
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–0 HT 1–0
03 Dec
L
A Brann
2–4 HT 0–3
26 Nov
W
H Aalesund
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Nov
W
A Stabaek
4–0 HT 3–0
05 Nov
W
H Lillestrom
3–1 HT 1–0
30 Oct
W
H Sandefjord
4–3 HT 4–2
21 Oct
W
A Molde
3–1 HT 2–1
08 Oct
W
H Stromsgodset
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
W
H Valerenga
4–2 HT 2–1
24 Sep
D
A Rosenborg
1–1 HT 1–1
17 Sep
D
A Ham-Kam
4–4 HT 0–2
03 Sep
W
A Haugesund
3–1 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
A Viking
2–3 HT 2–2
06 Aug
L
H Tromso
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Jul
W
A Sandefjord
5–2 HT 3–2
23 Jul
W
H Haugesund
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
W
A ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Jul
D
H Molde
2–2 HT 0–2
02 Jul
L
A Stromsgodset
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Jun
W
H Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
11 Jun
W
A Valerenga
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Jun
W
H Viking
5–1 HT 2–0
29 May
W
A Tromso
3–2 HT 2–1
16 May
W
H Rosenborg
3–2 HT 2–1
13 May
W
A Lillestrom
2–1 HT 0–0
07 May
W
H ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 0–0
03 May
D
H Brann
2–2 HT 0–2
29 Apr
W
A Aalesund
3–0 HT 2–0
23 Apr
W
H Stabaek
4–0 HT 3–0
16 Apr
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Apr
Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

L
H KFUM Oslo
0–2 HT 0–1
01 Dec
L
A Fredrikstad
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Rosenborg
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Nov
D
A Tromso
3–3 HT 2–1
03 Nov
W
H Kristiansund BK
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Oct
L
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
0–2 HT 0–2
20 Oct
D
A Stromsgodset
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Sep
W
H Lillestrom
5–0 HT 4–0
21 Sep
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–0
13 Sep
D
H Sandefjord
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Sep
L
A Molde
0–3 HT 0–1
25 Aug
W
H ODD Ballklubb
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Aug
W
A Haugesund
1–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
D
H Viking
3–3 HT 0–1
04 Aug
L
H Fredrikstad
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
A ODD Ballklubb
2–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
D
H Tromso
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
A Sandefjord
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Jun
L
H Brann
1–2 HT 0–1
01 Jun
L
A Viking
0–3 HT 0–2
26 May
W
H Bodo/Glimt
1–0 HT 1–0
20 May
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
7–1 HT 5–0
16 May
D
H Haugesund
2–2 HT 1–0
12 May
D
A Kristiansund BK
1–1 HT 1–1
05 May
D
A Lillestrom
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Apr
L
H Stromsgodset
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
L
A Brann
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Apr
L
A Rosenborg
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
L
H Molde
0–1 HT 0–1
07 Apr
D
A KFUM Oslo
1–1 HT 1–0
02 Apr
D
A Molde
1–1 HT 1–0
03 Dec
L
H Valerenga
0–2 HT 0–0
26 Nov
W
A Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Viking
3–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
L
A ODD Ballklubb
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
H Haugesund
0–3 HT 0–1
22 Oct
W
A Sandefjord
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
A Stabaek
2–5 HT 1–2
04 Oct
D
H Sarpsborg 08 FF
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Sep
L
A Tromso
1–2 HT 0–2
17 Sep
D
H Bodo/Glimt
4–4 HT 2–0
03 Sep
W
H Rosenborg
3–0 HT 2–0
20 Aug
W
A Aalesund
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
L
H Brann
0–2 HT 0–2
06 Aug
L
A Lillestrom
1–3 HT 1–2
30 Jul
W
H Stabaek
3–2 HT 1–0
23 Jul
W
A Sarpsborg 08 FF
3–2 HT 3–2
16 Jul
W
H Aalesund
2–1 HT 0–0
07 Jul
L
A Brann
1–2 HT 0–1
02 Jul
L
H ODD Ballklubb
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Jun
L
A Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–0
11 Jun
L
A Rosenborg
0–4 HT 0–1
04 Jun
D
H Lillestrom
0–0 HT 0–0
29 May
L
A Valerenga
0–3 HT 0–3
16 May
L
H Tromso
1–2 HT 0–1
13 May
L
H Molde
0–4 HT 0–1
07 May
L
A Viking
3–7 HT 1–0
30 Apr
W
H Stromsgodset
2–0 HT 0–0
23 Apr
L
A Haugesund
2–3 HT 0–1
16 Apr
W
H Sandefjord
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Apr

Bodo/Glimt (Home) vs Ham-Kam (Away)

Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side

Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt

Current Season
W W L D W
Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam

Current Season
L L D D L
30 Played 30
22/6/2 W / D / L 8/6/16
2.40 Points Per Game 1.00
2.77 Avg Goals Scored 1.23
1.03 Avg Goals Conceded 1.97
3.80 Avg Goals / Game 3.20
12 Clean Sheets 4
17 BTTS 16
21 Over 2.5 Games 17
Bodo/Glimt

Bodo/Glimt — Home

W
Lillestrom
5–2 HT 2–1
01 Dec
D
Fredrikstad
2–2 HT 0–1
10 Nov
L
Rosenborg
2–3 HT 1–1
28 Oct
W
Kristiansund BK
4–0 HT 3–0
29 Sep
W
Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
13 Sep
W
Sarpsborg 08 FF
6–0 HT 2–0
24 Aug
W
Haugesund
4–2 HT 1–1
03 Aug
W
ODD Ballklubb
3–1 HT 1–1
19 Jul
W
Brann
5–1 HT 2–0
07 Jul
D
Sandefjord
1–1 HT 1–1
29 May
D
KFUM Oslo
2–2 HT 1–1
24 May
W
Tromso
4–0 HT 2–0
16 May
W
Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
D
Molde
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Apr
W
Viking
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
W
Sarpsborg 08 FF
2–0 HT 1–0
03 Dec
W
Aalesund
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Nov
W
Lillestrom
3–1 HT 1–0
30 Oct
W
Sandefjord
4–3 HT 4–2
21 Oct
W
Stromsgodset
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
W
Valerenga
4–2 HT 2–1
24 Sep
L
Tromso
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Jul
W
Haugesund
2–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
D
Molde
2–2 HT 0–2
02 Jul
W
Ham-Kam
3–0 HT 0–0
11 Jun
W
Viking
5–1 HT 2–0
29 May
W
Rosenborg
3–2 HT 2–1
13 May
W
ODD Ballklubb
2–0 HT 0–0
03 May
D
Brann
2–2 HT 0–2
29 Apr
W
Stabaek
4–0 HT 3–0
16 Apr
Ham-Kam

Ham-Kam — Away

L
Fredrikstad
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
Tromso
3–3 HT 2–1
03 Nov
D
Stromsgodset
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Sep
L
Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–0
13 Sep
L
Molde
0–3 HT 0–1
25 Aug
W
Haugesund
1–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
W
ODD Ballklubb
2–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
W
Sandefjord
2–1 HT 1–1
27 Jun
L
Viking
0–3 HT 0–2
26 May
W
Sarpsborg 08 FF
7–1 HT 5–0
16 May
D
Kristiansund BK
1–1 HT 1–1
05 May
D
Lillestrom
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Apr
L
Brann
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Apr
L
Rosenborg
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
D
KFUM Oslo
1–1 HT 1–0
02 Apr
D
Molde
1–1 HT 1–0
03 Dec
W
Stromsgodset
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
L
ODD Ballklubb
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Oct
W
Sandefjord
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
Stabaek
2–5 HT 1–2
04 Oct
L
Tromso
1–2 HT 0–2
17 Sep
W
Aalesund
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
L
Lillestrom
1–3 HT 1–2
30 Jul
W
Sarpsborg 08 FF
3–2 HT 3–2
16 Jul
L
Brann
1–2 HT 0–1
02 Jul
L
Bodo/Glimt
0–3 HT 0–0
11 Jun
L
Rosenborg
0–4 HT 0–1
04 Jun
L
Valerenga
0–3 HT 0–3
16 May
L
Viking
3–7 HT 1–0
30 Apr
L
Haugesund
2–3 HT 0–1
16 Apr

❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam Form FAQs

What form are Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam in coming into this match?

Bodo/Glimt have gone 40W 12D 8L in their last 60 games (2.20 PPG), while Ham-Kam have gone 18W 13D 29L in their last 60 (1.12 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Bodo/Glimt at home or Ham-Kam away?

Bodo/Glimt's home record (2.40 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Bodo/Glimt at home: 2.40 PPG; Ham-Kam away: 1.00 PPG.

Have Bodo/Glimt or Ham-Kam been keeping clean sheets recently?

Bodo/Glimt have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their recent games, Ham-Kam in 23%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

We have 10 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to July 2022 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in Eliteserien. The most recent was as recently as 17 October 2026, so it is a fresh reference point.

Records & Recent Trends

Bodo/Glimt have won each of the latest 5 H2H matches we hold, a run that gives them the edge coming in.

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bodo/Glimt won Bodo/Glimt 3-0 Ham-Kam on 11 Jun 2023, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Bodo/Glimt have gone 4W 1D 0L from the 5 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against Ham-Kam — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Bodo/Glimt

7

Bodo/Glimt

2

Draws

Ham-Kam

1

Ham-Kam

Recent Meetings

Ham-Kam
0–2
17 Oct 26
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
22 Jul 26
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
1–3
03 Aug 25
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
05 Apr 25
Ham-Kam
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
13 Sep 24
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
1–0
20 May 24
Bodo/Glimt
Ham-Kam
4–4
03 Sep 23
Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt
3–0
11 Jun 23
Ham-Kam
Bodo/Glimt
2–2
20 Aug 22
Ham-Kam
Ham-Kam
0–2
16 Jul 22
Bodo/Glimt

❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam H2H FAQs

What is the head-to-head record between Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam?

Across the 10 head-to-head matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt have won 7, Ham-Kam have won 1, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam last play each other?

The most recent meeting in our data was on 17 October 2026: Ham-Kam 0-2 Bodo/Glimt.

Who has won more matches between Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam?

Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 7 wins from the 10 head-to-head matches in our data.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 80% of those situations.

Ham-Kam are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 15% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Bodo/Glimt 57%, Ham-Kam 53% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 70% for Bodo/Glimt and 57% for Ham-Kam. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 60% and 27% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Bodo/Glimt keep a clean sheet in 40% of their matches; Ham-Kam in 33%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Bodo/Glimt home games / Ham-Kam away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Bodo/Glimt Bodo/Glimt Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 48/60
(80%)
25/30
(83.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 31/60
(51.7%)
17/30
(56.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/12
(91.7%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/12
(58.3%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 26/60
(43.3%)
15/30
(50%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/26
(3.8%)
1/15
(6.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/14
(57.1%)
4/5
(80%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/60
(58.3%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 39/60
(65%)
21/30
(70%)
Over 3.5 Goals 32/60
(53.3%)
18/30
(60%)
Clean Sheet 22/60
(36.7%)
12/30
(40%)
Failed to Score 4/60
(6.7%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Ham-Kam Ham-Kam Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/60
(70%)
23/30
(76.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/60
(30%)
11/30
(36.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 16/18
(88.9%)
7/7
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/18
(38.9%)
2/7
(28.6%)
Winning at HT 14/60
(23.3%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/14
(42.9%)
4/7
(57.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/25
(16%)
2/13
(15.4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 25/60
(41.7%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/60
(48.3%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/60
(23.3%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Clean Sheet 14/60
(23.3%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Failed to Score 23/60
(38.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)

❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam Trading FAQs

Do both teams usually score in Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam matches?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 57% of Bodo/Glimt's games and 53% of Ham-Kam's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Are Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam matches usually high-scoring?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 70% of Bodo/Glimt's matches and 57% of Ham-Kam's.

Do Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam matches tend to have early goals?

There has been at least one first-half goal in 83% of Bodo/Glimt's recent matches and 77% of Ham-Kam's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Bodo/Glimt run riot with a 3-0 hammering of Ham-Kam.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Bodo/Glimt beat Ham-Kam 3-0 at Aspmyra Stadion, Regular Season - 2, in the Eliteserien. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Bodo/Glimt 1.96 xG and Ham-Kam 1.20 xG, a combined 3.16. The scoreboard read 3-0 for 3 actual goals. Bodo/Glimt beat their projection by 1.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Ham-Kam landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Bodo/Glimt attack 1.26 / defence 1.03 against Ham-Kam attack 1.00 / defence 1.01, drawn from 31/31 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Bodo/Glimt 55% | Draw 22% | Ham-Kam 23%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 55%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 57% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Bodo/Glimt 65%, Ham-Kam 48%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

Ham-Kam's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 42% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 38% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.20 PPG against 1.12. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.03 average — tighter than their form line. Ham-Kam (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.23 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 1.97 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 61% Over 2.5 probability, 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 60% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 57% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.

More Eliteserien fixtures — matchday 2

All Eliteserien fixtures →