Sign in Register

Gillingham 1-0 AFC Wimbledon – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 44

Kick-off

Mon 21 Apr 2025

15:00

Venue

Priestfield Stadium

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 39% as Gillingham take on AFC Wimbledon.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon meet at Priestfield Stadium in League Two, Regular Season - 44. This fixture gets under way on Monday 21 April 2025 at 15:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Gillingham have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 League Two outings this season: 2W 7D 1L. Last five: D D D W D. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, Gillingham have posted 3W 3D 4L at Priestfield Stadium — 1.20 PPG. At home they are averaging 0.60 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Priestfield Stadium. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

AFC Wimbledon (all games): 3W 4D 3L across 10 League Two outings this term — 1.30 points per game. Last five: D L W D D. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

AFC Wimbledon's form when playing away from home: 1W 7D 2L across 10 road games this term (1.00 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.30 for Gillingham, 1.30 for AFC Wimbledon — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Head-to-Head

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 7 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Gillingham, 3 for AFC Wimbledon and 2 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Historically, goals have been at a premium in this fixture — just 1.6 per game from 7 meetings. The Under 2.5 has a clear base rate from the H2H record alone. The most recent clash, on 30 Dec 2024, ended 0–1 with AFC Wimbledon winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.6 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Data

Gillingham goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (89 games, 44 at home): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 79% of the time; BTTS occurs in 41% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 36% of games (home games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

AFC Wimbledon goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (89 games, 44 at away): they score before half-time in 48% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 72% of the time; BTTS occurs in 41% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 32% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 40% of the time; they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Gillingham 44% versus AFC Wimbledon 40%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Gillingham 34% | AFC Wimbledon 36%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Gillingham 0.72 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.78 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Gillingham attack 0.721 / defence 0.831 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.839 / defence 0.764. League average goals — home 1.302 / away 1.123. Gillingham's attack strength of 0.721 is below the league average — the 0.72 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. AFC Wimbledon's defence strength of 0.764 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 89 Gillingham games / 89 AFC Wimbledon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Gillingham 29% | Draw 39% | AFC Wimbledon 33%. Fair-value odds: Gillingham 3.45 | Draw 2.56 | AFC Wimbledon 3.03. The draw (39%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 19% | BTTS probability 29% | Total xG 1.50. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 81% probability — total xG of 1.50 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS No has firm model support at 71% — Gillingham's lower xG of 0.72 creates a meaningful probability of a scoring blank, which suppresses the BTTS Yes probability to 29%.

Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 39% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 29% and away win at 33% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 1.50 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 19% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 1.5 goals per game and H2H averaging 1.6 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 29% on No. Form rates corroborate: Gillingham 30% | AFC Wimbledon 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–2D–3W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (1.57 goals/game) and Poisson xG (1.50) both back Under 2.5 goals (81% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 29% and Poisson BTTS 29% — BTTS No has double-source support.
Goals Form averages (~1.1 goals/game) and Poisson xG (1.50) both support Under 2.5 goals (81% probability).
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 39% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 19% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is only 29% — model leans towards a clean sheet for one side.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon | Competition: League Two, Regular Season - 44 | Venue: Priestfield Stadium • Kick-off: Monday 21 Apr 2025, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Gillingham 29% | Draw 39% | AFC Wimbledon 33% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 19% | BTTS 29% | xG Gillingham 0.72 / AFC Wimbledon 0.78 • Poisson strength factors: Gillingham attack 0.721 / def 0.831 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.839 / def 0.764 | league avg home 1.302 / away 1.123 • Poisson stance: Draw (39%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

0.72

Gillingham xG

Expected Goals

0.78

AFC Wimbledon xG

29%
39%
33%
Gillingham Draw AFC Wimbledon

29%

BTTS

45%

Over 1.5

19%

Over 2.5

7%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon kick off?

Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon kicked off at 15:00 on Monday 21 April 2025 at Priestfield Stadium.

What was the final score in Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Gillingham 1 - 0 AFC Wimbledon.

Where is Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon being played?

The match is being played at Priestfield Stadium.

What competition is Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon part of?

Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon is a Regular Season - 44 fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our statistical model gives Gillingham a 29% chance of winning, AFC Wimbledon a 33% chance, and a 39% chance of a draw, making this a very evenly-matched fixture.

Will both teams score in Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our model estimates a 29% probability that both Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon will score (BTTS).

Will Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 19%.

What is the head-to-head record between Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon?

Record (7 meetings): Gillingham 2W | Draws 2 | AFC Wimbledon 3W.

What form are Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon in?

Gillingham (all comps): 2W-7D-1L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 1.00 | L5 D-D-D-W-D. AFC Wimbledon (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.00 | L5 D-L-W-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Gillingham's attacking strength (0.72x league average) is weighed against AFC Wimbledon's defensive record (0.76x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 0.72. Flip it around — AFC Wimbledon's attack (0.84x) against Gillingham's defence (0.83x) — and the away total comes out at 0.78.

These ratings are built from 89/89 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 0-0, at 24.0%. Close behind: 0-1 (15.8%), 1-0 (14.4%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 54% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Draw

29%

Gillingham

3.48

39%

Draw

2.58

33%

AFC Wimbledon

3.07

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 0

22.3%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

17.5%

Away win

1 – 0

16.0%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.72

Gillingham xG

Total xG

1.50

0.78

AFC Wimbledon xG

29%
39%
33%
GillinghamDrawAFC Wimbledon

3.48

29%

Home win

2.58

39%

Draw

3.07

33%

Away win

Goals Markets

44%

Over 1.5

2.27

56%

Under 1.5

1.79

19%

Over 2.5

5.26

81%

Under 2.5

1.23

7%

Over 3.5

14.29

93%

Under 3.5

1.08

2%

Over 4.5

50.00

98%

Under 4.5

1.02

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

29%

BTTS Yes

3.47

71%

BTTS No

1.40

Clean Sheet

46%

Gillingham

2.19

49%

AFC Wimbledon

2.05

Win to Nil

13%

Gillingham

7.61

16%

AFC Wimbledon

6.29

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 22.3 17.5 6.8 1.8 0.3 0.1
1 16.0 12.5 4.9 1.3 0.2
2 5.7 4.5 1.8 0.5 0.1
3 1.4 1.1 0.4 0.1
4 0.2 0.2 0.1
5

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.717
λ Away (xG) 0.782
Total xG 1.499
League avg home goals 1.302
League avg away goals 1.123
Gillingham attack strength 0.721
Gillingham defence strength 0.831
AFC Wimbledon attack strength 0.839
AFC Wimbledon defence strength 0.764
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 89 / 89

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 24.0%.

How many goals are Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon expected to score?

The model projects 0.72 expected goals for Gillingham and 0.78 for AFC Wimbledon, a combined total of 1.50.

How confident is the prediction model for Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 39%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Gillingham come into this having played 89 games, going 30W 25D 34L for 1.29 points per game. Their last five reads D-D-D-W-D.

On the other side, AFC Wimbledon sit at 1.52 PPG from 89 outings (36W 27D 26L), a run that reads D-L-W-D-D across their last five.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.29 PPG for Gillingham against 1.52 for AFC Wimbledon. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

Gillingham's home form reads 18W 13D 13L across 44 games on their own ground, a 1.52 PPG return.

Away from home, AFC Wimbledon have taken 1.18 points per game from 44 outings (12W 16D 16L).

Attack vs Defence

Gillingham are averaging 0.94 goals scored and 1.15 conceded per game recently; AFC Wimbledon are on 1.34 scored and 0.93 conceded.

Defensively: AFC Wimbledon in 40% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 89 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Gillingham

Gillingham

Current Season
D D D W D
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

Current Season
D L W D D
89 Played 89
30/25/34 W / D / L 36/27/26
1.29 Points Per Game 1.52
0.94 Avg Goals Scored 1.34
1.15 Avg Goals Conceded 0.93
2.09 Avg Goals / Game 2.27
30 Clean Sheets 36
39 BTTS 36
30 Over 2.5 Games 32
Gillingham

Gillingham

D
A Cheltenham
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Apr
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Apr
D
A Chesterfield
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Apr
D
A Salford City
2–2 HT 2–2
05 Apr
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Apr
D
A Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
H Walsall
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
D
A Accrington ST
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Mar
W
H Bradford
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Newport County
1–3 HT 0–3
04 Mar
W
H Morecambe
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
L
H Fleetwood Town
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Feb
D
A Carlisle
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
D
A Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
11 Feb
L
A Barrow
0–3 HT 0–0
08 Feb
L
H Notts County
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Feb
D
A Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Jan
D
A Tranmere
1–1 HT 1–1
25 Jan
L
H Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Jan
L
H Bromley
0–3 HT 0–2
02 Jan
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Dec
L
A Colchester
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
D
H Cheltenham
2–2 HT 1–1
20 Dec
W
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
14 Dec
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Dec
L
A Bromley
1–2 HT 0–0
04 Dec
L
H Harrogate Town
1–2 HT 0–0
23 Nov
W
H Port Vale
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Nov
D
A Swindon Town
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Oct
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–2
22 Oct
L
A Bradford
1–2 HT 1–2
19 Oct
L
H Accrington ST
1–2 HT 0–0
12 Oct
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
05 Oct
L
H Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Oct
W
H Barrow
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
A Notts County
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Sep
W
H Tranmere
3–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
L
A Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
07 Sep
W
H Chesterfield
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Aug
D
A Fleetwood Town
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
W
A Morecambe
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Aug
W
H Carlisle
4–1 HT 1–0
10 Aug
D
H Doncaster
2–2 HT 0–2
27 Apr
L
A Mansfield Town
1–2 HT 1–0
20 Apr
W
H Barrow
3–0 HT 1–0
13 Apr
L
A Bradford
0–1 HT 0–1
06 Apr
L
A Harrogate Town
1–5 HT 1–0
01 Apr
D
H Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Mar
W
A Morecambe
3–2 HT 1–1
23 Mar
D
H Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Mar
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
D
H Tranmere
1–1 HT 0–1
09 Mar
L
A Barrow
0–2 HT 0–1
05 Mar
W
A Salford City
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
W
H Wrexham
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Feb
D
H Stockport County
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Feb
L
A Newport County
0–1 HT 0–0
17 Feb
D
H Swindon Town
2–2 HT 0–1
13 Feb
W
A Notts County
3–1 HT 2–1
09 Feb
D
H Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
03 Feb
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Jan
D
H Forest Green
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jan
W
A Accrington ST
2–1 HT 0–0
13 Jan
W
A Colchester
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Jan
W
H Sutton Utd
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Dec
L
H Crawley Town
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
D
A Forest Green
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Dec
L
H Bradford
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Dec
W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Nov
L
A Tranmere
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Nov
W
H Salford City
3–1 HT 1–1
18 Nov
L
A Wrexham
0–2 HT 0–1
11 Nov
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–2
28 Oct
W
A Swindon Town
1–0 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
H Notts County
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Oct
L
A Walsall
1–4 HT 0–2
14 Oct
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Oct
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Oct
D
H Mansfield Town
1–1 HT 1–1
30 Sep
L
A Doncaster
1–2 HT 1–1
23 Sep
W
H Morecambe
2–1 HT 2–1
16 Sep
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
09 Sep
L
A Grimsby
0–2 HT 0–2
02 Sep
L
H Colchester
0–3 HT 0–0
26 Aug
W
A Crawley Town
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Aug
W
A Sutton Utd
1–0 HT 1–0
15 Aug
W
H Accrington ST
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Aug
W
A Stockport County
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

D
H Chesterfield
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
D
A Doncaster
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Apr
D
A Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
29 Mar
D
H Barrow
2–2 HT 0–0
22 Mar
W
A Carlisle
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Mar
L
H Cheltenham
1–2 HT 1–1
11 Mar
W
H Notts County
2–0 HT 2–0
08 Mar
L
A Morecambe
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Mar
L
H Bromley
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
A Colchester
1–1 HT 1–0
22 Feb
D
A Fleetwood Town
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Feb
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
W
H Crewe
3–0 HT 2–0
11 Feb
D
A Accrington ST
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Feb
W
H Bradford
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Feb
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
28 Jan
D
A Milton Keynes Dons
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Jan
W
H Tranmere
2–0 HT 0–0
18 Jan
W
A Newport County
2–1 HT 0–0
02 Jan
W
H Gillingham
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Dec
D
H Swindon Town
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
A Chesterfield
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Dec
W
H Doncaster
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Dec
W
A Harrogate Town
3–0 HT 2–0
07 Dec
D
H Newport County
2–2 HT 2–1
03 Dec
W
A Tranmere
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
L
H Walsall
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
H Accrington ST
2–2 HT 0–0
19 Nov
W
A Barrow
3–1 HT 1–1
16 Nov
L
H Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Nov
L
A Port Vale
2–3 HT 0–2
26 Oct
W
H Morecambe
3–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
L
A Notts County
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H Carlisle
4–0 HT 3–0
12 Oct
L
A Salford City
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Oct
D
A Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
3–0 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Fleetwood Town
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Aug
W
A Cheltenham
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
A Bromley
0–2 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
H Colchester
4–2 HT 3–2
10 Aug
W
H Walsall
5–1 HT 2–1
27 Apr
L
A Tranmere
2–3 HT 0–2
20 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
2–3 HT 1–0
13 Apr
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
L
A Stockport County
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Apr
D
H Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
23 Mar
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Mar
W
H Gillingham
2–0 HT 1–0
12 Mar
W
A Notts County
2–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
D
H Grimsby
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Mar
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Mar
L
A Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
24 Feb
L
H Crawley Town
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Feb
D
H Morecambe
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Feb
L
A Accrington ST
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Feb
W
H Barrow
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Feb
D
A Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Feb
W
H Mansfield Town
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Jan
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–3 HT 0–3
23 Jan
L
A Wrexham
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Jan
D
A Forest Green
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Jan
W
H Colchester
5–3 HT 2–2
29 Dec
L
H Sutton Utd
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Dec
W
A Crawley Town
2–1 HT 2–0
22 Dec
D
A Salford City
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Dec
W
H Swindon Town
4–0 HT 1–0
09 Dec
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Nov
W
H Notts County
4–2 HT 2–0
25 Nov
W
H Doncaster
2–0 HT 1–0
11 Nov
L
A Morecambe
1–4 HT 0–0
28 Oct
L
H Accrington ST
2–4 HT 0–2
24 Oct
D
A Barrow
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Oct
L
H Bradford
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Oct
D
A Mansfield Town
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Oct
W
A Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 1–0
03 Oct
W
H Tranmere
4–1 HT 2–1
30 Sep
W
A Walsall
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
D
H Crewe
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Sep
L
H Stockport County
1–2 HT 1–0
09 Sep
D
A Newport County
2–2 HT 2–1
02 Sep
D
H Forest Green
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Sutton Utd
3–0 HT 0–0
19 Aug
W
A Colchester
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Aug
D
H Wrexham
1–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
D
A Grimsby
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon in coming into this match?

Gillingham have gone 30W 25D 34L in their last 89 games (1.29 PPG), while AFC Wimbledon have gone 36W 27D 26L in their last 89 (1.52 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Gillingham at home or AFC Wimbledon away?

Gillingham's home record (1.52 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Gillingham at home: 1.52 PPG; AFC Wimbledon away: 1.18 PPG.

Have Gillingham or AFC Wimbledon been keeping clean sheets recently?

Gillingham have kept a clean sheet in 34% of their recent games, AFC Wimbledon in 40%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 8 times that we have on record, stretching back to August 2021 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 3 years. The pairing has crossed competitions too — League One, League Two all feature in the head-to-head log. It has been a while since the last meeting — 21 April 2025, some 3 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Notable Numbers

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Gillingham have gone 3W 1D 0L from 4 meetings on their own ground against AFC Wimbledon — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Gillingham

3

Gillingham

2

Draws

AFC Wimbledon

3

AFC Wimbledon

Recent Meetings

Gillingham
1–0
21 Apr 25
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
1–0
30 Dec 24
Gillingham
AFC Wimbledon
2–0
12 Mar 24
Gillingham
Gillingham
1–0
28 Nov 23
AFC Wimbledon
Gillingham
2–1
25 Feb 23
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
2–0
30 Jul 22
Gillingham
Gillingham
0–0
22 Feb 22
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
1–1
17 Aug 21
Gillingham

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon?

From 8 meetings on record, Gillingham have won 3, AFC Wimbledon have won 3, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Gillingham and AFC Wimbledon last play each other?

They last met on 21 April 2025, when Gillingham 1-0 AFC Wimbledon.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Gillingham see a goal before the break in 57% of their matches.

AFC Wimbledon see a goal before the break in 48% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Gillingham 41%, AFC Wimbledon 41% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Low-scoring games have been more typical here — Over 2.5 sits at just 36% for Gillingham and 32% for AFC Wimbledon.

On the defensive side: Gillingham keep a clean sheet in 41% of their matches; AFC Wimbledon in 36%; Gillingham have failed to score in 27% of games; AFC Wimbledon in 43%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Gillingham home games / AFC Wimbledon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Gillingham Gillingham Current Season
Metric All
(89 games)
Venue
(44 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 56/89
(62.9%)
25/44
(56.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/89
(23.6%)
11/44
(25%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 26/33
(78.8%)
15/19
(78.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 11/33
(33.3%)
6/19
(31.6%)
Winning at HT 18/89
(20.2%)
7/44
(15.9%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/89
(5.6%)
0/44
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/89
(6.7%)
4/44
(9.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 39/89
(43.8%)
18/44
(40.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 30/89
(33.7%)
16/44
(36.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 12/89
(13.5%)
5/44
(11.4%)
Clean Sheet 30/89
(33.7%)
18/44
(40.9%)
Failed to Score 27/89
(30.3%)
12/44
(27.3%)
AFC Wimbledon AFC Wimbledon Current Season
Metric All
(89 games)
Venue
(44 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 49/89
(55.1%)
21/44
(47.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/89
(25.8%)
10/44
(22.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 29/40
(72.5%)
14/23
(60.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 14/40
(35%)
9/23
(39.1%)
Winning at HT 30/89
(33.7%)
10/44
(22.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 8/89
(9%)
4/44
(9.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/89
(3.4%)
0/44
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 36/89
(40.4%)
18/44
(40.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/89
(36%)
14/44
(31.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/89
(22.5%)
8/44
(18.2%)
Clean Sheet 36/89
(40.4%)
16/44
(36.4%)
Failed to Score 28/89
(31.5%)
19/44
(43.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Gillingham play AFC Wimbledon?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 41% of Gillingham's recent matches and 41% of AFC Wimbledon's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Gillingham vs AFC Wimbledon usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 36% of Gillingham's recent games and 32% of AFC Wimbledon's, pointing to a tighter contest.

📰

Shock result as Gillingham defy the odds to beat AFC Wimbledon 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gillingham beat AFC Wimbledon 1-0 at Priestfield Stadium, Regular Season - 44, in the League Two. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gillingham 0.72 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.78 xG, a combined 1.50. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gillingham attack 0.72 / defence 0.83 against AFC Wimbledon attack 0.84 / defence 0.76, drawn from 89/89 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gillingham 29% | Draw 39% | AFC Wimbledon 33%, with the draw its most likely call at 39%. The actual Gillingham win had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 19%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 45% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 29% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 35% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gillingham 34%, AFC Wimbledon 36%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 42%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gillingham's trading profile (89 games, 44 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and duly kept one.

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (89 games, 44 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 40% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gillingham 1.29 PPG, AFC Wimbledon 1.52 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Gillingham win broke the near-deadlock. Gillingham (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 0.95 average — tighter than their form line. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.98 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 19% Over 2.5 probability, 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 29% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 35% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.