Wuhan Three Towns 0-1 Meizhou Kejia – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model favours Wuhan Three Towns (37%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Wuhan Three Towns face Meizhou Kejia.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Wuhan Sports Center Stadium plays host to Wuhan Three Towns versus Meizhou Kejia in Super League, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off: Saturday 25 May 2024 at 13:00 UTC.
Current Form
Wuhan Three Towns's overall Super League record this term: 7W 0D 3L from 10 games (2.10 PPG). Last five: L L W W W. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
Wuhan Three Towns's home record at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium: 7W 1D 2L from 10 Super League appearances (2.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground.
Meizhou Kejia (all games): 4W 3D 3L across 10 Super League outings this term — 1.50 points per game. Last five: D W D L L. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.
Meizhou Kejia away from home this season: 1W 2D 7L from 10 away games — 0.50 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.50 is notably below their overall 1.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.
The points-per-game gap of 0.60 in Wuhan Three Towns's favour (2.10 vs 1.50) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.
H2H History
The head-to-head record favours Wuhan Three Towns, who have won 4 of the last 4 meetings against Meizhou Kejia — a 0D 0W return for the visitors.
Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 4 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 23 Jul 2023, ended 2–1 with Wuhan Three Towns winning.
From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Wuhan Three Towns and goals. The home side's 4 wins from 4 meetings, combined with an average of 3.0 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.
Trading Data
Wuhan Three Towns goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (64 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; they lead at the break 51% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.
Meizhou Kejia goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (64 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (away games); they fail to score in 31% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 58% versus Meizhou Kejia 55%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 64% | Meizhou Kejia 56%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.20 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.09 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.821 / defence 0.884 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.833 / defence 0.948. League average goals — home 1.543 / away 1.486. Data: 43 Wuhan Three Towns games / 42 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 37% | Draw 32% | Meizhou Kejia 31%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 2.70 | Draw 3.12 | Meizhou Kejia 3.23. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 32% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 40% | BTTS probability 48% | Total xG 2.30. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 60% — total xG of 2.30 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 48% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Final Verdict
Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns as the most likely outcome at 37% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 32% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
On the goals line, Poisson's 2.30 combined xG gives a 40% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration — though form averaging only 3.0 goals per game and H2H averaging only 3.0 goals per meeting point in the other direction.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 48%. This conflicts with form data: Wuhan Three Towns 50% | Meizhou Kejia 70% from recent games — a notable divergence.
The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Center Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 25 May 2024, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 37% | Draw 32% | Meizhou Kejia 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 40% | BTTS 48% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 1.20 / Meizhou Kejia 1.09 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.821 / def 0.884 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.833 / def 0.948 | league avg home 1.543 / away 1.486 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (37%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.20
Wuhan Three Towns xG
Expected Goals
1.09
Meizhou Kejia xG
48%
BTTS
69%
Over 1.5
40%
Over 2.5
20%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia kick off?
Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia kicked off at 13:00 on Saturday 25 May 2024 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.
What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia?
Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 1 Meizhou Kejia.
Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia being played?
The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.
What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia part of?
Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Super League (China).
Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia?
Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 37% chance of winning, Meizhou Kejia a 31% chance, and a 32% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.
Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia?
Our model estimates a 48% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia will score (BTTS).
Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 40%.
What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia?
Record (4 meetings): Wuhan Three Towns 4W | Draws 0 | Meizhou Kejia 0W.
What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia in?
Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 7W-0D-3L in 10 | 2.10 PPG | GF 2.10 / GA 1.30 | L5 L-L-W-W-W. Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.50 | L5 D-W-D-L-L.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Working from Wuhan Three Towns's attack rating (0.82) and Meizhou Kejia's defence rating (0.95), the model arrives at 1.20 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Meizhou Kejia's attack (0.83x) against Wuhan Three Towns's defence (0.88x) — and the away total comes out at 1.09.
These ratings are built from 43/42 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 15.0%. Close behind: 0-0 (11.8%), 1-0 (10.4%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 37% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Wuhan Three Towns Win
37%
2.72
32%
3.13
31%
3.19
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 1
13.2%
Draw
Most likely
1 β 0
12.1%
Home win
0 β 1
11.0%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.20
Wuhan Three Towns xG
Total xG
2.30
1.09
Meizhou Kejia xG
2.72
37%
Home win
3.13
32%
Draw
3.19
31%
Away win
Goals Markets
67%
Over 1.5
1.49
33%
Under 1.5
3.03
40%
Over 2.5
2.50
60%
Under 2.5
1.67
20%
Over 3.5
5.00
80%
Under 3.5
1.25
8%
Over 4.5
12.50
92%
Under 4.5
1.09
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
48%
BTTS Yes
2.07
52%
BTTS No
1.93
Clean Sheet
33%
2.99
30%
3.33
Win to Nil
12%
8.13
9%
10.60
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 10.1 | 11.0 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 12.1 | 13.2 | 7.2 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 7.3 | 8.0 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | – |
| 4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.0%.
How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia expected to score?
The model projects 1.20 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 1.09 for Meizhou Kejia, a combined total of 2.30.
How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 37%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Wuhan Three Towns come into this having played 64 games, going 39W 12D 13L for 2.02 points per game. Their last five reads L-L-W-W-W.
On the other side, Meizhou Kejia sit at 1.30 PPG from 64 outings (23W 14D 27L), a run that reads D-W-D-L-L across their last five.
Wuhan Three Towns carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.72 PPG clear of Meizhou Kejia — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.
Home & Away Splits
Wuhan Three Towns's home form reads 19W 6D 7L across 32 games on their own ground, a 1.97 PPG return.
Away from home, Meizhou Kejia have taken 0.91 points per game from 32 outings (7W 8D 17L).
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 2.22 goals scored and 0.98 conceded per game recently; Meizhou Kejia are on 1.33 scored and 1.48 conceded.
Defensively: Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 64 Results — Super League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Wuhan Three Towns
Current Season
Meizhou Kejia
Current Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia in coming into this match?
Wuhan Three Towns have gone 39W 12D 13L in their last 64 games (2.02 PPG), while Meizhou Kejia have gone 23W 14D 27L in their last 64 (1.30 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Meizhou Kejia away?
Wuhan Three Towns's home record (1.97 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 1.97 PPG; Meizhou Kejia away: 0.91 PPG.
Have Wuhan Three Towns or Meizhou Kejia been keeping clean sheets recently?
Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their recent games, Meizhou Kejia in 22%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 8 times since August 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. They last met on 10 August 2025, roughly 12 months ago.
Records & Recent Trends
Meizhou Kejia go into this on the back of 4 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Wuhan Three Towns won 3-0 on 21 Nov 2022, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 2W 0D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Meizhou Kejia — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 8 Meetings
4
Wuhan Three Towns
0
Draws
4
Meizhou Kejia
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia?
From 8 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 4, Meizhou Kejia have won 4, and 0 have been drawn.
When did Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia last play each other?
They last met on 10 August 2025, when Wuhan Three Towns 1-2 Meizhou Kejia.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 74% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 48% of the time.
Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 53%, Meizhou Kejia 47% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 62% (Wuhan Three Towns) and 53% (Meizhou Kejia). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 44% and 25% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns keep a clean sheet in 38% of their matches; Meizhou Kejia in 41%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Meizhou Kejia away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Meizhou Kejia?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 53% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent matches and 47% of Meizhou Kejia's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 62% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 53% of Meizhou Kejia's.
Do Wuhan Three Towns and Meizhou Kejia tend to score early?
Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 74% of their recent matches, Meizhou Kejia in 71% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Shock result as Meizhou Kejia defy the odds to beat Wuhan Three Towns 0-1.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Meizhou Kejia beat Wuhan Three Towns 0-1 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Regular Season - 14, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 1.20 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.09 xG, a combined 2.30. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Wuhan Three Towns fell 1.2 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.82 / defence 0.88 against Meizhou Kejia attack 0.83 / defence 0.95, drawn from 43/42 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 37% | Draw 32% | Meizhou Kejia 31%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 37%. The actual Meizhou Kejia win had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 40%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 69% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 64%, Meizhou Kejia 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and conceded here.
Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 55% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
On form, Wuhan Three Towns arrived the stronger side — 2.02 PPG against 1.30. Form was overturned, with Meizhou Kejia winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.41 scoring average — below par going forward. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.75 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.